Governor Andrew Cuomo’s executive budget proposal pulls the plug on the state’s disappointing START-UP NY program.
Under Public Protection and General Government legislation submitted as part of the budget process, Cuomo proposes rebranding START-UP as the “Excelsior Business Program” (not to be confused with the “Excelsior Jobs Program”). Excelsior would give out similar tax-free benefits but operate under substantially different rules.
Companies that are fewer than five years old would be eligible for the modified program, which allows businesses to operate for at least five years without paying income, sales or property tax. The law now requires that businesses “must not be operating or located within the state” at the time they apply to START-UP.
Cuomo’s proposal swaps out the prohibition on moving jobs from one part of the state to another for a requirement that the company must not have “generated net income,” and also adds a 25-employee limit on companies that apply. Many of the businesses currently admitted to START-UP exceed this limit, but would appear to be grandfathered in.
Instead of having to create jobs within their first year, Excelsior would require businesses to create “at least one net new job” during their first five years of operations (page 161).
The legislation also rolls back the state’s overall reporting requirements for its job creation programs: instead of updating the public on a quarterly basis, Empire State Development, which oversees the programs, will now only have to produce annual reports (page 178).
The Empire Center first revealed in July 2016 that START-UP NY had appeared to peak during 2015, securing roughly the same number of job pledges—about 2,100—as it had the year before. In November, a separate Empire Center analysis determined that 2016 would likely be START-UP’s worst year yet.
This isn’t the first time the Cuomo administration has rebranded a failed economic development program: in 2014, its Innovate NY venture capital program became the target of a federal probe, after one of the participants appeared to steer more than $1 million in public funds meant for start-ups into companies it already owned. The program was soon replaced by an even larger VC program called the New York State Innovation Venture Capital Fund program.
START-UP NY lacked the fundamental elements necessary to spark the upstate revitalization its proponents hoped for when it was created in 2013. But if nothing else, it’s served as a controlled experiment, showing that New York’s hostile business climate extends beyond its tax code, and shows that other measures are necessary to make the state more amenable to private-sector growth.
About the Author
You may also like
The 411 On New York’s 911 Skim
New York for decades has collected, under various names, a special tax on mobile phones. The tax, which today shows up on customer bills as the “public safety communications surcharge,” devolved from being a fee to pay for 911 services to a general revenue source with 911 services as a near second thought. Since 2009, almost half the surcharges paid by customers for public safety communications—more than $1 billion—have been redirected to New York’s general fund. Read More
Immigrant Enrollment in ‘Emergency Medicaid’ Surges to 480,000
One of the biggest drivers of New York's Medicaid enrollment growth over the past decade has been "emergency Medicaid" for undocumented immigrants, newly released state records show.
Read More
Medicaid’s Missing Million
The Health Department has been either unable or unwilling to document the eligibility status of almost one million Medicaid recipients, raising further concern about the possibility of large-scale over-enrollment. Read More
New York’s Medicaid Spiral Is Worse Than Hochul Admitted
Although Governor Hochul said last week that the current trajectory of Medicaid spending is "not sustainable," the upward trend is even steeper than she and her budget director have acknowledged.
Read More
NY’s Road To Electric School Buses Gets Bumpy
New York in 2022 told school districts they’d be barred from purchasing gasoline- or diesel-powered buses after 2027, and instead have to buy electric buses at more than double the upfront cost.
“The purchase of new electric buses will help grow the market,” officials later pledged, “which will in turn help reduce prices.”
Unfortunately for taxpayers, those reductions aren’t materializing—because state officials put the prices, and future increases, on cruise control. Read More
Hochul Shows a Jarring Lack of Direction on Health Care
Financing and regulating health care delivery is one of the biggest responsibilities of state government, yet Governor Hochul had remarkably little to say on that topic in her State of the State speech on Tuesday.
Read More
Hochul’s Pushing Affordability. It Would Cost A Lot.
Governor Hochul is hammering an “affordability” theme in the leadup to Tuesday's 2025 State of the State address. But her campaign, dubbed "Money In Your Pockets," has so far featured little that would reduce the cost of providing, and therefore buying, goods or services in New York.
Instead, the biggest announced and expected elements reflect Albany's waning interest in growing the state economy—and a greater appetite to redistribute what it produces. Read More
Unions Reprogram NYS To Do Less With More
Governor Hochul on Saturday signed an innocuous-sounding bill to “regulate the use of automated decision-making systems and artificial intelligence techniques by state agencies.” But the “Legislative Oversight of Automated Decision-making in Government,” or LOADinG Act, wasn’t about protecting New York from self-aware computers trying to wipe out humanity. Instead, it was an early Christmas present for the state's public employee unions—and a lump of coal for New Yorkers hoping for more efficient state government. Read More