cuomo_250x-239x300-9931912Governor Cuomo’s warnings about how repealing the Affordable Care Act would affect New York should be read with caution.

On Wednesday – as the U.S. Senate took its first step toward unwinding Obamacare – Cuomo’s office said ACA repeal would cause 2.7 million New Yorkers to lose coverage and cost the state budget $3.7 billion.

But those two numbers are based on conflicting assumptions about how the repeal process will play out – a nuance that his press release did not make clear, but which Health Department officials explained later.

The officials raised the possibility that repeal could have dramatic and unintended consequences for the state’s Medicaid program. Unlike most other states, New York expanded its version of Medicaid going back years before the ACA. It did so under a series of waivers granted by the federal Department of Health and Human Services, which were superseded when the new law took effect in 2014.

Thus, if Washington repeals Obamacare without reinstating a waiver, New York’s Medicaid eligibility rules could revert to the pre-waiver baseline, officials said.

Currently, New York’s program covers most adults with children up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, and childless able-bodied adults up to 100 percent of FPL. Under a scenario in which the ACA is repealed and no waiver is granted, eligibility for adults with children could be limited to 94 percent of FPL, and able-bodied childless adults would no longer qualify at all.

That would end coverage for 1.9 million New Yorkers, officials said.

Another 220,000 people would lose access to private coverage they have purchased through New York’s ACA exchange, and 586,000 would lose coverage under the Essential Plan, a low-cost, government-funded health plan that was an optional benefit under Obamacare.

Other analyses of ACA repeal have assumed that Medicaid eligibility would revert to what it was in 2013.

Previous estimates by the Urban Institute and Charles Gaba of ACASignups.net have projected that 1.1 million New Yorkers would lose coverage under that scenario. [UPDATE: Charles Gaba has revised his estimate to 2.5 million.]

For its budget impact analysis, by contrast, the Cuomo administration assumed that New York would continue covering all or most of the people currently enrolled in Medicaid and the Essential Plan – without the benefit of extra federal aid that the ACA provided. In that case, the state would have to put up $3.7 billion or more of its own funds, officials said.

That number is roughly consistent with my own estimate and with that of state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

A Politically Active Medical Group Gets $29 Million in ‘Distressed’ Provider Funds

State officials awarded $29 million in 'distressed' provider funding to a politically active medical group in the Bronx, state records confirm. a network of physicians and other he Read More

Albany Lawmakers Push a $4 Billion Tax on Health Insurance

Legislative leaders are proposing an additional $4 billion tax on health insurance plans in the upcoming state budget – but withholding specifics of how it would work. Read More

Loss of Patients and Revenue Foreshadowed Downsizing for SUNY Downstate

The SUNY-owned hospital in Brooklyn facing a newly announced downsizing plan has seen its patient volume and revenue plunge over the past decade, according to a review of its financial reports. Read More

How a Medicaid Program To Improve Nursing Home Care Ended Up Paying for Union Benefits

New York State's budget-making process sometimes works like a closed loop, as interest groups on the receiving end of state spending reinvest a portion of their proceeds to lobby Albany for still more money. Read More

How Eliminating the Medicaid ‘Gap’ Would Perpetuate Inequity in Hospital Funding

A change in Medicaid reimbursement currently being pushed by New York's hospital industry appears likely to benefit high-end hospitals proportionally more than safety-net institutions, a review of hospitals' financial repor Read More

Hochul’s ‘Straight Talk’ on Medicaid Isn’t Straight Enough

Arguably the biggest Medicaid news in Governor Hochul's budget presentation was about the current fiscal year, not the next one: The state-run health plan is running substantially over budget. Read More

Despite Lingering Shortages, New York’s Health-Care Workforce Is Bigger Than Ever

The state's health-care workforce is recovering unevenly from the pandemic, with persistently lower employment levels in some areas and robust growth in others. This mixed pattern c Read More

The Wacky Math of New York’s Essential Plan

Thanks to an absurdly wasteful federal law, New York's Essential Plan is expected to continue running billion-dollar surpluses even as state officials more than double its spending over the next several years. Read More