Thanks to an absurdly wasteful federal law, New York’s Essential Plan is expected to continue running billion-dollar surpluses even as state officials more than double its spending over the next several years.

According to estimates in an expansion plan from the Health Department, the cost of the state-operated health plan for the near-poor – which was just under $6 billion in 2022 – will break $11 billion in 2024 and $12 billion by 2027, an increase of 112 percent in five years.

The expanded plan would not only cover more people, but also reduce their cost-sharing, increase payments to medical providers and health plans and add coverage for long-term care.

Yet the program won’t come close to using all the federal money it’s due to receive, meaning surpluses of $1 billion to $2 billion a year will continue piling up in a trust fund.

 

The peculiar finances of the Essential Plan derive from an optional provision of the Affordable Care Act that was exercised only by New York and Minnesota. Under this provision, states that establish a Medicaid-like “basic health program” for lower-income residents are entitled to collect 95 percent of the ACA premium tax credits that enrollees would otherwise receive.

In New York’s case, this funding formula has unexpectedly generated far more revenue than the state needed – likely because the tax credits are based on New York’s high commercial premiums, whereas the Essential Plan has paid relatively low, Medicaid-like fees for care.

As a result, the program’s trust fund has built up an accumulated surplus of more than $10 billion – money that’s stranded in legal limbo.

Launched in 2015, the Essential Plan currently offers low- or no-cost coverage to New Yorkers with incomes up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level, or $29,160 for an individual. As of January, more than 1.2 million people were enrolled.

The Hochul administration is seeking a federal waiver that would expand eligibility to 250 percent of the poverty level, or $36,450 for an individual, beginning in April 2024. This is expected to increase enrollment by about 100,000 – but mostly from people who already have alternate insurance. The net increase in coverage is estimated to be about 35,000.

 

The plan would also pay higher fees for hospitals, doctors and clinics, subsidize certain health plan expenses and add coverage for in-home long-term care. Annual spending per member would increase from about $5,600 last year to $7,800 in 2024, or 38 percent.

But the program's already over-generous revenue stream would balloon as well – thanks largely to the unusually high cost of health insurance in New York.

Under the ACA, New York is entitled to collect 95 percent of the value of tax credits that Essential Plan enrollees would have received if they bought commercial coverage through the state's insurance exchange, known as the New York State of Health. The amount of those tax credits, in turn, is based on the cost of the second-lowest silver-level plan on the exchange. In New York, those benchmark premiums have risen faster than in most other states, and currently sit at 54 percent above the U.S. average.

Under the ACA's dysfunctional formula, those higher premiums automatically generate more money for the Essential Plan – effectively rewarding New York for allowing health insurance costs to spiral.

The formula pays no attention to what the Essential Plan coverage actually costs, allowing the program to run massive annual surpluses – which the state's proposed expansion will reduce but not eliminate.

As of earlier this year, the program's trust fund reached $10 billion – a balance that is likely to sit unused for the foreseeable future. By federal law, the state cannot divert the money for any other purpose, nor can the federal government readily claw it back.

The program distorts New York's insurance market to some extent – by diverting a segment of generally younger, healthier customers from the commercial risk pool, likely contributing to higher premiums for those left behind.

Yet state officials have not been motivated to raise complaints about a program that provides health coverage for more than 1 million New York residents at Washington's expense.

From the national point of view, however, the program is massively wasteful. According to state estimates for 2025, federal taxpayers (including New Yorkers) will be spending about $9,300 per enrollee for coverage worth only $8,200 – with no one realizing any benefit from that extra $1,100.

The only available solution is for federal lawmakers to rewrite this broken provision of the ACA – which will be difficult to negotiate in a politically divided Congress.

This raises the question of how big the Essential Plan trust fund will have to grow before Washington takes action – $20 billion, $50 billion, $100 billion? As the law stands now, it's only a matter of time.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

State Delays Disclosing Emails About $1B Home Health Contract

For a third time the state Health Department has postponed releasing records related to a disputed $1 billion Medicaid contract, saying it needs another six weeks or more to locate and redact the materials in question. Read More

Email Confirms Early Contact Between NY Officials and CDPAP Contractor

State officials met with the ultimate winner of a $1 billion Medicaid contract two weeks before the Legislature authorized bidding on the job as part of the state's 2024-25 budget, an email obtained by the Empire Center sho Read More

Budget Update Paints Less Alarming Picture of Federal Health Cuts

A new fiscal report from the state Budget Division suggests federal funding cuts will hit New York's health-care budget less severely than officials have previously warned. A relea Read More

Parsing the Impact of Mamdani’s Tax Hike Plans

The front-running candidate for New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has said he can finance his costly campaign promises – including free buses and universal child care – by taxing only a sliver of the city's residents Read More

DOH Ducks a Simple Question on Covid in Nursing Homes

Five years after the coronavirus pandemic, the state Department of Health is pleading ignorance about one of its most hotly debated policy choices of the crisis – a directive that sent thousands of infected patients into Read More

In the Fight Over ACA Tax Credits, the Stakes Are Lowest for New York

As Washington skirmishes over the future of enhanced tax credits under the Affordable Care Act, New York has relatively little to gain or lose. The number of New Yorkers using any A Read More

New York’s Immigrant Health Coverage Becomes a National Flash Point

A little-noticed New York program that provides Medicaid coverage to elderly undocumented immigrants was thrust onto the national stage this week as the White House sparred with congressional Democrats over the federal gove Read More

Why New York’s Health Premiums Keep Going Up

New Yorkers continue to face some of the costliest health premiums in the U.S., and the insurance industry's recently finalized rate applications shed light on why that is. In summa Read More