Governor Paterson’s proposed “obesity tax” on sugared soft drinks has already captured most of the media attention among the $4 billion in new taxes and fees in Governor Paterson’s budget.  But by far the largest single element in Paterson’s revenue package is a $652 million increase in the state’s existing “assessment” on utilities.  Any such increase will ultimately be borne by utility ratepayers, adding $652 million to what are already some of the highest energy costs in the nation.

The assessment, authorized under Section 18-A of the Public Service Law and dating back to the 1930s, was established as a nominal charge to support the operations of the state Public Service Commission.  Since the 1990s it has been expanded to provide dedicated funding for units of nine additional state agencies — including some far afield of energy policy, such as the Office of Real Property Services and the Department of Homeland Security.

The Section 18-A assessment is currently pegged at 0.33 percent of gross receipts and raises $120 million a year.  Paterson’s budget would temporarily raise the rate to 2 percent of gross receipts, a 643 percent increase, and deposit the added $652 million in the general fund.   After three years, the assessment would subside to a new permanent level of 1 percent of gross receipts.

If adopted, Paterson’s proposal would essentially resurrect the state’s old gross receipts tax, which was phased out in 2000.  Downstate and metropolitan New York City area customers of Consolidated Edison and National Grid (formerly KeySpan), would pay the bulk of the increase.

You may also like

Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy

  New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More

Hochul Pushes New Energy Tax Past Next Election

Governor Hochul has further delayed what amounts to a tax on energy until after the next general election.  Almost six years after the state adopted an aggressive emissions-cutting Read More

New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected

The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More

How 1199 Earns its Reputation as Albany’s No. 1 Labor Power Broker

For the fourth time in six years, the president of New York's largest health-care union, George Gresham of 1199SEIU, has won the top spot on the "Labor Power 100" list from City &am Read More

New York Runs Away from the Pack on Medicaid Spending

New York's per capita Medicaid spending jumped 14 percent in 2023, moving it further ahead of the rest of the country, recently released nationwide data show. In the federal fiscal year that ended last September, New York spent $94.6 billion Read More

Hochul’s ‘Straight Talk’ on Medicaid Isn’t Straight Enough

Arguably the biggest Medicaid news in Governor Hochul's budget presentation was about the current fiscal year, not the next one: The state-run health plan is running substantially over budget. Read More

New York’s Medicaid Spending Is Running Billions Over Budget

New York's Medicaid program ran billions of dollars over budget during the first half of the fiscal year, adding to signs of a brewing fiscal crisis in Albany. According to the fro Read More

Another battery flop zaps NY taxpayers

Plans to lure a Canadian battery company to the Hudson Valley with a slew of government incentives, including job-creation tax credits, loans, and federal subsidies, appear to be a dud. It’s a reminder that when it comes to picking winners in the energy-storage space, taxpayers are often losers. Read More