screen-shot-2016-04-08-at-7-33-16-am-150x150-2626090New York’s Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo are about to shovel nearly a half-billion dollars more into the biggest, murkiest, pork-barrel slush fund Albany (and perhaps any state capital) has ever seen.

The agreed-upon fiscal 2019 Capital Projects appropriations bill, in the process of passing (without a negative Senate vote) on Friday night as part of the rushed new state budget, adds $475 million for the State and Municipal Facilities Program (or SAM, also known as SMFP)—the ultimate election-year pig in a blanket.

The sum includes yet another allocation of $385 million (a numeral of apparently mystical significance to legislators, as noted below) plus $90 million set aside for a seemingly ever-lengthening list of authorized purposes and grantees that now include the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the St. Lawrence Seaway (see pp. 931-933 of the bill).

Pouring annual increments of $385 million into the SMFP trough, first created in fiscal 2014, has become an Albany budget tradition. The new appropriation, including that added $90 million, would bring the total authorized for the program over the past five years to a whopping $2.4 billion, of which roughly $500 million (all of it borrowed) has been spent. (For more background on the program, whose existence was first disclosed by the Empire Center in 2013, see links here, here, and here. For a more extensive critique, see my June 2016 op-ed in the New York Post.)

Also in keeping with tradition, no justification for the latest expansion of the program has been offered by the governor or the legislative leaders. As in previous years, the possibility of expanding the fund has never come up in public hearings, debates or briefings. And as state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli has noted, state budgets have included “little or no detail regarding the process for allocating [SAM] funds, or the purposes for which such funds are to be used,” and “details on expenditures — purposes, recipients and other key factors — remain largely outside the State accounting system.”

The oddly repetitive annual addition of $385 million—as if $200 million wouldn’t be enough, but $500 million would be just too much—is also unexplained. Was someone’s spouse or favorite child born in March 1985?  Is 3-8-5 someone’s weekly Lotto pick? Or has “$385 million” become a quick shift-command key combination on some bill drafting computer?

Purposes for which SAM money can be spent encompass practically anything that qualifies as “capital” (i.e., tangible structures or goods), including stuff purchased in support of the highly elastic category of “economic development projects.” Entities eligible to receive SAM money include the state and its local governments; public school districts; colleges and universities; a wide range of public authorities; public libraries; and water, sewer and fire districts. Last year, the Legislature expanded SAM spending to include “the acquisition by eligible entities of equipment and other capital assets, including vehicles, in support of health, safety, technology, or innovation.”

The SAM money is raised through bond sales by the Dormitory Authority and ultimately controlled by the governor, subject to some tacit agreement with the Senate and Assembly that allows legislators to apply for chunks of money for projects in their districts.

As reflected in the searchable spending database at the Empire Center’s SeeThroughNY.net transparency website, the list of 1,266 projects to which SAM funds had been allocated through 2016 was topped by grants to several of the SUNY Poly subsidiaries that figure prominently in a federal indictment of Poly’s founder and former president, Alain Kaloyeros.

Cuomo also has tapped the SAM for comparative fun money, such as the $5 million handed to CBS for renovation of the Ed Sullivan Theater in Manhattan, where “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” is taped. On the other end of the scale, SAM allocations include numerous legislatively steered $50,00o awards to localities for such essential state purposes as “renovation of the bathrooms and locker rooms at the Oyster Bay Cove Police Department.”

 

You may also like

Sorting Fact from Fiction on the Future of Medicaid

As Washington contemplates cutbacks to federal funding for Medicaid, officials in Albany have reacted in two self-contradictory ways. On one hand, they warn of Read More

The 411 On New York’s 911 Skim

New York for decades has collected, under various names, a special tax on mobile phones. The tax, which today shows up on customer bills as the “public safety communications surcharge,” devolved from being a fee to pay for 911 services to a general revenue source with 911 services as a near second thought. Since 2009, almost half the surcharges paid by customers for public safety communications—more than $1 billion—have been redirected to New York’s general fund. Read More

Immigrant Enrollment in ‘Emergency Medicaid’ Surges to 480,000

One of the biggest drivers of New York's Medicaid enrollment growth over the past decade has been "emergency Medicaid" for undocumented immigrants, newly released state records show. Read More

Medicaid’s Missing Million

The Health Department has been either unable or unwilling to document the eligibility status of almost one million Medicaid recipients, raising further concern about the possibility of large-scale over-enrollment. Read More

New York’s Medicaid Spiral Is Worse Than Hochul Admitted

Although Governor Hochul said last week that the current trajectory of Medicaid spending is "not sustainable," the upward trend is even steeper than she and her budget director have acknowledged. Read More

NY’s Road To Electric School Buses Gets Bumpy

New York in 2022 told school districts they’d be barred from purchasing gasoline- or diesel-powered buses after 2027, and instead have to buy electric buses at more than double the upfront cost. “The purchase of new electric buses will help grow the market,” officials later pledged, “which will in turn help reduce prices.” Unfortunately for taxpayers, those reductions aren’t materializing—because state officials put the prices, and future increases, on cruise control. Read More

Hochul Shows a Jarring Lack of Direction on Health Care

Financing and regulating health care delivery is one of the biggest responsibilities of state government, yet Governor Hochul had remarkably little to say on that topic in her State of the State speech on Tuesday. Read More

Hochul’s Pushing Affordability. It Would Cost A Lot.

Governor Hochul is hammering an “affordability” theme in the leadup to Tuesday's 2025 State of the State address. But her campaign, dubbed "Money In Your Pockets," has so far featured little that would reduce the cost of providing, and therefore buying, goods or services in New York. Instead, the biggest announced and expected elements reflect Albany's waning interest in growing the state economy—and a greater appetite to redistribute what it produces. Read More