New York State’s main pension fund investment pool earned 10 percent in its third quarter and has gained nearly 30 percent since the end of its 2020 fiscal year, according to state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, the fund’s sole trustee.

As of December 31, DiNapoli reported, the Common Retirement Fund stood at $248 billion, up from $194 billion as of last March 31, a net increase of $54 billion that reflects a combination of investment earnings, benefits paid out, and contributions by employers and employees during that period. The Fund supports pensions paid to members of the New York State and Local Retirement System, which covers all state and local government employees outside New York City except teachers and administrators.

With 55 percent of its assets invested in publicly traded domestic equities, the pension fund rode a stock-market roller coaster from last February’s all-time highs, to a sickening vertical drop in the early stage of the pandemic last March, breaking back to a series of new highs since late last summer.

From the comptroller’s news release:

“Continued growth in the stock market has added to the state pension fund’s dramatic increases this year,” DiNapoli said. “More importantly, given the ongoing market volatility, our pension fund is strong and well-diversified and ready to meet any ups and downs. Investment gains will remain fragile until we overcome the COVID-19 pandemic and see more federal stimulus bolstering the broader economy. We will continue to manage investments with caution and with a long-term perspective that has been the foundation of our success.”

He should have inserted a period after the word “fragile,” given the extraordinarily heavy debt load falling on the post-pandemic economy.

The Common Retirement Fund bases all of its funding calculations on the assumption that it will earn an annual return of 6.8 percent—which, in turn, is the discount rate used to calculate the value of benefits that must be paid in the future.

Even if there is no further improvement in stock prices over the next seven weeks, the pension fund’s return in the fiscal year is on track to exceed 30 percent, a marked reversal of last year’s 2.66 percent loss. In that case, as illustrated below, something truly noteworthy will have happened: the pension fund’s actual 20-year total return on investment will have finally caught up with and slightly surpassed the system’s long-term return assumptions for the first time since just before the Great Recession bear market of 2007-09.

In reality, of course, roller coasters don’t climb indefinitely, any more than trees keep growing to the stratosphere. The current surge in stock prices won’t last. The only question is whether it all ends in a crash, or a mere 10 percent correction followed by a new bull market, or the kind of long-term stagnation experienced in the 1970s, when the Dow gained less than 5 percent before adjusting for inflation.

When the pandemic-induced tidal wave of Federal Reserve liquidity is exhausted and all the money in the Biden administration’s forthcoming $1.9 trillion stimulus federal stimulus bill has been spent—some of it, inevitably, to boost already generous compensation levels for public employees in New York—the economy and financial system could be left with a tremendous hangover.

In fact, all things considered, this would be a good time for New York’s state and local pension fund to begin ratcheting down its reliance on stocks and re-setting the assumptions used for funding purposes. It should:

  • shift its recent gains to lower-earning but less risky and volatile fixed-income investments, including highly rated bonds, and
  • approve a corresponding further reduction in its discount rate.

The current discount rate of 6.8 percent is low by American pension fund standards—but not compared to more stringently regulated American private single-employer funds, or to public funds in other countries. For example, Canada’s highly regarded Ontario Teachers Pension Plan uses a discount rate of 4.65 percent. The Society of Actuaries has recommended that public pension discount rates “should be based primarily on the current risk-free rate plus explicit risk premia or on other similar forward-looking techniques,” which in current conditions would translate into a rate of 4 to 5 percent.

Lower discount rates will also translate into higher required pension fund contributions by employers—i.e., higher costs for taxpayers—which will more accurately reflect the true cost of guaranteeing ample retirement benefits to public employees.

In the meantime, taxpayers and public employers, go ahead and enjoy the ride—but hold onto your hats.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.

The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More