shine-300x300-4770213John Murphy, director of the New York City Employee Retirement System (NYCERS) from 1990 to 2005, says disclosure of pension recipients has been routine in the past and is essential to guard against misuse of taxpayer money in the future.  Reacting to yesterday’s post here on NYCERS’ stalling tactics in response to a Freedom of Information request from the Empire Center, Murphy sent us this email message — a sort of blank-verse backgrounder on the subject:

Every pension benefit must be adopted at an open meeting of the NYCERS board of trustees.

The resolution technically must identify the person receiving the pension and the amount of the pension.

In short, there is a public record of the pensioner and his/her benefit.

Circa 1994, NYCERS stopped printing the full list of names and amounts due to budget cuts, which were strangling us at that time.

But the detail must be made public on demand to insure against misappropriation of public funds.

Employees and retirees don’t like the public knowing their salaries and pensions, but it is absolutely necessary to prevent fraud.

In the past, “public record” meant a paper document that could be accessed at a public building.

Now, in the age of the Internet, “public” means really public, and all governments hate really public records.

Murphy, who blogs here, has sharply criticized his former agency over its failure to fully disclose documents that would explain a sharp increase in fees paid to private equity funds.

By the way, it’s now been more than 48 hours since the Empire Center’s director, Tim Hoefer, asked for minutes of the July 14 NYCERS board meeting at which, according to a spokesperson, “it was decided [by whom is still unclear] that a committee would be formed to establish a criteria based on safety concerns and unwarranted invasion of privacy for the release of names.”  Still no answer from NYCERS.

You may also like

Sorting Fact from Fiction on the Future of Medicaid

As Washington contemplates cutbacks to federal funding for Medicaid, officials in Albany have reacted in two self-contradictory ways. On one hand, they warn of Read More

The 411 On New York’s 911 Skim

New York for decades has collected, under various names, a special tax on mobile phones. The tax, which today shows up on customer bills as the “public safety communications surcharge,” devolved from being a fee to pay for 911 services to a general revenue source with 911 services as a near second thought. Since 2009, almost half the surcharges paid by customers for public safety communications—more than $1 billion—have been redirected to New York’s general fund. Read More

Immigrant Enrollment in ‘Emergency Medicaid’ Surges to 480,000

One of the biggest drivers of New York's Medicaid enrollment growth over the past decade has been "emergency Medicaid" for undocumented immigrants, newly released state records show. Read More

Medicaid’s Missing Million

The Health Department has been either unable or unwilling to document the eligibility status of almost one million Medicaid recipients, raising further concern about the possibility of large-scale over-enrollment. Read More

New York’s Medicaid Spiral Is Worse Than Hochul Admitted

Although Governor Hochul said last week that the current trajectory of Medicaid spending is "not sustainable," the upward trend is even steeper than she and her budget director have acknowledged. Read More

NY’s Road To Electric School Buses Gets Bumpy

New York in 2022 told school districts they’d be barred from purchasing gasoline- or diesel-powered buses after 2027, and instead have to buy electric buses at more than double the upfront cost. “The purchase of new electric buses will help grow the market,” officials later pledged, “which will in turn help reduce prices.” Unfortunately for taxpayers, those reductions aren’t materializing—because state officials put the prices, and future increases, on cruise control. Read More

Hochul Shows a Jarring Lack of Direction on Health Care

Financing and regulating health care delivery is one of the biggest responsibilities of state government, yet Governor Hochul had remarkably little to say on that topic in her State of the State speech on Tuesday. Read More

Hochul’s Pushing Affordability. It Would Cost A Lot.

Governor Hochul is hammering an “affordability” theme in the leadup to Tuesday's 2025 State of the State address. But her campaign, dubbed "Money In Your Pockets," has so far featured little that would reduce the cost of providing, and therefore buying, goods or services in New York. Instead, the biggest announced and expected elements reflect Albany's waning interest in growing the state economy—and a greater appetite to redistribute what it produces. Read More