cuomo_250x-150x150-9690239“Spending cap?  What spending cap?”  In effect, that’s the state Assembly’s opening public bid in state budget negotiations with Gov. Andrew Cuomo for the fiscal year that starts April 1.

Starting his second year in office, Cuomo has stuck to a self-imposed cap of 2 percent on annual growth in the state operating funds budget (excluding federal grants and capital spending).  The result has been consistently lower levels of spending growth, as shown below.

screen-shot-2016-03-14-at-4-11-06-pm-1024x630-3882590

Cuomo’s proposed 2017 budget would boost spending by 1.7 percent. To be sure, the governor cuts corners to get to that figure; at the margins, his Executive Budget stayed below 2 percent not by holding down spending but by offloading it, most notably through a shift of about $500 million in (state fiscal year) costs for Medicaid and City University (CUNY) senior colleges. On the other hand, the governor’s budget includes a K-12 school aid increase with a state fiscal year impact of $700 million, or 3 percent; on a school-year basis, the increase comes to $1 billion, or 4 percent.

The Assembly’s Democratic majority, however, wants to boost the state operating funds portion of the budget by another $1.9 billion—a 3.7 percent increase, according to its summary memorandum. The Assembly’s additional spending consists mainly of higher school aid (a whopping 9 percent increase on a school year basis) and a reversal of the proposed CUNY and Medicaid shifts for New York City.

Unlike the Assembly, Senate Republicans did not issue a memorandum summarizing the net fiscal impacts of their budget resolution. The Senate’s official press release asserts that the upper chamber’s one-house plan “stays within the self-imposed two-percent spending cap”—but that’s hard to immediately confirm, based on the summary in the Senate’s one-house budget resolution. The Senate proposals include a school aid increase totaling at least $700 million on a fiscal year basis—enough, all by itself, to boost spending closer to 3 percent. (The resolution uses multiple figures, some possibly duplicative, without explaining whether they represent state fiscal year or school year totals.)

Just two months ago, the same Senate Majority was approving a plan to codify Cuomo’s state spending cap—and then some—by holding state operating spending below the three-year average inflation rate, which would come to 1.27 percent in fiscal 2017.  Nonetheless, if the Senate’s one-house plan somehow comes in under 2 percent growth, it almost certainly does not come in as low as 1.27 percent.  (Memo to Senate: if you’re going to make such a big deal of proposing a spending cap, you should at least show how you would actually abide by it, if only for illustrative purposes.)

In another move that will push total spending above the cap, both houses refused to go along with Cuomo proposal for workers’ compensation reforms that would also have required the State Insurance Fund (SIF) to reduce the state government’s workers’ compensation premium by $375 million over the next three years, including $140 million next year.

Both houses also rejected the governor’s proposal to shift the Canal Corp. to the Power Authority, which was Cuomo’s pretext for eliminating a $85 million operating subsidy of the Thruway Authority. The Senate restored the full subsidy.

As it happens, the Legislature was right to reject these proposals—but they should have acknowledged and offset the total added cost of $225 million in their budget resolution summaries.

In a move that affects capital rather than operating expenses, both houses also rejected Cuomo’s proposal to utterly waste spend $113 million a year over the next three years on income tax credits to reimburse New York drivers for half of their toll expenses exceeding $50 a year.  The Assembly retained $15 million in toll credits for farmers only, while the Senate rejected the entire idea. Since the money to fund the credit would have come from bank settlement windfall revenues, the Legislature presumably want to reprogram the money for infrastructure purposes—although that, too, was not clear from the one-house memos.

Stay tuned for more.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Remembering the scandal that brought down Health Commissioner Howard Zucker

The resignation of Dr. Howard Zucker as state health commissioner marks the end of a term marred by scandal over his role in managing the coronavirus pandemic. The much-debated compelling nursing homes to admit COVID-positive patients, though it origi Read More

After 10 weeks, all but five of the Empire Center’s 63 requests for pandemic data remain unfulfilled

Over the 10 days that Hochul has been in office, there has been no further progress on the Empire Center's record requests. Read More

New York’s health benefits remain the second-costliest in the U.S.

New York's health benefit costs increased faster than the national average in 2020, leaving it with the second-least affordable coverage in the U.S. The state's average total cost f Read More

Another Hochul To-Do: Timely Financial Reporting

The state will spend a record $212 billion in the current 2022 Fiscal Year, under the budget its elected leaders adopted in April. Read More

Can Cuomo still be impeached?

Andrew Cuomo and Donald Trump have more in common than boyhood homes in Queens. Like Trump, Cuomo could still face impeachment and an impeachment trial despite a promise to resign as Governor later this month. Read More

The Gov’s pension

There are several (dozens? hundreds?) of unanswered questions as the fallout from Andrew Cuomo's resignation earlier today continues. Among those are questions related to his pension, some of which can be answered, sort of. Read More

The Health Department’s FOIL Responses Signal an Indefinite Wait for Pandemic Data

The quest for comprehensive data on New York's coronavirus pandemic hit a bureaucratic roadblock this week Read More

A Study of COVID-19 in Nursing Homes Raises Doubt About New York’s Minimum Staffing Law

A newly published study of COVID-19 in nursing homes links larger numbers of employees to higher rates of infection and death for residents – raising fresh doubts about New York's recently enacted "safe staffing" law. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!