It’s increasingly apparent that New York is suffering more severely from the coronavirus pandemic than any other part of the U.S. and most of the rest of the world – raising stark questions for city and state leaders.

What is it about New York, and especially New York City, that made it especially vulnerable to infection and death? And how can that be changed before the next virus breaks loose?

The answers aren’t necessarily as obvious as they seem. 


This is an installment in a special series of #NYCoronavirus chronicles by Empire Center analysts, focused on New York’s state and local policy response to the Coronavirus pandemic.


On Tuesday, city officials expanded their tally of Covid-19 victims to include 3,778 fatalities in which the diagnosis was not confirmed by testing. That boosted the city’s toll to 10,367 as of April 13, one month after the state’s first recorded death – and hundreds more are succumbing every day.

Even before that adjustment, New York’s body count stood out on a national and global scale. Through Monday, the state Health Department had tallied more than 11,000 deaths, overwhelmingly concentrated in the city’s five boroughs and the surrounding metropolitan region. That accounts for almost half of the U.S. total and exceeds the national toll in all but five countries.

After adjusting for population, New York is still an outlier (see charts below). The state’s rate of deaths per million residents, at 554 through April 13, is seven times the nationwide rate and 42 percent higher than that of any large country. The neighboring states of New Jersey and Connecticut rank second and fourth in the U.S., likely because so many of their residents commute into New York for work.

During the first week of April, New York’s toll from Covid-19 alone was about one-third higher than its usual weekly number of deaths from all causes.

So how did New York become the capital of coronavirus?

The list of commonly cited explanations starts with population density. The city’s packed subways and generally crowded environment make it all too easy for contagions to spread from person to person.

Yet only a handful of urban areas worldwide, such as Madrid and the Lombardy region of Italy, have seen outbreaks as deadly as New York’s. Seoul has recorded fewer than 1,000 deaths, as have Chicago and Philadelphia. Tokyo and Singapore have reported fewer than 100 fatalities each, and Hong Kong less than 10.

Another much-discussed factor is political decision-making. Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio have faced criticism for waiting too long to take precautions such as banning large gatherings, closing schools and non-essential businesses, and directing residents to stay home as much as possible.

California Governor Gavin Newsom issued a stay-at-home order on March 19, when his state had recorded just over 1,000 confirmed cases and 19 deaths. When Cuomo followed suit the next day, New York had confirmed more than 4,000 cases and 30 deaths.

However, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis did not issue his stay-at-home order until April 1, by which time his state had more than 7,000 cases and 100 deaths – and to date Florida’s infection and mortality rates remain a fraction of New York’s.

It’s possible as the pandemic continues that other parts of the country and world will experience similarly severe infection and death rates. For now, though, New York’s outcome is unusually bad – and neither density nor decision-making seem to fully explain why. 

This raises the question of what else went wrong. Is there something different about New York’s infrastructure, its health-care system or its public policy? Could it be related to the nature of its economy, demographics, or culture?

Or is the strain of virus afflicting this part of the country – which apparently arrived via Europe – particularly infectious or lethal?

“If we don’t learn the lessons from this situation, then all of this will have been in vain,” Governor Cuomo said at Wednesday’s daily briefing.

Once the immediate crisis is past, getting to the bottom of this mystery should be a top priority. The answers will be important not just for New York, but for all states and countries that want to be better prepared for the next outbreak.

 

dpm-u-s-4-13-1712428
Sources: New York State Health Department, New York Times state-by-state data (click to enlarge)

 

dpm-nys-4-13-8970581
Source: New York State Health Department (click to enlarge)
dpm-country-4-13-1-5463285
Source: New York State Department of Health, Worldometer (click to enlarge)

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

Even With Federal Cuts, New York’s Health Funding Would Remain High

New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding under the major budget bill being debated in Washington – a rare and jarring turn of events for a sector accustomed to steadily increas Read More

As Albany’s Session Ends, Watch for Rising Health Costs

Every session of the state Legislature brings a fresh crop of proposals that would drive up health-care costs, and 2025 is no exception. Here is a sampling of pending bills that, if Read More

House Budget Would Burst New York’s Essential Plan Bubble

The extraordinary cash bonanza associated with New York's Essential Plan – which has generated billions more than state officials were able to spend – would come to a crashing end under the budget bill advancing in Cong Read More

The House GOP’s Shrinking Budget Plan Could Still Cost New York Billions

The likely impact of federal health-care cutbacks has diminished in recent days as House Republican leaders backed away from some of their bigger-ticket proposals, reducing the estimated savings to $625 billion from previous figures of $715 billion and $8 Read More

How Medicaid ‘Expansion’ Changes Could Affect New York

As House Republicans consider cutbacks to federal Medicaid funding, their focus has turned to the so-called expansion population. Although the details of remain undetermined, the s Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumps by Another 10 Percent

New York's home health employment is continuing to soar, growing by 57,000 jobs or 10 percent from 2023 to 2024, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Read More

Immigrant Enrollment in ‘Emergency Medicaid’ Surges to 480,000

One of the biggest drivers of New York's Medicaid enrollment growth over the past decade has been "emergency Medicaid" for undocumented immigrants, newly released state records show. Read More

Upstate Insurance Customers Pay the Price for Medicare’s Hospital Rate Hike

A billion-dollar Medicare windfall for upstate hospitals has turned into a crisis for upstate health insurers that's threatening to disrupt coverage for millions of New Yorkers. The Read More