A bill passed this morning in the U.S. House of Representatives would lift the cap on state and local income tax (SALT) deductions from $10,000 to $80,000. The provision would provide tax relief for many top earners and owners of expensive homes in high tax blue states. 

New Yorkers would certainly feel the impact of the measure as the New York City metro area alone contains twelve of the 16 U.S. counties with average single-family home property tax bills of $10,000 or more. 

According to a Roll Call analysis, five of the 14 congressional districts whose residents pay the highest average state and local income taxes are located in New York State, including the top two. Tom Suozzi, whose Nassau County district is number nine on the list, has been a leading advocate in the House for eliminating or raising the SALT cap.  

But the provision may not make it into law. 

The provision is part of a broader $1.7 trillion “Build Back Better” spending bill—funding everything from green energy tax credits to universal pre-K— that the President and Congressional Democrats are trying to enact over strenuous Republican objection. The bill failed to get a single Republican vote in the House today, and its only avenue to the President’s desk is a narrow legislative path through the Senate requiring unanimous Democratic support. 

Maintaining that unanimity may require the SALT provision be amended when the Senate takes up the bill next month. Senate Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders and New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez want to remove the SALT cap entirely for most filers, but leave it at $10,000 for high earners with incomes above $400,000 or a slightly higher threshold.   

The Sanders-Menendez proposal is likely to garner significant support. Why? 

First, there is the budget math. Raising the cap to $80,000 is projected by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to cost the Treasury about $50 billion per year in lost revenue. That revenue could be used to pay for even more social spending within the legislation, or to address its current $367 billion net cost. The House bill mitigates this problem by using a budgetary sleight of hand to make the cap hike nearly cost-neutral over a decade by eliminating the existing sunset date for the SALT cap. That means the $80,000 cap would stay in place for six years after the $10,000 cap is technically set to expire. 

More troubling for the Democrats than the budgetary math is the political math. From the President on down, Democrats have broadly defended the “Build Back Better” bill as legislation that finances important social spending and energy priorities by taxing only those that earn over $400,000.  

In other words, they say the bills “soak the rich” qualities are a feature, not a bug.  

And it certainly targets high earners as a revenue source. For instance, the bill would levy a five percent surcharge on high-earning individuals, estates and trusts with income over $10 million, and an additional three percent surcharge on those with income over $25 million. 

But the SALT cap hike muddies the message.  

Tax Policy Center analysis finds that households earning under $175,000 would get only six percent of the benefit of lifting the cap to $80,000, while one-third of the benefit would go to the top-earning one-percent of households (those earning $870,000 or more.) That makes the House provision politically awkward.  

And it makes the Sanders-Menendez proposal a politically viable alternative whose benefit is directed toward middle and upper-middle income households that aren’t earning quite enough to put them on the Democrats broader hit list.   

About the Author

Peter Warren

Peter Warren is the Director of Research at the Empire Center for Public Policy.

Read more by Peter Warren

You may also like

Albany’s soak-the-rich push ignores the large grain of SALT

Tax proposals embraced by Democrats represent a sizable increase in a top rate that already stands at an all-time record high. Read More

SCOTUS Punts To Biden On Potential Challenge to NY’s Taxing of Work-at-Home Nonresidents

The U.S. Supreme Court today kept alive federal litigation that could cost New York a big chunk of the billions of dollars in taxes it collects from nonresidents working for New York-based employers. Read More

The Pandemic Could Take Away Some NY Cash Cows

The Empire State has long asserted the right to tax nonresidents commuting to work in New York—even when their work is done at home. The payoff for Albany is huge: as of 2018, newly released state data show, nonresidents generated $7.4 billion in New York State personal income taxes, 15 percent of the total. Most of that came from people who were regular commuters before COVID-19 hit. Read More

In Pandemic Recovery, New York’s Tax Base Is More Fragile Than Ever

New York's exceptionally wealthy state tax base is also exceptionally fragile, due to its heavy dependence on the highly volatile (and portable) investment-driven incomes of Wall Street workers and fund managers. Read More

New Yorkers Paid Less in Federal Taxes in First Year of New Federal Tax Law

Federal income taxes paid by New Yorkers decreased by nearly $3.4 billion in 2018, the first year of the new federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), according to newly released Internal Revenue Service data. Read More

SALT suit swept aside

In what could rank among the least surprising federal court rulings of this or any year, a U.S. District Court judge in Manhattan has rejected New York's constitutional challenge to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap in the new federal tax law. Read More

Gillibrand’s shifting Medicare math

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has apparently doubled the price tag of her Medicare buy-in proposal, from 4 percent of income to 8 percent – but the math still does not add up. Read More

Soaking the rich—or not

New York State's so-called millionaire tax, temporarily raising the state's top income tax rate to 8.82 percent from the permanent law limit of 6.85 percent, is next scheduled to expire at the end of 2019. The added tax generates roughly $4.5 billion a year, about 9 percent of net personal income tax revenues, making New York more dependent than ever on the highest-earning one percent of its taxpayers. The future of the tax has now emerged as an issue in the gubernatorial campaign. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!