Long Island town officials are crying the blues over the budgetary squeeze supposedly created by the state’s property-tax cap. They’re not alone: You’ll hear much the same from town pols elsewhere in the metro region and across New York state.

But the thrust of their complaints — that the tax cap is somehow blocking urgent public projects and programs — just won’t hold water.

Due to low inflation, the basic tax cap for local fiscal years beginning Jan. 1, 2016, will be 0.73 percent — the lowest since the cap was signed into law in 2011. Locally variable exclusions and exemptions typically will raise the town cap to an average of a little more than 1 percent.

With tentative 2016 town budgets due to be unveiled this week, Newsday’s front-page on Tuesday blared: “Long Island Officials: Tax Cap’s Too Tight.”

“To stay under the cap, officials in a number of towns say they will not hire for some open positions and will be forced to delay key projects,” the newspaper reported.

“Forced”? Please.

The cap can be overridden by a vote of at least 60 percent of a municipality’s governing body. The vast majority of towns across New York are governed by five-member boards: All it takes to override the cap is the same three votes needed to pass a budget and tax hike under the cap.

Someone should explain that to Huntington Supervisor Frank Petrone, quoted by Newsday as blaming the tax cap for delaying a new parking garage and new town parks. Petrone and three fellow Democrats occupy four of five town-board seats. It shouldn’t be too tough for him to muster three votes for an override — assuming the parking garage and parks are really needed, that is.

The same situation exists in the town of Babylon, where Supervisor Richard Schaffer reportedly cited the need to replace an “outdated” animal shelter and “rundown” trailers used by landfill employees. Schaffer and his fellow Democrats cast four of the five town-board votes.

For towns with seven-member boards, an override requires five votes, one more than a simple majority. But in most such places, including Nassau County mega-towns of Hempstead and North Hempstead, Democrats or Republicans control both the supervisor’s chair and a super-majority.

In reality, for municipalities across New York state, the tax cap is less a real fiscal obstacle than a potential political cudgel. Town-board members serving two-year terms are fearful that overriding the cap — for any reason — will create an issue for challengers.

Too bad. Elected officials who want to be seen as leaders ought to act like it. If they believe the cap is blocking important local priorities, they should muster the guts to propose an override and explain to the public why it’s needed.

True, the tax cap’s impact has been complicated by Gov. Cuomo’s temporary tax “freeze” gimmick, which gives homeowners a state income-tax credit to reimburse any tax hikes paid under the cap. But this is hardly a big deal: For a $350,000 house in Huntington, the freeze credit for 2016 will come to roughly $15. In any event, the credit expires next year.

Long Island and the lower Hudson Valley are saddled with some of the highest local property taxes in the country relative to homeowners’ incomes — and while town taxes are a relatively small share of the total, all levels of government need to control their appetites as a way of lowering those burdens in the long run.

Instead of complaining about the tax cap, local pols should press Albany harder for relief from state mandates that make it difficult to restructure costly compensation packages for public employees. They also should do more to resist and spotlight state laws that drive up local infrastructure costs, including union prevailing-wage requirements.

The root of all this tax-cap bellyaching by Long Island politicians may have been inadvertently summed up in a comment attributed by Newsday to Deputy Supervisor Aline Khatchadourian of the town of North Hempstead.

This year, she said, “There’s no wish list.”

In other words, the tax cap is working.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is a senior fellow at the Empire Center.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

New York is looking at an ocean of red ink

New York’s new budget — the actual state-government expenditure plan, that is, as opposed to numerous side issues packaged with it — apparently came in close to Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s bottom line. Read More

The cap that worked

When New York’s 2 percent cap on local property tax levies was about to become law in June 2011, the statewide teachers union warned of an apocalypse just around the corner. Eight years later, New York’s school districts are better funded than ever—still atop national expenditure rankings, now laying out nearly 90 percent more per pupil than the 50-state average. But the rise in school property taxes statewide has slowed by more than two-thirds, to an average of 1.8 percent a year, saving homeowners and businesses billions of dollars in 2018 alone.   Read More

Suburban Dems’ first move should be to extend the property tax cap

Urban progressives took over the New York state Senate in November, but the body’s biggest swing group will be suburban Democrats. These Democrats will need to prove themselves to their voters, many of them homeowners in places like Long Island and West­­chester. The most valuable deliverable for the nascent suburban caucus will be a permanent extension of Gov. Cuomo’s property-tax cap. Read More

Fending Off Cuomo’s $15 Fetish

New York has seldom seen an executive initiative as politically radical or economically reckless as Gov. Cuomo’s proposal for a $15-per-hour statewide minimum wage. Read More

Long Island’s Coming Fiscal Crash

Budget deficits papered over with borrowed money and fiscal gimmicks. Unaffordable union contracts. Pension contributions “amortized” into the future. Retiree health benefits promised but unfunded. Corruption probes and whiffs of scandal. Accountability blurred, responsibility shirked, and hard decisions avoided again and again. That litany could describe any number of old, declining American cities—including a few that, like Detroit, actually went broke. But the same dysfunction exists in affluent corners of New York’s archetypal suburb: Long Island Read More

Albany’s tax-cap gimmick

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and state legislative leaders would have you believe that they just approved "property tax cuts for homeowners," as described in their joint announcement of an end-of-session deal last week. Don't believe them. Read More

Make New York’s property-tax cap permanent — it’s working

As the state legislative session draws to a close, Gov. Cuomo and the state Democratic Committee are launching an online media campaign to push for an extension of his landmark property-tax cap. It’s easy to understand why: Unlike many highly touted policy reforms, the tax cap’s actually working. Which is why it should be made permanent. Read More

New York lawmakers’ three big blown chances

The Legislature is on the verge of following Governor Cuomo's lead by making three big moves in the wrong direction. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.