The state-funded share of Medicaid costs will escalate rapidly over the next few years as Albany assumes responsibility for a greater share of county and New York Medicaid costs, according to projections explained in a new report from the Empire Center for Public Policy.

Over 40 percent of the $5.6 billion projected increase in state Medicaid through fiscal year 2009-10 will consist of Medicaid and Family Health Plus costs formerly borne by local taxpayers, said the report’s author, Tarren Bragdon, a health policy analyst for the Empire Center. The steep spending projection assumes enactment of cost-containment provisions in Governor Pataki’s 2006-07 budget proposal. With no change in current law, costs will rise by even more — $8.3 billion during the same period, he said.

“Albany’s chronic Medicaid headache could soon turn into a migraine, unless state lawmakers do much more to rein the program’s costs,” Bragdon said.

“Incremental cost-containment won’t be enough to ensure an affordable future for New York’s Medicaid program,” he said. “States such as Florida and South Carolina have adopted more sweeping reforms that encourage Medicaid recipients to take more responsibility for their own coverage in partnership with private insurers. Recent federal changes encourage such approaches.”

Bragdon also shows that up to 25 counties–including nearly all the major urban upstate counties–may soon want to take advantage of a little-noticed provision in the Medicaid takeover law allowing them to swap their entire Medicaid burden in exchange for giving up a portion of their sales tax receipts to the state.

Bragdon’s findings are presented in the first issue of Health Points, a new research bulletin series from the Empire Center.

Tags:

About the Author

Tim Hoefer

Tim Hoefer is president & CEO of the Empire Center for Public Policy.

Read more by Tim Hoefer

You may also like

New York’s post-pandemic Medicaid binge

As state budget preparations head into their final weeks, a confrontation is brewing over Medicaid, the state-run health plan for the low-income and disabled. Governor Hochul has holding the state’s $36 billion share of Medicaid funding essentially Read More

Sticker Shock: The Impact of a ‘Single-Payer’ Health Plan on New York Taxes

Proponents of “single payer” health care are pushing New Yorkers to take a multi-billion-dollar leap of faith. Read More

Medicaid’s Metamorphosis

A new Empire Center report reveals that the New York Medicaid program now covers more individuals above the poverty line than below it. Read More

Altered State: A checklist for change in New York State

This paper describes seven core objectives and offers specific policy recommendations toward their accomplishment. It’s by no means an exhaustive list, rather a good place to start work towards an Altered State with a growing economy, a more efficient public sector and new opportunities for an engaged and informed citizenry. Read More

‘Like fire through dry grass’

If an impeachment proceeding continues, one likely subject of charges will be the Cuomo administration’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic in nursing homes – about which the impeachment panel has already gathered hundreds of thousands of pages of documents. Based on the public record alone, there is ample evidence of serious wrongdoing. Read More

2020 HINDSIGHT: Rebuilding New York’s Public Health Defenses After the Coronavirus Pandemic

As New York emerges from the worst pandemic in a century, its citizens face a new threat to their lives and economic well-being – the danger that their leaders will fail to learn from a painful experience. Read More

Keep the Change 

As the pandemic subsides and Cuomo’s emergency orders expire, the state should take some of what he has done by fiat and keep the change.  Read More

Busting the cap

The budget crisis in New York’s Medicaid program stems from the failure of a key cost-control measure adopted during Governor Cuomo’s first term. In 2011, Cuomo and the Legislature imposed a “global cap” on state Medicaid spending that was tied to the medical inflation rate. The measure showed signs of working at first, but lost its effectiveness as circumstances changed, loopholes multiplied and compliance faltered. Read More