A bill awaiting Governor Hochul’s signature or veto would make it more difficult for state agencies to outsource work — and would ignore the Lamont Administration’s negative experience with an almost identical statute in neighboring Connecticut.

The proposal (S5356/A8159), among other things, adds a new layer to the state’s acquisition process, requiring agencies to undertake a “cost comparison review” before they can hire an outside business or nonprofit organization to perform $1 million in work over a 12-month period.

The sponsors argue in their bill memo that in many cases consultants “perform work that could be done by professional state employees and the cost of using consultants is substantially higher.” Agencies, they say, should have to show such hiring is “necessary and prudent.”

This redundant step is designed to make it harder to farm out work that would otherwise be done by the state’s heavily unionized workforce. The legislation has been a major priority for public employee unions, who view privatization as a threat to their revenue streams. Each ‘win’ public-sector unions score at the bargaining table tends to make the use of outside contractors incrementally more attractive.

The state’s constantly changing needs often make it preferable to have an outside entity perform state work rather than bringing in new employees or creating entire new departments. Privatization can be particularly attractive because outside firms can be more flexible than state agencies, which must contend with civil service rules and union contracts that make it difficult to modify roles.

The legislation is designed in most instances to create a hurdle, not a brick wall. But in cases where 50 or more employees would be laid off, transferred, or reassigned, the cost-comparison bill would require the state to “provide reasonable resources” for the purpose of “encouraging and assisting” those employees in submitting a rival bid which would potentially prevent the state from contracting.

The fundamental problem there is that businesses and nonprofits risk insolvency and legal action when they make promises they can’t keep. State employees don’t face nearly the same peril, and executive branch officials and potential bidders would be left to sift through dubious claims about the flexibility and efficiency of the state workforce.

A cost-comparison between state employees and a consultant also would presuppose that the costs would end when the contract period ends — something that is far from certain at a government agency.

The proposal borrows language from a similar statute in Connecticut — but doesn’t carry the related warnings. Writing about this and related obstacles to contracting in the Constitution State, consultants hired by the Lamont Administration last year found:

“[Even when processes are followed] agencies face the threat of the union filing lawsuit to halt contract awards and implementation. Such complexity often makes the review process excessively complicated for individual agencies, disincentivizes bidders, and delays vendor selection and project execution. Many agencies have found it difficult to even contract out work for which state employees lacked the skills or expertise to perform safely. For example, it took 4 years for CTDOT to contract out maintenance of movable bridges despite the fact that the existing workers had no experience in this area.”

Outsourcing is not a panacea. Profit-motivated contractors aren’t necessarily worried about giving the state the best deal—but then again, neither are the state’s public employee unions, which only make money when government employees get paid. The shift at agencies to remote work has made it easier to imagine tasks being completed somewhere outside the four walls of state buildings, making new obstacles to privatization more urgent.

Governor Andrew Cuomo vetoed cost-comparison legislation three times between its introduction in 2012 and his 2021 departure. His veto message in 2020 pointed out that the process was not only duplicative but also risked slowing the contract award process.

This bill — despite having a typographical error — twice passed the Senate unanimously, in June 2021 and May 2022, and passed the Assembly with just ten negatives votes near the end of the 2022 session. Governor Hochul has until Wednesday, December 28 to veto it.

You may also like

Mayors and School Leaders Face Punishing New Discipline Rules

A state Senate committee on Wednesday approved legislation weakening the ability of local government and school officials to discipline workers Read More

A Politically Active Medical Group Gains Access to Funds for ‘Distressed’ Providers

A politically connected medical group in the Bronx garnered an unusual benefit in the new state budget – access to money previously reserved for financially troubled safety-net hospitals and nursing homes. Read More

Union Pressure Aims to Hit Home

Lawmakers are considering legislation that would force school districts and local governments to tell unions where their workers live. Read More

Budget deal increases state-share Medicaid spending by 13 percent

(This post has been updated to correct errors.) Albany's newly enacted budget appears to increase the state share of Medicaid spending by $4.2 billion or 13 percent, contin Read More

Albany’s Belated Budget Binge 

State lawmakers have begun passing the bills necessary to implement the state budget for the fiscal year that began April 1. Read More

No Need to Rush Now

The passage of a state budget bill should be a thorough, transparent and democratic process that allows for ample public input and discussion. Read More

The Health Department Releases a Fuller Accounting of COVID’s Deadly First Year

The state Health Department has belatedly published a more complete COVID death count for the pandemic's first year, accounting for more than 6,000 victims who were left out of the state's previous tallies because they died Read More

Hochul chief judge nominee stands up for rights—including elephant’s

Governor Hochul has turned to a Court of Appeals associate judge whose case file includes a 70-page opinion arguing that an elephant should have the legal right to petition for release from the Bronx Zoo. Read More

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!