cuomo-signs-300x200-5808470Governor Andrew Cuomo has signed a bill mandating broad insurance coverage for three-dimensional mammography, formally known as digital breast tomosynthesis, despite a lack of evidence about the long-term efficacy of the procedure.

The legislation—previously discussed here and herefits a pattern of Albany writing coverage requirements into statute without careful, independent analysis of the costs and benefits.

Cuomo clarified in his approval memo, however, that the law “does not remove an insurer’s ability to review breast tomosynthesis for medical necessity.” This would leave plans at least some wiggle room to prevent overuse.

Tomosynthesis combines multiple X-ray images of a breast into a single three-dimensional composite. Though clinical studies show that technology is better at finding potential tumors, and less likely to result in false alarms, there is not yet long-term research to show whether it saves lives or otherwise improves outcomes. For this reason, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has declined to issue a recommendation either for or against the use of 3D mammography as a screening procedure for breast cancer.

The Cuomo administration previously issued regulatory guidance declaring that insurers must cover tomosynthesis “when medically necessary.” The bill sponsored by Assemblywoman Rebecca Seawright (D-Manhattan) and Senator Joe Griffo (R-Rome) appears to go further. It adds tomosynthesis to an existing mammography mandate that requires coverage for a “baseline” screening between 35 and 39, then annual screenings starting at age 40. It also makes no mention of medical necessity.

The New York Health Plan Association, which opposed the bill, raised concern that the more expensive 3D technology would “replace traditional mammography as the frontline screening for breast cancer” and contribute to rising healthcare costs.

However, if plans may still review the procedure for medical necessity—as Cuomo’s memo asserts—it’s not clear how much difference the new statute will make.

Also limiting the impact of the bill—as with all such state mandates—is the fact that it applies mainly to non-group and small-group policies. Most large employers are “self-insured” and thereby exempt under federal law. States also have no authority to regulate Medicare.

The Cuomo administration announced in August that 3D mammograms would be covered by the state’s Medicaid health plan for the poor and disabled.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

The 411 On New York’s 911 Skim

New York for decades has collected, under various names, a special tax on mobile phones. The tax, which today shows up on customer bills as the “public safety communications surcharge,” devolved from being a fee to pay for 911 services to a general revenue source with 911 services as a near second thought. Since 2009, almost half the surcharges paid by customers for public safety communications—more than $1 billion—have been redirected to New York’s general fund. Read More

Immigrant Enrollment in ‘Emergency Medicaid’ Surges to 480,000

One of the biggest drivers of New York's Medicaid enrollment growth over the past decade has been "emergency Medicaid" for undocumented immigrants, newly released state records show. Read More

Medicaid’s Missing Million

The Health Department has been either unable or unwilling to document the eligibility status of almost one million Medicaid recipients, raising further concern about the possibility of large-scale over-enrollment. Read More

New York’s Medicaid Spiral Is Worse Than Hochul Admitted

Although Governor Hochul said last week that the current trajectory of Medicaid spending is "not sustainable," the upward trend is even steeper than she and her budget director have acknowledged. Read More

NY’s Road To Electric School Buses Gets Bumpy

New York in 2022 told school districts they’d be barred from purchasing gasoline- or diesel-powered buses after 2027, and instead have to buy electric buses at more than double the upfront cost. “The purchase of new electric buses will help grow the market,” officials later pledged, “which will in turn help reduce prices.” Unfortunately for taxpayers, those reductions aren’t materializing—because state officials put the prices, and future increases, on cruise control. Read More

Hochul Shows a Jarring Lack of Direction on Health Care

Financing and regulating health care delivery is one of the biggest responsibilities of state government, yet Governor Hochul had remarkably little to say on that topic in her State of the State speech on Tuesday. Read More

Hochul’s Pushing Affordability. It Would Cost A Lot.

Governor Hochul is hammering an “affordability” theme in the leadup to Tuesday's 2025 State of the State address. But her campaign, dubbed "Money In Your Pockets," has so far featured little that would reduce the cost of providing, and therefore buying, goods or services in New York. Instead, the biggest announced and expected elements reflect Albany's waning interest in growing the state economy—and a greater appetite to redistribute what it produces. Read More

Unions Reprogram NYS To Do Less With More

Governor Hochul on Saturday signed an innocuous-sounding bill to “regulate the use of automated decision-making systems and artificial intelligence techniques by state agencies.” But the “Legislative Oversight of Automated Decision-making in Government,” or LOADinG Act, wasn’t about protecting New York from self-aware computers trying to wipe out humanity. Instead, it was an early Christmas present for the state's public employee unions—and a lump of coal for New Yorkers hoping for more efficient state government. Read More