Thanks to an absurdly wasteful federal law, New York’s Essential Plan is expected to continue running billion-dollar surpluses even as state officials more than double its spending over the next several years.

According to estimates in an expansion plan from the Health Department, the cost of the state-operated health plan for the near-poor – which was just under $6 billion in 2022 – will break $11 billion in 2024 and $12 billion by 2027, an increase of 112 percent in five years.

The expanded plan would not only cover more people, but also reduce their cost-sharing, increase payments to medical providers and health plans and add coverage for long-term care.

Yet the program won’t come close to using all the federal money it’s due to receive, meaning surpluses of $1 billion to $2 billion a year will continue piling up in a trust fund.

 

The peculiar finances of the Essential Plan derive from an optional provision of the Affordable Care Act that was exercised only by New York and Minnesota. Under this provision, states that establish a Medicaid-like “basic health program” for lower-income residents are entitled to collect 95 percent of the ACA premium tax credits that enrollees would otherwise receive.

In New York’s case, this funding formula has unexpectedly generated far more revenue than the state needed – likely because the tax credits are based on New York’s high commercial premiums, whereas the Essential Plan has paid relatively low, Medicaid-like fees for care.

As a result, the program’s trust fund has built up an accumulated surplus of more than $10 billion – money that’s stranded in legal limbo.

Launched in 2015, the Essential Plan currently offers low- or no-cost coverage to New Yorkers with incomes up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level, or $29,160 for an individual. As of January, more than 1.2 million people were enrolled.

The Hochul administration is seeking a federal waiver that would expand eligibility to 250 percent of the poverty level, or $36,450 for an individual, beginning in April 2024. This is expected to increase enrollment by about 100,000 – but mostly from people who already have alternate insurance. The net increase in coverage is estimated to be about 35,000.

 

The plan would also pay higher fees for hospitals, doctors and clinics, subsidize certain health plan expenses and add coverage for in-home long-term care. Annual spending per member would increase from about $5,600 last year to $7,800 in 2024, or 38 percent.

But the program's already over-generous revenue stream would balloon as well – thanks largely to the unusually high cost of health insurance in New York.

Under the ACA, New York is entitled to collect 95 percent of the value of tax credits that Essential Plan enrollees would have received if they bought commercial coverage through the state's insurance exchange, known as the New York State of Health. The amount of those tax credits, in turn, is based on the cost of the second-lowest silver-level plan on the exchange. In New York, those benchmark premiums have risen faster than in most other states, and currently sit at 54 percent above the U.S. average.

Under the ACA's dysfunctional formula, those higher premiums automatically generate more money for the Essential Plan – effectively rewarding New York for allowing health insurance costs to spiral.

The formula pays no attention to what the Essential Plan coverage actually costs, allowing the program to run massive annual surpluses – which the state's proposed expansion will reduce but not eliminate.

As of earlier this year, the program's trust fund reached $10 billion – a balance that is likely to sit unused for the foreseeable future. By federal law, the state cannot divert the money for any other purpose, nor can the federal government readily claw it back.

The program distorts New York's insurance market to some extent – by diverting a segment of generally younger, healthier customers from the commercial risk pool, likely contributing to higher premiums for those left behind.

Yet state officials have not been motivated to raise complaints about a program that provides health coverage for more than 1 million New York residents at Washington's expense.

From the national point of view, however, the program is massively wasteful. According to state estimates for 2025, federal taxpayers (including New Yorkers) will be spending about $9,300 per enrollee for coverage worth only $8,200 – with no one realizing any benefit from that extra $1,100.

The only available solution is for federal lawmakers to rewrite this broken provision of the ACA – which will be difficult to negotiate in a politically divided Congress.

This raises the question of how big the Essential Plan trust fund will have to grow before Washington takes action – $20 billion, $50 billion, $100 billion? As the law stands now, it's only a matter of time.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

Hochul’s ‘Straight Talk’ on Medicaid Isn’t Straight Enough

Arguably the biggest Medicaid news in Governor Hochul's budget presentation was about the current fiscal year, not the next one: The state-run health plan is running substantially over budget. Read More

Despite Lingering Shortages, New York’s Health-Care Workforce Is Bigger Than Ever

The state's health-care workforce is recovering unevenly from the pandemic, with persistently lower employment levels in some areas and robust growth in others. This mixed pattern c Read More

In a Tight Budget Year, New York’s Hospital Lobby Shoots for the Moon

As Governor Hochul calls for spending restraint next year, influential hospital lobbyists are pushing what could be the costliest budget request ever floated in Albany. In a , the G Read More

Putting the Mission in Hochul’s Health Commission

Last week Governor Hochul answered one big question about her Commission on the Future of Health Care – the names of its members – but left a fundamental mystery unresolved:  W Read More

Medicaid Drug ‘Carve-Out’ Led to Double Payments

The state's Medicaid program has effectively been double-paying for prescription drugs for the past six months due to a glitch with the roll-out of its pharmacy "carve-out." Since A Read More

DFS Pulls Back Draft Regulations That Would Have Added a Fee for Prescriptions

A package of proposed regulations that included a $10.18 fee for filling most drug prescriptions was withdrawn Tuesday by the Department of Financial Services in the face of broad opposition. Read More

DeRosa Is Still Hiding the Truth About Cuomo’s Pandemic Response

As the long-time top aide to former Governor Andrew Cuomo, Melissa DeRosa ought to have useful information to share about the state's pandemic response – especially about what went wrong and how the state could be better Read More

Hochul’s Promised Health Care Commission Has Yet To Be Appointed

A health-care commission that is supposed to be helping the state control soaring Medicaid costs – which Governor Hochul promised in January and described as "under way" last month – appears not to exist. Thre Read More