cash-pile-notes-1792301New York would pay a price for running a high-cost Medicaid program if the Senate GOP health plan becomes law.

A little-discussed provision of the Senate’s Better Care Reconciliation Act would dock a portion federal funding from states that spend the most per Medicaid enrollee, while boosting aid to the lowest-spending states.

Based on current funding levels, this “equity” adjustment could cost New York between $325 million and $1.3 billion a year in federal aid starting in 2020.

Also vulnerable to losing money from the provision are Rhode Island, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, New Hampshire, the District of Columbia, and Massachusetts (see chart).


Low-spending states likely to receive a boost in federal aid would include Alabama and Illinois.

(This listing is based on per-enrollee Medicaid spending amounts from National Health Expenditure data from the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services. The Kaiser Family Foundation has calculated different per-enrollee figures, but New York still lands in the high-spending category.)

The proposed rule would attempt to address a long-standing inequity in the Medicaid financing system: Because the federal government reimburses a fixed percentage of each state’s costs, states that spend the most also draw the most federal aid.

New York, as a high-wealth state, receives the lowest possible matching rate of 50 percent. Yet because it spends so much of its own money on the program, it receives more federal matching aid per capita than poor states such as Mississippi, with the maximum matching rate of 75 percent.

Like the House bill, BRCA would for the first time cap how much aid states can draw – based on current levels of per-enrollee spending, trended forward by inflation. On top of that cap, the Senate bill would further restrict aid to states with per-enrollee spending that exceeds 25 percent of the national average – a category that includes New York. The rule would reduce the cap on aid to these states by between 0.5 and 2 percent, depending on the discretion of the secretary of Health and Human Services.

States with per-enrollee spending more than 25 percent below the national average would see their caps lifted by 0.5 to 2 percent.

High-cost states such as Alaska, North Dakota, and Montana, would be exempted from this rule on grounds that low population density tends to drive high per-person healthcare spending.

The equity rule would come on top of other cuts New York is facing under both BCRA and the House’s American Health Care Act.

Both the House and Senate bills would phase out the extra aid to state under the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion, which would ultimately cost New York about $4 billion. They would compel Albany to absorb $2.3 billion in Medicaid costs that are currently shifted to counties other than New York City. And they would also substantially reduce funding for the $4 billion Essential Plan, an optional benefit under the ACA that only New York and Minnesota exercised.


About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

State Offers Taxpayer-Funded Health Coverage to Unionized Home Care Workers

In a new subsidy for the health-care union 1199 SEIU, the Hochul administration is allowing the union's benefit fund for home care aides to shift some members into taxpayer-funded health coverage through the Essential Plan. Read More

A Closer Look at $4 Billion in State Capital Grants to Health Providers

The state has awarded $4.3 billion in health-care capital grants over the past decade, with a disproportionate share flowing to upstate providers, Health Department records show. Th Read More

Lawmakers Seek To Revive a $10 Fee for Prescriptions That Was Dropped by DFS

A plan to require a $10.18 "dispensing fee" for filling drug prescriptions is back on the table in Albany – this time in the form of legislation rather than regulation. The Read More

How a Medicaid ‘Cut’ Could Lead to More Unionization of Home Care Aides

A money-saving maneuver in the newly enacted Medicaid budget could end up increasing costs in the long term – by paving the way for more unionization of the state's burgeoning home health workforce. Read More

Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending

The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget. Read More

Albany’s New Health Insurance Tax Comes with Few Limits

The newly enacted state budget imposes a multibillion-dollar tax on health insurance without specifying who must pay how much – leaving those basic details to be decided later by the health commissioner in negotiation wit Read More

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More