Governor Paterson now says he will veto “any legislation this year that calls for more spending.” Well, that’s a relief. But what does he mean by “spending”?
Will he limit the definition to bills that have a direct, short-term cash impact on the state budget only? Or will he broaden his view to include a wider range of legislation with long-term implications for both the state and local governments, such as pension sweeteners and labor-backed modifications to collective bargaining regulations?
For example, the governor just recently signed the 2009 edition of an annual measure restricting the ability of school districts to economize on expensive retiree health benefits.
This is one of many ways the state limits the ability of local districts to restrain the costs that drive New York’s sky-high property taxes, about which Paterson also claims to be concerned. Why shouldn’t schools be allowed to implement the same sort of retiree health benefit reforms the governor himself unsuccessfully proposed for state employees in his budget this year?
Meanwhile, Paterson keeps pushing his proposal for a statutory cap on state spending–which the Legislature could remove at any time, like a pair of toy police handcuffs.
But the governor has had the power to control spending all along–the line-item veto, found in Article VII, Section 4 of the state Constitution. While former Governor George Pataki couldn’t make his budget vetoes stick, Paterson is in a much different situation, since the narrowly divided Senate and its fractious Democratic majority actually work in his favor.
David Paterson: human spending cap. If only.
About the Author
You may also like
How 1199 Earns its Reputation as Albany’s No. 1 Labor Power Broker
For the fourth time in six years, the president of New York's largest health-care union, George Gresham of 1199SEIU, has won the top spot on the "Labor Power 100" list from City &am Read More
New York Runs Away from the Pack on Medicaid Spending
New York's per capita Medicaid spending jumped 14 percent in 2023, moving it further ahead of the rest of the country, recently released nationwide data show.
In the federal fiscal year that ended last September, New York spent $95.6 billion on Medicai Read More
Hochul’s ‘Straight Talk’ on Medicaid Isn’t Straight Enough
Arguably the biggest Medicaid news in Governor Hochul's budget presentation was about the current fiscal year, not the next one: The state-run health plan is running substantially over budget.
Read More
New York’s Medicaid Spending Is Running Billions Over Budget
New York's Medicaid program ran billions of dollars over budget during the first half of the fiscal year, adding to signs of a brewing fiscal crisis in Albany.
According to the fro Read More
Hospital Lobby’s TV Campaign Spreads Misinformation About Medicaid
As New York's health-care industry agitates for more money from the state budget, two of its most influential lobbying groups are airing TV ads that make alarmist and inaccurate claims about Medicaid. Read More
Hochul’s ‘Pay and Resolve’ Push for Hospitals Triggers Déjà Vu
Two years ago last week, I wrote in the Daily News about how then-Governor Andrew Cuomo was pushing a costly change to insurance law on behalf of a hospital group that had supported his campaign through a fund-rai Read More
The Looming Collapse of a Long-Term Care Insurer Raises Questions for DFS
As the Hochul administration presses for the creation of a "guaranty fund" to bail out failed health insurers, the state is quietly moving to seize a small company that could be the fund's first target. Read More
Hochul puts Medicaid spending on a steeper slope
Governor Hochul is releasing the brakes on Medicaid, allowing state spending on the safety-net health plan to increase more than twice as fast as it typically did during the Cuomo administration.
Read More