City workers who qualify for pensions are also eligible for lifetime health insurance coverage — a retirement benefit that has almost disappeared in the private sector. The estimated value of retiree health benefits promised to current and future city government pensioners is now roughly $90 billion, tipping the city’s overall financial balance sheet well into the red.

Like pensions, retiree health benefits are a form of deferred compensation — earned now and paid later. Yet unlike pensions, retiree health benefits are not prefunded by employer and employee contributions to pooled investment trust funds.

The bill is treated as an annual pay-as-you-go expense, meaning it’s shifted from past to present and (mainly) future taxpayers.

The annual cost of health insurance premiums for former city workers has doubled in the past decade and now exceeds $2 billion, roughly equalling what the city has deposited into a trust fund that is supposed to cover the expense.

While the vast majority of city pols have been content to ignore this huge unfunded liability, Councilman Daniel Garodnick deserves a lot of credit for at least calling attention to it. Unfortunately, the remedy he proposed last week would represent little more than a symbolic nod in the general direction of fiscal responsibility.

Garodnick said he’ll propose a City Charter amendment that would require the city to put at least 5% of its annual retiree health insurance expense into the reserve fund. That would currently come to $105 million — which, Garodnick himself admitted, would amount to “spit in a bucket” but could grow over time.

He’d also allow the city to tap the reserve fund to prevent layoffs or service cuts “in times of city budgetary shortfalls” — which, experience suggests, can be expected to happen at least once a decade.

At this rate, the city would never catch up. Under current government accounting rules, reducing the unfunded liability with a truly “irrevocable” trust fund would cost billions of dollars a year that the city does not have. After all, the rising costs of pension fund contributions — up $7 billion since 2000 — already have been crowding out essential services.

There is a better way to strike a balance between preserving health coverage for municipal retirees while ultimately lifting an enormous burden off future generations of New Yorkers.

First, the city needs to restructure the benefits so future retirees pay at least half the premium, as is done in other major cities such as Chicago.

Second, instead of siphoning money into a city-controlled reserve fund that inevitably will be raided to balance the budget, New York should form a retiree medical trust, or RMT, run by and for employees.

An RMT would be similar to the voluntary employee beneficiary associations set up to provide retiree benefits to unionized autoworkers workers in the private sector. The public-sector variant has been increasingly popular in California, Oregon and Washington State, especially among police and firefighters.

For the city, it would offer predictable, affordable funding that eliminates long-term liabilities.

For employees, such trust funds are a way to preserve benefits that will otherwise be threatened by future fiscal stress.

Each RMT would be controlled and administered by its own board of trustees, which could be chosen solely by employees or their unions. Legally and financially speaking, the trust would be a separate entity from both the city and the unions.

The city and active employees would negotiate fixed-dollar contributions on behalf of active workers to the RMT, which would deposit the money in investment pools managed by advisers chosen by the trustees. Like a traditional pension fund, the trust would ensure regular benefit payments.

A truly innovative retiree health-care reform for city government will require courage and creativity. Now that Garodnick has broken the ice on this subject, will anyone skate on it?

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

NYC’s finances look flush — but Eric Adams’ budget carries many real risks

A few months into its third fiscal year since the pandemic’s start, New York City’s finances have never looked so flush — and so precarious. Read More

Defuse this city pension bomb

Wednesday, Mayor de Blasio presented a fiscal 2018 Executive Budget that called for pension contributions totaling $9.6 billion — another all-time high. Yet city pension plans remain significantly underfunded even by lenient government accounting standards, posing a big risk to New York’s fiscal future. Read More

Cuomo’s ‘affordable housing’ fix: neither affordable, nor a fix

For most of the past year and a half, Gov. Cuomo has sought to make the 421-a affordable housing program both less effective and more wasteful, by mandating the use of higher-priced unionized construction workers on 421-a projects. Read More

Long Island’s Coming Fiscal Crash

Budget deficits papered over with borrowed money and fiscal gimmicks. Unaffordable union contracts. Pension contributions “amortized” into the future. Retiree health benefits promised but unfunded. Corruption probes and whiffs of scandal. Accountability blurred, responsibility shirked, and hard decisions avoided again and again. That litany could describe any number of old, declining American cities—including a few that, like Detroit, actually went broke. But the same dysfunction exists in affluent corners of New York’s archetypal suburb: Long Island Read More

NY’s disability pension gambit

New York City’s pension costs will reach nearly $8.8 billion in the coming 2016 fiscal year — more than double the 2006 level and nearly eight times the 2001 amount. Yet now, with a week to go in the state legislative session, Albany is poised to drive those costs even higher. Read More

Gotham nightmare: The day NYC nearly went bottom up

In many respects, New York City looks economically and fiscally as strong as it’s ever been. But it’s still worth recalling that, 40 years ago this week, things were very different. Read More

Sticking New York with unaffordable debt

Skyrocketing public-pension obligations have generated concern across the country, especially in the wake of high-profile bankruptcies of Detroit and Stockton, Calif. In New York, an even larger burden looms in the form of lifetime health-insurance coverage promised to state and local government employees. Yet at least one house of the Legislature is considering a bill that would effectively prevent any effort to reduce this unaffordable debt. Read More

Read the fine print behind the UFT contract deal

Mayor Bill de Blasio's 9-year contract agreement with the United Federation of Teachers, including a pair of 4 percent base-salary increases retroactive to the fall of 2008, will cost so much that he wants to defer some of the expense all the way out to the end of the decade. Read More