Before area taxpayers and their counterparts statewide get too excited over the looming lower property tax hike for next year, they need to be mindful of the other side of the coin.

It’s been disclosed that the local property tax cap would be less than 1 percent. Amidst that seemingly good news is the harsh warning to local governments from state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.

Under the formula, the tax cap allows the levies outside New York City to increase by a maximum of 2 percent or the inflation rate in the previous rate, which ever is lower. That same cap can be adjusted if reasonable arguments are raised for special situations.

Next year’s tax scale was set at the end of June for all municipalities — villages, towns, counties and cities — whose fiscal year traditionally begins on Jan. 1. In the first six-month span, the consumer price index inched up only to 0.73 percent. Records show that’s the lowest it’s been since the cap was initiated in 2011.

Although property owners might view the paltry tax hike as manna from the heavens, the comptroller definitely envisions it as problematic. DiNapoli cautions that municipalities will likely be compelled to function in different ways under the new limits bound to be imposed. The comptroller is correct when he predicts tougher budget options. Among them: reducing staffing levels, coping with cutbacks in the delivery of services and fund balances, and the always-costly result of deferring certain infrastructure projects.

It’s not beyond the realm of possibility that due to the upward trend in inflation rates, the school districts too will be adversely affected by the zero growth in the vital property tax revenues they depend on to exist. No doubt they will encounter budget problems because of the cost for such items as personnel, the related expense of health care and benefits for teachers and administration, and energy costs. Unfortunately, in the current environment, those latter costs for the schools tend to grow much faster than the overall household rate of inflation.

E.J. McMahon, president of the Albany-based Empire Center for Public Policy, takes note that DiNapoli’s concerns — outlined in a recent news release from the comptroller’s office — fails to cite the nagging state mandates that have been driving up local expenses, McMahon adds that the collective bargaining rules under the Taylor Law literally hamper most communities’ efforts to save money. And McMahon also points out that DiNapoli, considered a close ally of the public employee unions, has refrained from becoming directly involved with any mandate issues.

School officials must brace themselves for the task. As DiNapoli warns: More than 1,800 school districts will have roughly $88.3 million less in tax levy growth compared to what they had in 2015, when the factor was 1.56 percent and $135.1 million less than they would have had when the cap was 2 percent in 2012 and 2013.

This marks the fourth annual budget cycle under the property tax cap enacted in 2011. School districts have generated the largest share of New York state’s high local property taxes.


© 2015 Niagara Gazette

You may also like

It’s never simple arithmetic with schools

Earlier this week, the Empire Center did its own report on the plummeting numbers when it comes to students. Overall, the 2019-20 enrollment is at its lowest levels in New York state in the last 30 years. Read More

Cuomo’s claim on property taxes omits mandates

In 2015, the state capped the local Medicaid share, saving local governments more than $3 billion per year. "Even with the freeze, Medicaid remains one of the largest expenses faced by local governments in New York—and one they have little or no means to control," wrote Bill Hammond, director of health policy at the Empire Center for Public Policy, which is fiscally conservative.  Read More

Flanagan criticizes Senate Democrats on taxes

E.J. McMahon, of the right-leaning Empire Center for Public Policy, said the tax cap is a "wonderful thing" but it is not a tax cut. He looked over the list the Senate Democrats provided of credits, exemptions and reductions, and said they aren’t what most people would consider a tax cut.  Read More

School budgets: Find out how much your property taxes may increase

Schools, excluding the Big 5 districts of Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Yonkers and New York City, are proposing to increase taxes by $539 million despite an enrollment drop of 7,827 students, or a 0.5% decline, the Empire Center for State Policy, a fiscally conservative think tank said. Read More

Region’s homeowners among hardest hit by taxes in state

Those findings were based on data compiled and supplied by the Empire Center for Public Policy in Albany, which gathers and adds tax rates for every county, municipality and school district to show the combined toll of school and government taxes for any place in the state, adjusted to smooth differences in assessment levels and allow comparisons. Read More

Property taxes: These places pay the most in New York

The report, released by the Empire Center, a fiscally conservative think tank in Albany, found the effective tax rate for each region of the state. Calculating tax rates can be tricky, particularly in New York, where property owners face various taxes from multiple jurisdictions, including counties, towns and cities, as well as schools. Read More

Schenectady, Niskayuna top property tax lists for Capital Region

Schenectady’s property tax rate is $48.20 per $1,000 of home value, according to the Benchmarking New York report produced by the Empire Center, a fiscally conservative think tank based in Albany. Read More

Orleans County communities had five of the 10 highest tax rates in Finger Lakes for 2018, Empire Center report says

ALBANY — Orleans County communities have five of the top 10 highest tax rates for 2018, according to the Empire Center’s annual Benchmarking NY rankings, released this week. Read More