With only hours to go in the state legislative session, are Senate Republicans angling to drill new loopholes in the state’s property tax cap?
It sure sounds like it, based on Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan’s comments to the news media late this morning.
From a report in Capital Pro (subscription required):
“A lot of our members have advocated for minor changes in the cap. There’s an issue involving [payments in lieu of taxes] … there’s been talk about municipal, and also BOCES,” State Senate Republican leader John Flanagan said Wednesday after a closed-door meeting with Governor Andrew Cuomo. “I can’t represent to you fairly that that is part of any final agreement, because frankly, there isn’t one yet.”
What? Less than a month ago, the Senate passed a bill making the tax cap permanent—with no exceptions or exclusions. Governor Andrew Cuomo also has said he wants a permanent cap with no added loopholes.
Yet now, according to their leader, “a lot” of Senate Republicans are advocating for changes to the cap?
Meanwhile, also this morning, the New York State United Teachers union (NYSUT) and groups representing school districts and local governments—i.e., consumers of property tax revenue—banded together outside the Senate chamber for yet another news conference to let the world know they don’t like the tax cap. They have a list of proposed new cap loopholes, including repeal of the 60 percent “supermajority” requirement for tax cap overrides.
Their arguments all boil down to the same objective: make it easier to raise taxes higher and faster. Otherwise—warning!—we might not be able to raise taxes at all next year!
It would be ironic, to say the least, if Senate Republicans—who have previously positioned themselves as tax cap champions—were to become instruments of its unraveling.
You may also like
Feds Move To Close Medicaid’s ‘MCO Tax’ Loophole, Spelling Trouble for New York
New York's budget has sprung its first major leak just five days after being finalized by Governor Hochul and the Legislature.
On Tuesday, federal officials announced a that would Read More
Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget
The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan:
Top lines
Read More
Unforeseen Consequences
We acknowledge that the impact of these measures will be determined by their scope, implementation timeline, pace, and advancements in technology, infrastructure, and market dynamics.
Read More
Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy
New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More
How Medicaid ‘Expansion’ Changes Could Affect New York
As House Republicans consider cutbacks to federal Medicaid funding, their focus has turned to the so-called expansion population.
Although the details of remain undetermined, the s Read More
How Albany Could Save Millions by Closing a Medicaid Loophole
A glitch in state insurance law is allowing doctors to collect Medicaid fees that are sometimes hundreds of times higher than the program normally pays, costing taxpayers millions of dollars a year.
Read More
After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality
This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck.
When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More
New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumps by Another 10 Percent
New York's home health employment is continuing to soar, growing by 57,000 jobs or 10 percent from 2023 to 2024, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Read More