screen-shot-2014-10-30-at-10-30-56-am-150x150-6905501Calling it an “oppressive unfunded mandate” that would impose $57 million in “near term obligations” on local governments across New York State, Governor Cuomo has vetoed a bill that would have allowed public employees to claim up to three years worth of pension service credit for time spent in military duty.

The ability to purchase up to three years of potentially valuable pension credit time is available to all state and local workers honorably discharged from the military from World War II through 1975, and to veterans of specific combat theaters including Grenada, Panama, and the Middle East, but not yet to veterans of Somalia, the Balkans or Afghanistan, among other more recent conflicts. The bill passed by the Legislature would have permanently extended this right to all honorably discharged veterans, regardless of when or where they served.

As noted here, the bill was one of several pension sweeteners passed by huge margins (57-4 in Senate, 133-1 in Assembly) in the final days of the legislative session in June. The Senate, which controlled the measure, chose to send it to the governor’s desk on Oct. 29, less than a week before the election. The 10-day deadline meant the governor would have to act before Veteran’s Day if he wanted to block the measure.

If that timing was meant to jam Cuomo, it obviously didn’t work.  While the governor’s office press office tried to minimize attention paid to the veto message, releasing it late Friday afternoon, the message didn’t mince words.  

To create a financial disincentive for future pension sweeteners, Cuomo’s Tier 6 “pension reform” of 2012 had included language requiring that the full cost of any retirement benefit increase for state and local employees to be paid out of the state budget. Nonetheless, the veterans’ pension credit legislation would have required localities to eat the cost for their eligible employees. For that reason, it was opposed by the New York City mayor’s office, the state Conference of Mayors and the Association of Counties.

“If enacted, this bill would run rough-shod over systemic reforms carefully negotiated with the Legislature to avoid saddling local property taxpayers with additional unmanageable burdens,” Cuomo said.  

The bill is expensive, with a total projected net present value of hundreds of millions of dollars in the long term, because veterans could “buy” aded pension credit at a very steep discount relative to true costs, putting most of the burden on taxpayers. Such a proposal, Cuomo concluded, “should be raised only in the broader context of negotiating the state budget.” 

Beyond the immediately affected group of veterans, the veto sends an encouraging signal that Cuomo will take a hard line against other pension sweeteners passed by the Legislature this year — including a bill, not yet sent to the governor’s desk, resurrecting early retirement for uniformed court officers hired since 2012.

Judging from some emails received by the Empire Center last week after this NYTorch post raised questions about the bill, Cuomo will now be accused in some quarters of lacking patriotism and of disrespecting veterans.  In fact, he has earned a Veteran’s Day salute from taxpayers throughout the state — a group which, of course, includes veterans themselves. 

You may also like

Hochul’s Pushing Affordability. It Would Cost A Lot.

Governor Hochul is hammering an “affordability” theme in the leadup to Tuesday's 2025 State of the State address. But her campaign, dubbed "Money In Your Pockets," has so far featured little that would reduce the cost of providing, and therefore buying, goods or services in New York. Instead, the biggest announced and expected elements reflect Albany's waning interest in growing the state economy—and a greater appetite to redistribute what it produces. Read More

Unions Reprogram NYS To Do Less With More

Governor Hochul on Saturday signed an innocuous-sounding bill to “regulate the use of automated decision-making systems and artificial intelligence techniques by state agencies.” But the “Legislative Oversight of Automated Decision-making in Government,” or LOADinG Act, wasn’t about protecting New York from self-aware computers trying to wipe out humanity. Instead, it was an early Christmas present for the state's public employee unions—and a lump of coal for New Yorkers hoping for more efficient state government. Read More

Former Utility Regulator Warns State Lawmakers They’re On the Naughty List

A legislative hearing into spending by the state’s sprawling energy agency featured a surprise guest who offered sober warnings about Albany’s energy policy. Read More

New York’s Public Employee Shortage Is Over

Public employee unions complained loudly when New York's state government workforce shrank during the coronavirus pandemic, using that decrease as pretext to press Governor Hochul and state lawmakers for more hiring and costly giveaways to benefit their members. But the latest data show nearly every state agency has more employees than it did a year ago, and that by at least one key measure, the state workforce is larger than it was before COVID. Read More

Upstate Insurance Customers Pay the Price for Medicare’s Hospital Rate Hike

A billion-dollar Medicare windfall for upstate hospitals has turned into a crisis for upstate health insurers that's threatening to disrupt coverage for millions of New Yorkers. The Read More

Hochul Wants To Spend The Same Billions Twice

Governor Hochul’s plan to mail $500 checks to millions of households has a problem: the sales tax “surplus” she wants to dish out doesn't exist. Read More

How Will A Major Milk Plant Fit Under NY’s Climate Limits? It Won’t.

Plans to build a milk-processing facility in Monroe County were announced last year to great fanfare but with few details on how such an energy-intensive operation could fit within Albany’s strict climate rules poised to hit homes and businesses. The answer: it won’t have to. Read More

New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected

The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More