ws-150x150-1-9232373While legislative leaders and Governor Cuomo were cooking up a budget deal in Albany, the New York City Independent Budget Office (IBO) was issuing five years’ worth of updated statistics showing how heavily the city already depends on the volatile earnings of taxpayers at the top of the income pyramid.

In 2013, the highest-earning 1 percent of city residents—those with adjusted gross income (AGI) of at least $636,866—earned 38 percent of adjusted gross income and accounted for 47 percent of city income tax liability, according to the IBO stats.  The same group of filers paid 54 percent of the state income tax paid by residents of the city, the IBO data said.

The distribution of the combined city and state taxes was very progressive, as shown below.


Other key takeaways:

  • The lowest-earning 50 percent of New York City tax filers had 5.8 percent of total AGI and paid net negative taxes of 0.2 percent of total income.  Two-thirds of that bottom 50 percent of city residents (income cutoff of $29,133) paid no city or state income tax.  Sixty-eight percent of city income tax filers earned less than $50,000, and half of them owed no tax.
  • The higher you go on the income scale, the larger the share of income came from capital gains on investments. Between 2009 and 2013, two-thirds of the net growth in AGI for filers in the top 1 percent originated in “realized capital gains.”
  • Capital gains accounted for 86 percent of the growth in AGI for the top one-tenth of 1 percent—those earning at least $10 million. Added capital gains were the main reason why there were 498 more filers in that category in 2013 than in 2009, following the recession and stock market crash.
  • The top 1 percent pay average city income taxes of $105,924—$106 million for every 1,000 filers.  Those earning $10 million and above paid an average of $1,294,769 in city income taxes. To put it another way, if just 100 of these 1,315 super-high earners (as of 2013) went broke or moved away, the city could lose about $130 million in revenues.

From my Feb. 2 state budget testimony:

There are clear risks associated with depending so heavily on such a small number of taxpayers. It means that when high-income households have a bad year, the entire state suffers inordinate fiscal stress. It has happened before, and it could happen again soon enough.

For fiscal 2017, the budget projects a 5.3 percent increase in the capital gains income of New York residents—based in part on the assumption that the S&P 500 will grow by 2.2 percent during calendar year 2016.   Given the market’s slump however, the S&P will need to rebound by at least 6 percent over the next 11 months to hit the budget’s target. Of course, that could happen, but there’s less reason to be optimistic now than there was a year ago.

In the fourth quarter of 2015, the state Labor Department’s Index of Coincident Economic indicators registered its first two-consecutive-month decline since the end of the recession. Subsequent statistical adjustments may change that—as happened in fact, a year ago, but it’s nonetheless a yellow flag. Another yellow flag: the New York Federal Reserve reports that, in December, its own Index of Coincident Economic indicators for New York State decreased at an annual rate of 0.4 percent.

Tax policy should reflect economic reality even as it seeks to improve the economic outlook. We need to carefully rebalance the distribution of New York’s tax burden with the twin goals of making the state more competitive and protecting against economic shocks, which are inevitable sooner or later.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.

The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More