When New York’s 2 percent cap on local property tax levies was about to become law in June 2011, the statewide teachers union warned of an apocalypse just around the corner.

If enacted, [the cap] would destroy our schools,” said Andy Pallotta, then-vice president of New York State United Teachers (NYSUT).

NYSUT’s newsletter predicted the cap “would be a devastating blow to New York’s public schools.” The union funded television ads claimed the cap would be “disastrous,” and communities “would suffer permanent damage.” It even claimed that capping taxes would cause property values to fall.

Eight years later, New York’s school districts are better funded than ever—still atop national expenditure rankings, now laying out nearly 90 percent more per pupil than the 50-state average. But the rise in school property taxes statewide has slowed by more than two-thirds, to an average of 1.8 percent a year, saving homeowners and businesses billions of dollars in 2018 alone.

All of which is what NYSUT really feared. With less money to spend, school districts became a bit more cautious with public funds and drove harder bargains in contract negotiations. The cap meanwhile helped taxpayers shake the feeling of inevitability that school taxes would keep rising at twice the rate of inflation, if not faster, and restored the expectation that the cost of government shouldn’t rise faster than the cost of everything else.

The cap is flexible: its baseline “allowable levy growth factor” of 2 percent or the rate of inflation, whichever is less, is modified by locally variable exceptions, and can be overridden by a 60 percent vote of district residents. Nonetheless, the teachers union and other advocates of higher school spending contend—in the face of evidence to the contrary—that the law is unduly restrictive.

At present, the long-term fate of the cap is tied to a periodically renewed temporary, and unrelated, state law regulating rents in New York City, next due to expire in mid-June.

With Governor Andrew Cuomo pushing to make the law permanent as part of the next state budget, NYSUT is doubling down on the same old rhetoric—with Pallotta (now union president) claiming the cap “hurts our poorest districts the most.”

If poorer districts are hurting, you sure wouldn’t know it from looking at Auburn, which falls into the state’s classification of lower-wealth, “high need” school systems. Under the cap, Auburn’s school tax levy has risen nearly 16 percent, an average of just over 2 percent a year, and its spending is up 17 percent.

While Auburn is an outlier on the high side of the average school property tax hike since 2011-12, the broader tax and spending data also contradict NYSUT’s claims. As the Empire Center shows in a new report on the tax cap’s impact over the past seven years:

  • On average, spending has risen faster—and taxes have increased more slowly—in low-wealth “high need” districts.
  • Adjusted for enrollment, the average annual tax hike exceeded 3 percent in all but the poorest districts.
  • Thanks largely to exceptions for tax base growth, voter-approved debt payments and a one-time teacher pension cost spike in 2013-14, average taxes for all districts have increased 23 percent faster than the headline “growth factor” would have permitted since 2011-12.

So much for destruction, devastation and permanent damage.

The case against the property tax cap boils down to the argument that the levy limit is making it harder to raise the nation’s highest local property tax burdens. In other words, a highly touted state policy initiative actually has worked. Imagine that.

The tax cap should be made permanent—and the Governor and Legislature should finally turn their attention to repealing and reforming state mandates that are the root cause of local spending. But be forewarned: NYSUT won’t like that, either.

 

About the Author

Ken Girardin

Ken Girardin is the Empire Center’s Director of Strategic Initiatives.

Read more by Ken Girardin

You may also like

New York is looking at an ocean of red ink

New York’s new budget — the actual state-government expenditure plan, that is, as opposed to numerous side issues packaged with it — apparently came in close to Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s bottom line. Read More

Suburban Dems’ first move should be to extend the property tax cap

Urban progressives took over the New York state Senate in November, but the body’s biggest swing group will be suburban Democrats. These Democrats will need to prove themselves to their voters, many of them homeowners in places like Long Island and West­­chester. The most valuable deliverable for the nascent suburban caucus will be a permanent extension of Gov. Cuomo’s property-tax cap. Read More

Long Island’s Coming Fiscal Crash

Budget deficits papered over with borrowed money and fiscal gimmicks. Unaffordable union contracts. Pension contributions “amortized” into the future. Retiree health benefits promised but unfunded. Corruption probes and whiffs of scandal. Accountability blurred, responsibility shirked, and hard decisions avoided again and again. That litany could describe any number of old, declining American cities—including a few that, like Detroit, actually went broke. But the same dysfunction exists in affluent corners of New York’s archetypal suburb: Long Island Read More

Crocodile tears over NY’s tax cap

Long Island town officials are crying the blues over the budgetary squeeze supposedly created by the state’s property-tax cap. They’re not alone: You’ll hear much the same from town pols elsewhere in the metro region and across New York state. But the thrust of their complaints — that the tax cap is somehow blocking urgent public projects and programs — just won’t hold water. Read More

Albany’s tax-cap gimmick

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and state legislative leaders would have you believe that they just approved "property tax cuts for homeowners," as described in their joint announcement of an end-of-session deal last week. Don't believe them. Read More

Make New York’s property-tax cap permanent — it’s working

As the state legislative session draws to a close, Gov. Cuomo and the state Democratic Committee are launching an online media campaign to push for an extension of his landmark property-tax cap. It’s easy to understand why: Unlike many highly touted policy reforms, the tax cap’s actually working. Which is why it should be made permanent. Read More

New York lawmakers’ three big blown chances

The Legislature is on the verge of following Governor Cuomo's lead by making three big moves in the wrong direction. Read More

Lock in tax cap, then address issues that lead to high taxes

There’s a key component missing from Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s plan to “cut” property taxes: It doesn’t cut them at all. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.