Mayor Bloomberg’s latest ed-reform plan has gotten much attention.

To get the teachers’ union to support merit pay, Bloomberg proposes to give teachers a salary hike of $20,000 if they prove “highly effective” for two years in a row under a new teacher-evaluation scheme.

As the mayor put it, “we’ll … work to retain the best teachers — by offering them a big raise.”

As the mayor notes, this would be a huge jump — 26 percent above the $78,000 a teacher makes after a decade on the job. And teacher salaries are already up 43 percent under the decade-old Bloomberg administration.

And this boost would be permanent. “Salary” means it’s not a one-time bonus. Even if they’re not “highly effective” later, they would keep getting this money, forever.

This carrot is one meant for the teachers — but taxpayers could end up paying a lot for it.

The city would determine who is “highly effective” through a ratings system based on “measurable improvement in student performance and principal assessment.”

But the kinks are hardly out of the systems we already use to evaluate student performance. Creating a good system to figure out how much teachers add to student performance, and to rate them, is difficult and unproven.

It’s easy to envision a system that rates all teachers as highly effective, or one that is inconsistent, allowing all teachers to reach the high-water mark for at least the two years they need to score their higher salaries.

After all, the city rates restaurants, and the grades outside the windows often change.

Moreover, it’s hard to see the teachers’ union agreeing to a system that didn’t offer all teachers a good shot at the top score.

And the union has the upper hand, as Bloomberg lost on his signature effort last year — changing “last in, first out” rules for layoffs — and wants a victory now.

In any case, it wouldn’t look good for the city if most of its teachers weren’t “highly effective.”

Think of the numbers here. New York has 88,721 teachers. Say half of them were rated “highly effective” — a very conservative guess. Awarding half of teachers a permanent $20,000 raise would cost $887 million.

That’s nearly a billion dollars in extra spending, every single year. Plus, eventually, teachers retire, and they would get higher pensions based on those higher salaries.

Speaking of pensions, it’s not clear how the new approach to teachers squares with last year’s promise:

I will not sign a contract [with a municipal union] with salary increases unless they are accompanied by reforms in benefit packages that produce the savings we need to continue making investments in our future and protecting vital services, period.

The mayor has kept that pledge, and should continue to do so.

But it’s hard to see the teachers’ union agreeing to a salary hike that requires them to take (or appear to take) a risk, and then give much of it right back in the form of benefits reform.

You may also like

New York’s K-12 Problem

New York has an education problem that no one really likes to talk about: it spends more than any other state or country in the world yet achieves mediocre results at best. This might come as a surprise, especially since some politicians and pundits tout Read More

Two Dozen School Districts Are Returning to the Polls for Budget Revotes

Voters in 24 New York school districts return to the polls on Tuesday for school budget revotes. Last month, voters in 96 percent of school districts outside New York City conducting votes approved their school budgets for the upcoming year. The 683 sc Read More

Empire Center Launches K-12 SOS on Education Achievement and Spending in New York

In 2022-23 New York used to spend more than any other state or country – $30,000 per student. Next school year the spending might increase to $35,000 per student. Even at $30,000 New York spends twice as much as the US average, and about a third more Read More

Don’t Tell The Grownups: NY Still Hiding State Test Scores

State education officials are refusing to release the results of federally required assessments in grades 3 through 8, deliberately keeping parents and taxpayers in the dark—not only about how New York’s public schools performed, but also about how that performance was measured. Read More

What You Should Know: NY’s changing graduation requirements

Months after lowering the scores to pass state assessment exams, New York education officials are considering eliminating the Regents diploma. Read More

State Drags Out Test Mess

The New York State Education Department (SED) was proud to announce this week that they have lifted the embargo on last year’s state test scores in reading and math. Does this mean the public gets to see them now?  Read More

Back to School: New York Style

Class is in session across the state, and things are messy (especially in New York City).  Read More

Where are New York’s Test Results?

For the second year in a row, New York parents will receive their back-to-school shopping lists before their students' results on state assessments. and Read More