The Times ran a construction-progress update today on Mayor Bloomberg’s plan to develop the Far West Side of Manhattan.
The story doesn’t mention how drastically City Hall has had to change its financial estimates — and make actual taxpayer-cash outlays — for the project.Back in 2006, the city helped the special-purpose Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation issue $2 billion in bonds to fund a #7 train extension and some other improvements out at the site. The city didn’t guarantee the bonds, but promised to make interest payments on them if revenues fell short.
Not to worry, though: revenues wouldn’t fall short, at least not for long. In its original bond document, the city projected that it would have to shell out just $7.4 million in taxpayer money to cover this promise in 2008 … and that would be it (p34).
Fast forward to the real future. Last year, the city made $43 million in such “interest support payments” (p17). And over the next seven years, it expects to shell out another $294.9 million (p40).
Hudson Yards “does not expect to generate sufficient Revenues from development in the project area to pay all the interest due on its Bonds for the foreseeable future,” the latest bond document notes.
You may also like
The House GOP’s Shrinking Budget Plan Could Still Cost New York Billions
The likely impact of federal health-care cutbacks has diminished in recent days as House Republican leaders backed away from some of their bigger-ticket proposals, reducing the estimated savings to $625 billion from previous figures of $715 billion and $8 Read More
Feds Move To Close Medicaid’s ‘MCO Tax’ Loophole, Spelling Trouble for New York
New York's budget has sprung its first major leak just five days after being finalized by Governor Hochul and the Legislature.
On Tuesday, federal officials announced a that would Read More
Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget
The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan:
Top lines
Read More
Unforeseen Consequences
We acknowledge that the impact of these measures will be determined by their scope, implementation timeline, pace, and advancements in technology, infrastructure, and market dynamics.
Read More
Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy
New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More
How Medicaid ‘Expansion’ Changes Could Affect New York
As House Republicans consider cutbacks to federal Medicaid funding, their focus has turned to the so-called expansion population.
Although the details of remain undetermined, the s Read More
How Albany Could Save Millions by Closing a Medicaid Loophole
A glitch in state insurance law is allowing doctors to collect Medicaid fees that are sometimes hundreds of times higher than the program normally pays, costing taxpayers millions of dollars a year.
Read More
After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality
This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck.
When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More