In a major victory for taxpayers, New York State’s highest court has ruled unanimously that Buffalo teachers are not entitled to catch-up longevity pay step increases for the 38 months when their wages were frozen by the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority.

The ruling will save the city $100 million, the Buffalo News reported. It also has immediate implications for Nassau County, where another state control board has just ordered a similar wage freeze. The Buffalo Teachers Federation reportedly will attempt to appeal the case in federal court on “contact impairment” grounds — but that route hasn’t worked out too well for the union in the past.

As argued in a legal analysis released by the Empire Center last year, under a line of court decisions relating to the power of state financial control boards for troubled municipalities, the state Legislature has the authority to statutorily freeze wages in mid-contract for all state and local employees, pursuant to a finding that a freeze is necessary under current fiscal conditions. State Sen. John Flanagan last year introduced a bill that would have imposed a one-year freeze on teacher salaries statewide, a move that would have saved taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars– while also savings thousands of teaching jobs endangered by state aid cuts. The state Conference of Mayors has also called on the Governor and Legislature to temporarily freeze wages for local government workers.

Gov. Cuomo, however, has not exploited this opportunity. In fact, even while claiming he wants to freeze that pay of state workers for at least one year, Cuomo has budgeted $140 million for their step increases.

Memo to Legislative Correspondents Association: will someone please ask the Governor what he thinks of the Buffalo decision?

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.

The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More