A review of federal emergency payments to New York health-care providers reveals a striking disparity: Four of Manhattan’s most prosperous private hospitals collected more individually than the 11 city-owned hospitals combined.

The state’s top recipients in the first round of coronavirus relief funding were New York Presbyterian, $119 million; NYU Langone, $92 million; Memorial Sloan Kettering, $64 million, and Mount Sinai, $54 million. Additional amounts went to affiliated institutions of all four. 

No. 5 on the list was New York City Health + Hospitals, which received a total of $46 million. (See table below. A full listing of New York recipients can be found here.)


This is an installment in a special series of #NYCoronavirus chronicles by Empire Center analysts, focused on New York’s state and local policy response to the Coronavirus pandemic.


Health + Hospitals is a safety-net system of 11 hospitals, five nursing homes and dozens of clinics that treat mostly low-income and uninsured patients, putting it on the front lines of the pandemic response. It includes Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, which drew media attention when it was overwhelmed with coronavirus patients in early April. 

The city hospitals are relatively small individually, but taken together they have 3,200 beds and treated 143,000 inpatients in 2018.

That outstrips New York Presbyterian, the state’s largest hospital, which reported having 2,300 beds and treating 111,000 inpatients in 2018. Yet the city system received less than half as much money.

screen-shot-2020-05-19-at-4-36-26-pm-1700967

Missing from the list is State University of New York-affiliated University Hospital of Brooklyn, which the Cuomo administration designated as a coronavirus-only facility. Two other SUNY hospitals, in Syracuse and Stony Brook, received $20.3 million and $29.3 million, respectively.

These funding incongruities grew out of Washington’s rushed response to the coronavirus crisis. As part of relief legislation approved over the past two months, Congress appropriated $175 billion to reimburse providers, both for costs associated with handling infected patients and for revenue losses triggered by the shutdown and the cancellation of elective procedures.

In the name of moving quickly, the Trump administration chose to distribute an initial $30 billion without taking the time to develop a need-based formula. Instead, it simply paid each provider about 6.2 percent of whatever they had been paid by Medicare in 2019. 

A drawback of this approach is that it tended to shortchange safety-net providers, such as the city-owned hospitals, which treat proportionally fewer Medicare recipients than private hospitals do.

The Medicare-based distribution also lacked any adjustment for the severity of the pandemic in New York compared to other states. To date, New York has seen almost 23 percent of the diagnosed cases and 31 percent of the deaths, but its providers have received just 7 percent of the relief funds.

On a per capita basis, New York’s funding falls in the middle of the pack – just above the nationwide average, but well below low-virus states such as Wyoming and South Dakota (see chart).

provider-relief-7735411
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

 

These allocations will change as HHS continues distributing funds. It distributed $20 billion with a goal, in combination with the first $30 billion, of allocating the combined $50 billion according to in proportion to total net patient revenue – a method that still tends to disadvantage safety-net hospitals.

Other money is to be targeted to providers serving the uninsured, to coronavirus hot spots regions and other categories.

So far, however, the agency’s listing covers payments through May 14 totaling $34 billion.

Of that amount, $2.2 billion flowed to more than 12,000 New York providers, including hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, medical practices and individual doctors.

The largest non-hospital recipient was North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates of Port Jefferson, Long Island, which received $9.8 million.

HHS apparently did not establish a minimum amount for qualified providers. The agency’s listing shows payments as small as $2 each to Nassau Audiological Products of Hempstead, Long Island, and to Paul R. Grout, a pharmacist in Medina, N.Y.

 

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

State Offers Taxpayer-Funded Health Coverage to Unionized Home Care Workers

In a new subsidy for the health-care union 1199 SEIU, the Hochul administration is allowing the union's benefit fund for home care aides to shift some members into taxpayer-funded health coverage through the Essential Plan. Read More

A Closer Look at $4 Billion in State Capital Grants to Health Providers

The state has awarded $4.3 billion in health-care capital grants over the past decade, with a disproportionate share flowing to upstate providers, Health Department records show. Th Read More

Hochul’s Pandemic Study Is a $4.3 Million Flop

The newly released study of New York's coronavirus pandemic response falls far short of what Governor Hochul promised – and the state urgently needs – in the aftermath of its worst natural disaster in modern history. Read More

82 Questions Hochul’s Pandemic Report Should Answer

This is the month when New Yorkers are due to finally receive an official report on the state's response to the Covid-19 pandemic, one of the deadliest disasters in state history. T Read More

Lawmakers Seek To Revive a $10 Fee for Prescriptions That Was Dropped by DFS

A plan to require a $10.18 "dispensing fee" for filling drug prescriptions is back on the table in Albany – this time in the form of legislation rather than regulation. The Read More

How a Medicaid ‘Cut’ Could Lead to More Unionization of Home Care Aides

A money-saving maneuver in the newly enacted Medicaid budget could end up increasing costs in the long term – by paving the way for more unionization of the state's burgeoning home health workforce. Read More

Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending

The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget. Read More

Albany’s New Health Insurance Tax Comes with Few Limits

The newly enacted state budget imposes a multibillion-dollar tax on health insurance without specifying who must pay how much – leaving those basic details to be decided later by the health commissioner in negotiation wit Read More