New York’s “cap and invest” program (NYCI), a central part of the state’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, appears designed to hold back much of the program’s sticker-shock until January 2027—after the 2026 election.
About two-thirds of emissions would be subject to NYCI (pronounced “nicky”), meaning the companies responsible would need to purchase allowances from the state. Allowances would be required for most fuel purchases (federal law exempts aviation fuel), and officials are still deciding among other things whether the rules would apply to electric generators, who already pay into a separate system.
Source: NYSERDA
The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) would determine how many allowances each company needs, establish a limit on the number of allowances sold in a year and place a ceiling on the price of those allowances. As the state approaches its 2030 emissions reduction goal (about 34 percent below 2021 levels), the number of allowances would shrink and the ceiling would rise.
Last week officials from NYSERDA, the state energy agency, presented a preliminary analysis showing how the program could look when it’s launched next year. While they emphasized the price levels were hypothetical, all three scenarios (see below) called for the price ceiling to more than double at the beginning of 2027. By comparison, price ceilings increase 5 to 6 percent in each of the other years.
Put another way:
Under the “modeling exercise,” NYCI would add at least 13 to 21 cents to the cost of a gallon of gasoline in 2026—and 22 to 48 cents in 2027. The total cost in 2025 (in the hypothetical scenarios, in 2022 dollars) would range from $3.1 billion to $5 billion, rising to $5.6 billion to $11.9 billion in 2030. At least 30 percent of NYCI proceeds would be rebated back to at least some New Yorkers (possibly as a refundable tax credit). NYSERDA has indicated a significant portion of households will break even or come out ahead.
These are preliminary numbers, but the fact that the 2026-2027 jump was the basis for all three scenarios is a strong indicator this will be a feature of the program when it’s rolled out later this year.
This wouldn’t be the first time New York climate policy was molded with Election Day in mind.
As the Climate Act was being finalized in June 2019, a costly provision—requiring the state to get 38 percent of its electricity from renewables by 2022—was dropped. To put that in perspective, New York only reached 30 percent renewables in 2022 (a target previously set for 2015), and forcing utilities to pay subsidies equivalent to 8 percent of load would have pushed electricity rates considerably higher in 2022 when Governor Andrew Cuomo expected to be seeking a fourth term.
Meanwhile, the announcement of detailed regulations (such as bans on gas stoves and oil furnaces) was moved from June 2022 in the original version to December 2022 in the final text, putting it weeks after the 2022 gubernatorial election.
It’s difficult to square the apocalyptic rhetoric from state officials about the threat posed by climate change with New York again moving climate-policy timelines to mitigate electoral blowback. As a political move, however, given that the state is deliberately aiming to make things cost too much for people to keep using them, doing it after an election makes perfect sense.
About the Author
You may also like
After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality
This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck.
When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More
New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumps by Another 10 Percent
New York's home health employment is continuing to soar, growing by 57,000 jobs or 10 percent from 2023 to 2024, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Read More
Hochul Pushes New Energy Tax Past Next Election
Governor Hochul has further delayed what amounts to a tax on energy until after the next general election.
Almost six years after the state adopted an aggressive emissions-cutting Read More
Sorting Fact from Fiction on the Future of Medicaid
As Washington contemplates cutbacks to federal funding for Medicaid, officials in Albany have reacted in two self-contradictory ways.
On one hand, they warn of Read More
The 411 On New York’s 911 Skim
New York for decades has collected, under various names, a special tax on mobile phones. The tax, which today shows up on customer bills as the “public safety communications surcharge,” devolved from being a fee to pay for 911 services to a general revenue source with 911 services as a near second thought. Since 2009, almost half the surcharges paid by customers for public safety communications—more than $1 billion—have been redirected to New York’s general fund. Read More
Immigrant Enrollment in ‘Emergency Medicaid’ Surges to 480,000
One of the biggest drivers of New York's Medicaid enrollment growth over the past decade has been "emergency Medicaid" for undocumented immigrants, newly released state records show.
Read More
Medicaid’s Missing Million
The Health Department has been either unable or unwilling to document the eligibility status of almost one million Medicaid recipients, raising further concern about the possibility of large-scale over-enrollment. Read More
New York’s Medicaid Spiral Is Worse Than Hochul Admitted
Although Governor Hochul said last week that the current trajectory of Medicaid spending is "not sustainable," the upward trend is even steeper than she and her budget director have acknowledged.
Read More