Nicole has an op-ed in today’s New York Post exploring the fiscal and economic implications of the agenda being pushed by the union-led “May 12 Coalition,” which is sponsoring a big demonstration in Manhattan today to demand big increases in state and city taxes.
The group comprises the usual suspects — the United Federation of Teachers, the Transport Workers Union, the big health-care unions, the Coalition for the Homeless, etc.
No surprise: People who depend on big government want bigger government. The $49.7 billion that [Mayor] Bloomberg will spend next year — up 11.2 percent from the year before — isn’t enough. The coalition has catalogued every “devastating” budget cut, from the $515 million the mayor would save by cutting 6,000 teachers to $250,000 off a “homeless prevention fund.”
The coalition has a “solution”: Sock it to the wealthy. They want a return of the state’s temporary “millionaire’s tax,” which Gov. Cuomo allowed to expire. A year from now, the coalition says, the higher tax rate would bring in $5 billion — with about $1.9 billion going to the city.
The problem, she notes, is that “When you tax something, you get less of it — sometimes so much less that a higher tax rate brings in fewer tax dollars.” That’s already happening with the city’s cigarette tax–which has risen in stages from $1.19 per pack in 2002 to $5.85 per pack since last year, and is now raising less money.
And, as Nicole says, unlike smokers’ attachment to their Marlboros, high-income taxpayers aren’t necessarily addicted to living in New york.
You may also like
Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!