Swiss banking giant UBS has announced a new system for awarding bonuses to executives and board members. Although the system does not apply to traders and mid-level bankers, it’s still a useful document. The future iteration of Wall Street is going to rethink its entire bonus structure, including for traders and bankers. The rough blueprint UBS provides, if it and other banks apply something like it more broadly to other employees in the future, could have fiscal implications for New York.

UBS says that in general, it wants future bonuses at the company to be tied to “clear performance criteria … linked to risk-adjusted value creation” over a measurement period that’s longer than the one-year performance period upon which Wall Street has usually awarded its bonuses.

To that end, at the executive and board level, future bonuses at UBS will have two parts: “variable cash compensation” and “variable equity compensation.” UBS will pay out only one-third of the annual cash bonus part for any given year. The rest will be held in escrow, with the next year’s payout of that first year’s bonus to be based partly on that second year’s performance, as well. The bank will be able to claw the money back from the earlier year in the case of poor results, excessive risk-taking, or individual and team performance shortfalls, not just for the first year, but, again, for the second year as well.

Over time, managers and board members would accumulate a permanent cash balance in this escrow account, with the company paying out only 33 percent of that cash balance in any given year. (Managers will have to keep their stock-based compensation for at least three years, as well, before having the right to sell them for cash.)

It seems fair to wonder if New York City and State could tax the entire value of an employee’s annual cash bonus if two-thirds of that cash bonus were held back from the executive by the awarding firm. After all, the bonus still carries a liability for the employee; thus, it is not fully earned income.

If it turned out that New York could tax the value of the bonus only when it was fully dispersed with no remaining liability to the employee beyond lawsuits for fraud, etc. — that is, after the lock-up period had expired — such lags in bonus taxation would reduce income volatility, and thus income-tax volatility, in the city and state.

Consider: in such a case, firms would continue to pay out bonuses in a peak boom year for the two years after the boom year, and the state and city thus would continue to tax those boom-level bonuses during those post-boom years, assuming the firms didn’t claw back the bulk of the prior-year, boom-year bonuses due to employee mistakes or malfeasance. Similarly, bonus payouts and tax collections in the boom years following a bust would be smaller, to account for small cash balances left over from the bust years.

It’s become obvious in the past year or so that the era of huge bonuses on Wall Street may be over for a very long time, not measured in years, but maybe in half-decades or forever-afters. But huge changes in the bonus structure itself could mean that New York has to get used to a different way of taxing these smaller, longer-term bonuses.

You may also like

Sales Tax Receipts Surge Statewide, Filling Local Government Coffers

Local governments across every region of the state raked in robust sales tax collections during the three months that ended on June 30th Read More

Remote Threat 

Remote work and a more mobile professional class will increase the speed and scope of New York's ongoing out migration. Read More

New York’s Hospital Industry Ranks Near the Bottom of Two Quality Report Cards

New York's hospitals remain near the bottom of two quality report cards. The state's hospitals received the lowest rate of any state except Nevada and DC. Read More

Tax hike and huge spending increase seem likely in next NY budget

New York state today began its 2022 fiscal year without an adopted budget—which, in itself, is not a big deal. The state government can continue to pay bills and employee salaries next week if either final appropriations Read More

As a Supreme Court Ruling Loomed, Cuomo Bent His Own Rules on COVID ‘Clusters’

In the midst of the constitutional showdown over his pandemic policies, Governor Cuomo made changes to a disputed Brooklyn 'cluster zone' that seemed to contradict his own declared guidelines. Read More

DiNapoli Predicts $3.8B More in State Tax Receipts

New York State's tax receipts in the current fiscal year will exceed Governor Cuomo's latest projections by $3.8 billion—still down from last year, but a big improvement over the governor's worst-case scenario—according to updated estimates from state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli's office. Read More

With Hopes Dashed for “Blue Wave” Bailout, Cuomo Needs to Deal With Budget Shortfall

With the national election results still unclear, Governor Cuomo can no longer put off tough decisions on how to balance New York's pandemic-ravaged state budget. Read More

For State Lawmakers, Secrecy May Pay

New York state legislators may get a raise on January 1, 2021—but the people who elect them may not get to find out before voting ends next week. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!