Did Governor David Paterson forget why he vetoed a bill that virtually locks in health benefits for retired state and local government employees? Or does he believe retired teachers are more deserving?

The Tier 5 bill, which promises more than it delivers, goes beyond creating a new pension tier for future employees. It makes permanent a temporary law that says financially-strapped school districts cannot modify lifetime health benefits of retired teachers–unless its teachers union agrees with imposing the same reductions on current teachers.

In September 2008, Paterson vetoed a similar one-year moratorium that would have applied to all retired state and local government employees, not just teachers. In May 2009, he signed a bill extending a temporary moratorium for retired teachers for another year.

In his veto message, Paterson wrote the bill could thwart” legitimate efforts to change retiree health benefits in ways that reflect their unique status, or reasonably improve efficiency.”

He pointed out while many retirees are eligible for Medicare, most active employees are not.

Yet under this bill, even if a corresponding change in active employee benefits is unwarranted due to their different circumstances, one would have to be made (if possible) before any change for retirees could be effectuated. Further, efforts by a public employer to save retiree health care costs by increasing the role of managed care,or by requiring that certain purchases be made through a network, could also be subject to court challenges as diminutions of benefits.

After vetoing the bill, Paterson appointed a 15-member Task Force on Public Retiree Health Benefits, chaired by Richard A. Berman, president of Manhattanville College. It was supposed to report in June 2009.

So where is the taskforce report? Was it written in invisible ink? Or did Paterson forget about the taskforce just as he’s forgotten about his veto of the retiree health bill a year ago?

As reported here earlier, the bill Paterson vetoed would have no fiscal impact for the state and local government.

It ignores the fact that post-retirement health benefits are consuming an increasing portion of local budgets. For example, in 2005-06, the city of Syracuse spent $27 million on health benefits for retired municipal and school district employees–equivalent to 30 cents of every local property tax dollar collected that year.

Originally Published: NY Public Payroll Watch

You may also like

Meanwhile, on the mandate relief front

Governor Cuomo’s 2012-13 budget, to be presented later today, will command media attention for the rest of the week. Advance reports on his modified pension reform proposal are especially promising. Meanwhile, there’s a (fiscally) cost-free approach to helping local governments and school districts alleviate their budget problems: repealing the Triborough Amendment. Read More

Legislature rejects union arbitration cap

Governor Cuomo’s proposal to cap arbitration awards for police and firefighters is not included in the Senate or Assembly budget bills. This may be blessing in disguise: as argued here, Cuomo’s original proposal didn’t go nearly far enough. Since the arbitration law expires on June 30, the governor remains in a commanding position to demand more. Read More

Labor costs rose faster in public sector in ‘09

Employee compensation in the state and local government sector increased at twice the private-sector rate during the 12 months ending in December, according to national data released todayby the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. Read More

Getting Triborough wrong

“Mandate relief remains elusive,” is one of the state-related headlines in today’s Albany Times Union — and that much, at least, is true. Unfortunately, the articlebeneath the headline repeats a familiar canard about the origins of the Triborough Amendment. Read More

Persuading co-workers to retire

Oneida County employees participating in a proposed cash buyout program would have a strong incentive to get their co-workers to join them: their payments will increase if more employees participate. Read More

Examining MDs

Should physicians, who are licensed by the state of New York, be required to take a civil service exam in order to work for the state of New York? A state judge thinks so, but that's unlikely to be the last word on the controversy. Read More

Teaching without contracts

As schools open, the number of school districts at impasse with teacher unions has increased by 12 percent since a year ago, according to the Public Employment Relations Board. Also noteworthy--although not emphasized by PERB--nearly one out of three school districts has yet to negotiate a new contract with its teachers. Read More

Car 54, where are you?

New York City will track the whereabouts of its 379 building inspectors with GPS technology installed, not in their city-issued vehicles, but in their cell phones. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!