Of next year’s expected $700 billion federal infrastructure stimulus package, New York state likely will get $4 billion for mass transit, with most of that money going toward city projects, including a second station on the planned extension westward of the #7 train. The media greeted the announcement as good news, but it actually shows why it’s such a bad idea for wealthy cities to depend on federal policies for rational infrastructure planning.

Consider: if New York City had worked with the state since 2003 simply to keep its medical costs — health benefits for public-sector workers as well as for people on Medicaid — in line with inflation, the city would have an extra $5 billion rolling in every two years now to spend on whatever it wants, including subway infrastructure. The city also could have used the money as leverage over the state-run MTA to make sure that the authority used the funds wisely; another set of powerful, independent eyes can never hurt.

Plus, the city could have taken advantage of a particularly brutal economic trough now rather than fall completely prostrate to it.

How? As the local, national and global economies plummet, demand for construction materials, construction-intensive commodities like oil, and labor have fallen as well. New York and the MTA could have taken advantage of those lower costs by getting more projects done now for less money.

Instead, they’ve got to depend on a federal stimulus, the mass scale of which could push the costs of all of those things up again, meaning New York will get less work done per dollar than it would have otherwise.

Costs are going up in another way, too. Four billion dollars barely makes a dent in the MTA’s projected $30 billion long-term capital plan, and it could be much more expensive for the state to borrow for its own contribution to the rest of plan in the years ahead. Perversely, as the federal government borrows heavily to “contribute” money to our stimulus, that federal borrowing pushes our own costs of borrowing up, because it signals to investors to demand a higher return as compensation for the risk of inflation.

To wit: Municipal Market Advisors notes today that in 2009, “the muni market will either need extraordinary support via legislative change or must transition to steadily higher interest rates to restore demand and finance the massive current borrowing needs of state and local issuers.”

Plus, we’ll still be paying for our own federal stimulus money, and more, because New York still sends more money to Washington than it gets back each year, due to the nation’s progressive tax system. In other words, New Yorkers, even with their straitened finances, will be paying not only for our subway station but for sewer lines in Akron.

New York will pay a high price for its budgeting practices of the last decade. The price includes the opportunity cost of less-than-optimal infrastructure in a city that now needs to become more productive, now that one of its most seemingly productive industries, Wall Street, is gone. It also includes a dependence on the federal government’s inefficient allocation of the city’s own resources now to keep our already aging infrastructure from dangerously deteriorating.

The point of this is not to criticize the city for something that it did in the past — albeit the very recent past — that it can’t undo now.

But we should understand the numbers and learn the lesson well to make sure that we don’t make the same mistake this time around, making the structural budget problems that starved the city of world-class infrastructure during the record boom times worse instead of better during the record downturn.

We will make things worse instead of better, for example, if we sit around depending on federal infrastructure dollars and other federal bailout monies — i.e. for Medicaid next year — to avoid making hard choices about the rest of the city’s budget — read, medical costs, plus education — now.

If New York does learn any valuable lesson at all here, though, it will be ahead of the federal government, which seems to think that it can rescue the nation from a borrowing binge through more borrowing.

You may also like

De Blasio’s (Apparent) Good Move Dissolves Into Phony “Savings”

Late Thursday, as hailed in this space, Mayor de Blasio finally made a decisive move—or at least seemed to make a move—in the direction of actually saving some money on labor costs by getting tough with a powerful (and powerfully self-entitled) municipal union. Read More

A grim toll gets worse

The full toll of the coronavirus pandemic in New York is likely thousands higher than the official death tallies, according to newly released federal data. Read More

Why New York?

#NYCoronavirus: It's increasingly apparent that New York is suffering more severely from the coronavirus pandemic than any other part of the U.S. and most of the rest of the world – raising stark questions for city and state leaders. What is it about New York, and especially New York City, that made it especially vulnerable to infection and death? And how can that be changed before the next virus breaks loose? Read More

Policing the MTA’s overtime police

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority has assigned its own police force to monitor attendance and overtime use by Long Island Railroad employees, the Daily News reports. Read More

A first look at de Blasio care

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio made a splash this morning by announcing a plan "to guarantee health care" for every city resident. Although his office called it "the largest, most comprehensive plan in the nation," the proposal appears – based on limited details provided so far – to be a relatively modest expansion of existing safety-net programs. Read More

Single payer, double standard

The New York City Council's vote of support on Tuesday for a statewide single-payer health plan showed curious timing from a fiscal point of view. Two weeks before, sponsors of the New York Health Act told union officials that they were changing the bill in ways that could cost the city billions of dollars per year. Details of these high-stakes changes won't be available until next month, yet Council members chose to back the measure anyway – effectively endorsing a blank check. Read More

NY’s leaky gas taxes

When motorists in New York top off their gas tanks this Labor Day weekend, they’ll be paying an average of about 45 cents per gallon in state and local fuel taxes—the 5th highest total in the nation, and second highest in the Northeast. Read More

NYC pension costs shooting up

Taxpayer-funded pension contributions in New York City will need to increase by a total of $732 million between fiscal years 2018 and 2020 due to the pension funds' paltry investment earnings in the recently concluded 2016 fiscal year, City Comptroller Scott Stringer has just disclosed. Read More


Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.


Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org


The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.