pasted-image-at-2017_03_09-02_58-pm-300x275-5673200Here’s another major policy conflict between the House Republicans’ Obamacare replacement plan and New York State’s unusually draconian insurance laws.

The GOP’s American Health Care Act includes age-based premium tax credits, ranging from $2,000 for people under 30 to $4,000 for people over 60 – reflecting the fact, in most states, that older people must pay much more for health coverage.

But New York is one of only two states, along with Vermont, that bans insurance companies from charging different premiums based on age. In effect, this rule compels younger insurance customers to pay more so that older customers can pay less.

The tax credits in AHCA, if they become law, would compound the inequity – giving less support to the younger consumers who are already overpaying, and a larger break to older consumers who are underpaying.

The Affordable Care Act allowed insurance companies to charge their oldest customers as much as three times more than their youngest, reflecting the fact that medical expenses rise steeply with age. AHCA would loosen that rule, allowing a five-to-one ratio. Under current law, however, New York and Vermont have strict “community rating,” meaning that insurers must charge the same premium to all customers buying a particular plan, regardless of age or health status.

When combined with AHCA’s age-based tax credits, the result is a lopsided generation gap: For a typical insurance policy costing $5,000 a year, a 20-something would have to pay $3,000 of the premium, while a 60-something would pay only $1,000.

If AHCA becomes law – which is far from certain – New York would face a choice between changing its rules or living with the perverse consequences.

The ban on age-rating of health insurance dates back to a law signed by Governor Mario Cuomo in 1992. That law mandated both “community rating” and “guaranteed issue,” which prohibits insurers from denying customers based on pre-existing health conditions. In the absence of a mandate to buy insurance – or subsidies to lower the premiums – that 1992 law triggered a “death spiral.”

It meant higher premiums for healthier customers, some of whom dropped their coverage as a result. Left with a pool of sicker customers, insurers raised premiums further, leading more customers to leave, and so on. Premiums spiraled and the customer base plummeted.

In other states, the potential generational inequity runs in the opposite direction. A 25-year-old might pay $2,500 for a policy that costs $7,500 for a 62-year-old. After the AHCA tax credits, the 25-year-old would pay just $500, while the 62-year-old would pay $3,500.

The tax credits that currently apply under Obamacare are income-based. They are most generous to people with annual incomes just above the federal poverty line, or $12,060 for an individual, and taper down to nothing at 400 percent of poverty, or $48,240.

The proposed age-based tax credits would be flat for all incomes up to $75,000 for an individual, above which they would phase out.

As previously reported, the House GOP plan also conflicts with New York’s policies on abortion: AHCA would bar using premium tax credits to buy insurance that covers abortion, while New York says state-regulated health plans must cover abortion.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

Lawmakers Seek To Revive a $10 Fee for Prescriptions That Was Dropped by DFS

A plan to require a $10.18 "dispensing fee" for filling drug prescriptions is back on the table in Albany – this time in the form of legislation rather than regulation. The Read More

How a Medicaid ‘Cut’ Could Lead to More Unionization of Home Care Aides

A money-saving maneuver in the newly enacted Medicaid budget could end up increasing costs in the long term – by paving the way for more unionization of the state's burgeoning home health workforce. Read More

Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending

The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget. Read More

Albany’s New Health Insurance Tax Comes with Few Limits

The newly enacted state budget imposes a multibillion-dollar tax on health insurance without specifying who must pay how much – leaving those basic details to be decided later by the health commissioner in negotiation wit Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

Loss of Patients and Revenue Foreshadowed Downsizing for SUNY Downstate

The SUNY-owned hospital in Brooklyn facing a newly announced downsizing plan has seen its patient volume and revenue plunge over the past decade, according to a review of its financial reports. Read More

How a Medicaid Program To Improve Nursing Home Care Ended Up Paying for Union Benefits

New York State's budget-making process sometimes works like a closed loop, as interest groups on the receiving end of state spending reinvest a portion of their proceeds to lobby Albany for still more money. Read More