A state court judge at a hearing this morning will consider whether to interfere with New York City authority over its own budget by ordering a preliminary injunction that ices a portion of Gotham’s recently enacted FY 23 city budget. In issuing a temporary restraining order (TRO) last week, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Lyle Frank forestalled $215 million in education spending reductions scheduled to occur under the $101.1 billion budget agreement between Mayor Eric Adams and the City Council, which adopted the measure in a 44-6 vote on June 13 

In lieu of the cuts, the Court decreed that the education funding levels for all city schools this Fall temporarily remain at the levels set under last year’s budget. 

 The reductions in dispute represent less than one percent of the city’s total education spending. They are derived from a formula-driven, enrollment-based calculation. Gotham’s public-school student population has fallen at least eight percent since the pandemic’s onset — and the city projects a further decline this fall. The past few budget cycles, city schools that lost students were spared the reductions the city’s Fair Student Funding formula would otherwise yield. With no enrollment reversal in sight, Mayor Adams put attenuated cuts in his February blueprint and continued advocating for them in the ensuing months. 

The proposed cuts were a paramount issue in the weeks and days preceding the budget vote, with the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), which represents Gotham educators, publicizing specific projections of the funding reductions that would occur at individual city schools. 

Nevertheless, Adams prevailed upon the Council to swallow cuts within a final budget package that spent more overall than his original offer. 

In the aftermath, progressive Council members began to express voter’s remorse. On July 18, in an act of self-flagellation, several members publicly expressed great regret for voting in favor of the budget, due to the education funding cuts.   

Shortly thereafter, Justice Frank’s TRO was handed down, in response to a plea from a small group of plaintiffs petitioning on behalf of parents and teachers.  

The slim legal reed the TRO relies on is a provision within Section 2590(g) of the state Education Law requiring the City’s Panel for Education Policy (PEP), i.e., the city board of education, to adopt the Education Department’s estimated budget before it goes to the City Council. The ministerial nature of the PEP vote is best evidenced by the fact that it is routinely dispensed with; in seven of the past nine prior budget cycles, the PEP failed to approve the education budget in advance of the Council vote. In each instance, the Education Chancellor issued an emergency declaration waiving its necessity. He did so again this year. 

Where were the challenges to the city education budget during all those prior years of PEP noncompliance? There were none, in part because there’s nothing in law attaching any consequences to the PEP’s failure to bless the education proposal.  

For better or worse, few of the numerous budget process procedural requirements written into state law carry any sort of penalty for noncompliance. It’s not surprising then, that they aren’t always followed to the letter.  

That shouldn’t be a pretext for judges to rewrite budgets adopted by elected representatives. 

About the Author

Peter Warren

Peter Warren is the Director of Research at the Empire Center for Public Policy.

Read more by Peter Warren

You may also like

A Look at Covid Learning Loss in NYC

New York City set an example worthy of approbation and emulation by publishing their grade 3-8 test results in math and English language arts. Read More

NY Pandemic Learning Loss Data Under Wraps 

Nationwide test results revealing major pandemic learning loss have been front page news this month. Read More

The Essential Plan’s accumulated surplus balloons to $8 billion, with no fix in sight

The state's Essential Plan has generated billions in surpluses as the program automatically drew pandemic relief money that it did not need Read More

State Budget Back in the Red

Historically large budgetary surpluses inherited by Governor Hochul are now just a memory with New York facing projected gaps of $13.7 Billion Read More

NY’s jobs recovery now strongest downstate

The Empire State's private-sector employment gains over the past year have been increasingly concentrated in New York City. Read More

Mission Creep Could Worsen NY’s Education Woes

American schools are dealing with an unprecedented mental health crisis spurred, at least in part, by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated school closures Read More

Charter Law Fix is Low-Hanging Fruit for Legislature

A floor amendment to lift the charter cap that limits the number of charters granted to operate such schools in New York City was rejected by the State Senate last week. Read More


Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.


Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org


The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!