New Jersey imposed a 4 percent cap on local property tax increases a year before Governor David Paterson endorsed the Suozzi Commission’s call for a school property tax cap in New York.  But unlike Paterson’s original proposal, the cap signed into law by New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine in 2007 contained a number of loopholes, including a clause exempting the cost of health insurance benefits.  Municipalities were also allowed to seek a cap waiver from the New Jersey Local Finance Board.

The result: “Nearly a third of the state’s 566 municipalities raised property taxes above the cap with the state’s permission last year,” the Newark Star-Ledger reports.   The newspaper says municipalities “were able to show they were facing virtual civic dysfunction” if taxes were capped.

Through hundreds of pages of applications asking to exceed the cap, school and town officials spared no adjectives when describing what would happen without relief: The police force would be cut. Special education aides would be fired. Fire hydrants would not be installed.

“Impossible” one town said of the budget it would produce under the cap. “Catastrophic” disruptions to basic services, warns another.

Still others envisioned Armageddon scenarios:

Carlstadt, where property taxes rose 10 percent, claimed it would “have no alternative but to shut down all operations in the borough.” Lake Como, where taxes jumped nearly 9 percent, said denying a waiver to spend more “would jeopardize the public health and safety.”

Unfortunately, the Star Ledger failed to scrutinize these claims more closely.  If New Jersey is anything like New York—and in many key respects, it is—most of the cost pressure on municipalities came from collectively bargained pay hikes.   If the cap had been tighter, municipalities and school districts would have been forced to confront these costs more directly.  But even at that, more than two-thirds were able to live within the cap.

Lesson for cap proponents in New York: do not under any circumstances allow a limit on local taxes to be riddled with loopholes (as Paterson himself proposed last year).  Imitate Proposition 2 1/2 in Massachusetts: allow absolutely no exceptions to a property tax cap, but give local voters to override or “underride” as they see fit, as further explained in a 2008 Empire Center White Paper.

Meanwhile, it sounds as if New Jersey may not be finished tinkering with is local tax limit.  The Star-Ledger article concludes with a quote from one of the Garden State’s legislative leaders.

Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) said the caps have helped cut average annual increases from the 7 percent range. But while “there has to be a little bit of flexibility” for dire circumstances, he said, the waivers are ripe for a “second look.”

“When we started this, people said they couldn’t live with it, and they’re living with it and they’re making it work,” Sweeney said. “It really comes down to, ‘Yes, we know you want lower taxes, but lower taxes can’t come with the amount of government that we have.’”

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Report Reveals Albany’s Balanced Budget a Gimmick

Extending the budget window reveals large, yawning budget gaps growing from nearly $8 billion in 2026 to nearly $20 billion by the end of the decade. Read More

Voters Approve Nearly All School Budgets Within Tax Cap

School budget votes proposing an average increase in per pupil spending of 4.2 percent were overwhelmingly approved in state-wide voting held yesterday. Read More

School budgets sail under cap

Yesterday’s school budget votes proved once again New York’s school districts aren’t having much difficulty staying under—or overriding—the property tax cap. Read More

One-house megabucks

With the clock ticking toward the April 1 start of the next state fiscal year, Assembly Democrats just laid out their budget preferences—and, as usual, they add up to a massive tax-and-spend fantasy. Read More

Tax cap fibs test limits

Government unions aren’t letting the facts get in the way of their opposition to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s push for a permanent property tax cap. Testifying in Albany this month on Cuomo’s FY20 Executive Budget, union leaders made a number of misrepresentations regarding the cap, which since 2011 has slowed the growth of property taxes outside New York City. Read More

Cuomo holding strong on tax cap

Governor Andrew Cuomo on Friday laid down an important marker in his push to make the property tax cap permanent, rejecting changes that would weaken it. Read More

Assembly GOP wants higher taxes

Assembly Republicans, who ought to know better, have issued a proposal that would weaken the state’s property tax cap. Read More

Tax cap keeps getting grief

Seven years after its enactment, Governor Andrew Cuomo’s cap on property tax levies continues to be a target of unfounded criticism by some politicians and candidates who either don’t understand the cap or deliberately misrepresent how it works. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!