Yesterday, another New York art auction went poorly, with a Christie’s sale bringing in $146.7 million against a “low” estimate of $240.7 million. “Of the 82 works for sale, 36, or more than 40 percent, of the auction went unsold,” the Times reports. The sale, the third poor performance of the week, bodes poorly for New York City’s high-end real-estate market.
Why? Just consider what the Times magazine had to say about a new apartment building in Brooklyn in an article that ran a year and a half ago.
[Developer Mario] Procida is marketing it like a little outpost of Manhattan, importing a voguish sales tool from across the river: the idea of packaging apartments as inhabitable art. … The working theory is that in an uncertain economy, at a moment when the real estate market seems to be cooling, it’s smartest to bet on those who worry about money the least, building for the rich and their high-end tastes.
You may also like
Albany Should Listen to Jamie Dimon
Parsing the Impact of Mamdani’s Tax Hike Plans
At mid-year, NY still far below most states in pandemic jobs recovery
New York’s pricey hospitals draw pushback from labor
At end of ’22, NY still near bottom in pandemic recovery
On College Readiness, Comptroller Asks Wrong Question, Delivers Flawed Answer
A Look at Covid Learning Loss in NYC
Judge, Jury and … CFO?
Albany Should Listen to Jamie Dimon
- April 9, 2026
Parsing the Impact of Mamdani’s Tax Hike Plans
- October 30, 2025
New York’s pricey hospitals draw pushback from labor
- February 22, 2023
At end of ’22, NY still near bottom in pandemic recovery
- January 24, 2023
A Look at Covid Learning Loss in NYC
- September 29, 2022
Judge, Jury and … CFO?
- August 4, 2022
