Last week’s surprise resignation of the state education commissioner, MaryEllen Elia, leaves New York schools at a crossroads. Depending on whom the Board of Regents selects to succeed Elia, the commissioner can serve as a force for reform or for preserving a troubled status quo.

The next commissioner will shape crucial policies on curriculum, testing and accountability, graduation requirements and the relationship between government and private schools.

New York’s education commissioner is the highest-ranking state-government official not directly answerable to or appointed by the governor. ­Under a system dating back to the immediate post-colonial era, it’s up to the 17-member Board of Regents to hire the commissioner.

Working with the Regents, the commissioner has broad regulatory oversight of New York’s more than 700 school districts and the boards that govern them, as well as licensure of teachers and other professionals.

Elia, a former superintendent, spent most of her four years as commissioner treading water. She generally maintained all that is best and worst about New York’s $70 billion school system.

One Elia misstep was issuing regulations that could allow unprecedented intrusion by local school officials into the affairs of nearly all private and parochial schools — overreach that goes far beyond improving admittedly lackluster academic curricula at some yeshivas.

A more important issue is graduation rates. Since she submitted her resignation, the Board of Regents is reportedly considering scrapping Regents’ exams in order to artificially boost graduation rates, and that’s where her successor should focus his or her energies.

For starters, the next commissioner should acknowledge how recent improvements in graduation rates don’t mean that growing percentages of students are actually college- or career-ready.

For example, the improvement in statewide graduation rates of 9.5 points over 10 years, to 80 percent, doesn’t correlate with actual readiness for college or career, which has hovered more than 40 percentage points lower.

Yes, Elia’s successor should guide a rethinking of graduation requirements that have become overly skewed to four-year college preparation at a time when lucrative skilled blue-collar jobs are going unfilled. Such rethinking, however, shouldn’t come at the expense of watering down standards for students heading to college.

Rather, the goal should be college and career readiness — period — and the state should retain Regents exam requirements as at least one pathway for students.

It’s also crucial for the next education commissioner to tackle the state’s controversial Common Core curriculum and the integrity of the standardized testing system, whose validity has been undermined by aggressive grade-curving and a boycott movement that has led large numbers of students to opt out of testing, especially on Long Island.

The next education commissioner also should be more willing to tackle the spiraling cost of public education in New York — which, at more than $23,000 per pupil, or 89 percent above the 50-state average, leads the country. Pushing back against the Regents’ tendency to demand more than the state can afford, the commissioner should present legislative and regulatory options to spend more effectively and save money for taxpayers.

Last but not least, the commissioner must be a voice for disadvantaged, low-income children who are all too often consigned to failing, substandard public schools. Charter schools and private K-12 scholarships have proved to be highly effective ways to provide true equality of opportunity — and quality education — to kids otherwise poorly served by the school districts in which they live.

Expanding and protecting school choice while improving traditional public education aren’t mutually exclusive priorities: The next commissioner should embrace both.

To be successful, the commissioner should have a proven track record of experience and accomplishment as an educator, manager and skillful navigator of diverse and competing interests. It’s a tall order, to be sure.

Albany’s legion of teacher unions, school-professional associations, special-interest advocates and the politicians they incessantly lobby remain focused primarily on the interests of adults employed by the education system. It sounds trite, but it’s true: The next education commissioner must rise above the noise and put children first.

© 2019 New York Post

About the Author

Peter Murphy

Peter Murphy handles Government Affairs at the Empire Center.

Read more by Peter Murphy

You may also like

Under Assault: New York’s Private and Parochial Schools

Will the Regents and education bureaucrats succeed in forcing nonpublic schools to conform to unprecedented state control? Read More

Northport’s cash cow is Long Island’s burden

Among New York school districts with enrollments of 4,000 or more, the list of highest property taxes per pupil is what you’d expect — topped by Great Neck, Scarsdale, Syosset and Bedford. In fifth place is a somewhat less wealthy outlier: the Northport-East Northport district. It will raise $28,556 per pupil in property taxes next year, based on data from the state’s 2018-19 Property Tax Report Card. That’s 57 percent above the Suffolk County average. Read More

New York’s public schools vastly outspend the nation

The courtroom war over New York’s school funding is far from over. Read More

New York’s school-bond boondoggle

On Election Day, New York voters will be asked to let the state borrow up to $2 billion to help public schools buy computer hardware they don’t urgently need and create space for pre-kindergarten programs that most districts outside New York City can’t afford. Read More

Read the fine print behind the UFT contract deal

Mayor Bill de Blasio's 9-year contract agreement with the United Federation of Teachers, including a pair of 4 percent base-salary increases retroactive to the fall of 2008, will cost so much that he wants to defer some of the expense all the way out to the end of the decade. Read More

Soaking the rich is a shaky strategy

High-income New Yorkers are probably the least stable, consistent and reliable segment of the city's income tax base. According to state tax data, there were 49,000 city households with adjusted gross income of more than $500,000 as of 2007. They earned $135 billion that year. Read More

NY casino measure: A sucker’s bet

A large majority of New York City residents think the non-Indian gambling casinos authorized by Proposal One on next week’s statewide ballot will bring in “significant new revenue for New York state and local governments,” according to a New York Times-Siena poll released Tuesday. Read More

A ‘Ladder’ to Sky-High School Taxes

The New York State Board of Regents this month celebrated the season of giving by calling on Gov. Pataki and the Legislature to giftwrap another $1.45 billion in state aid to public schools next year -- an 11 percent hike on top of this year's record $1.16 billion increase, which brought total school aid to $13.6 billion. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.