Today was the (rescheduled) deadline for filing 2020 federal income tax returns, which makes this New York’s third annual SALT-Free Income Tax Day. By midnight tonight, most Empire State residents will have been reminded once again that—despite what they’ve repeatedly been told by Governor Cuomo and other New York politicians—the 2017 federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) did not raise their federal taxes.

On a most superficial level, it might seem obvious that the TCJA provision capping state and local tax (SALT) deductions at $10,000 would have to represent a tax increase for many middle-class residents of high-taxed states like New York, where property taxes on a downstate suburban house can approach or exceed the limit.

In reality, however, only a very small percentage of New Yorkers, mainly income millionaires, have been paying higher federal taxes due to the SALT cap. That’s because the TCJA also included various other provisions that reduced federal taxes in other ways, most notably the following:

1. Income tax rates were reduced. From a 2017 Tax Foundation report, here’s a table showing the income brackets and rates for married couples filing jointly, immediately before and after the new federal law took effect in 2018:

Note: based on these rate changes alone, couples with taxable incomes of $77,040 saved $1,751, and those with taxable income of $156,150 saved $4,114.

2. The standard deduction was nearly doubled. Prior to 2018, standard deductions ranged from $6,500 for single filers to $13,000 for married joint filers. Those amounts were raised to between $12,000 and $24,000, respectively. This meant that if you were previously entitled to itemized deductions of less than $24,000, including SALT, you would now be better off claiming the standard deduction.

Unsurprisingly, the number of itemizers in New York’s federal income tax base shrank by nearly two thirds in 2018, from 3,427,800 to 1,211,470. The decrease was concentrated among middle class filers, with incomes ranging from $50,000 to $200,000; these households saved money and saw the chore of tax filing greatly simplified.

3. The child credit was increased—and eligibility for the credit greatly expanded. Specifically, the credit went from $1,000 to $2,000, and the income level at which the credit phases out went from $110,000 to $400,000 for married couples. For an income-eligible couple with three kids, the credit equates to a savings of $3,000—equivalent all by itself to the tax break previously associated with more than $10,000 in SALT deductions.

4. The alternative minimum tax (AMT) was significantly rolled back. The AMT dates back to the late 1960s, when it was created to ensure that a very small number of mega-rich taxpayers could not exploit various loopholes and tax shelters (long since closed) to avoid paying any taxes.  Over the ensuing decades, however, the AMT was never fully adjusted to keep pace with inflation and significant tax code reforms.

The complex AMT formula required a separate tax calculation that disallowed certain “preference items” including total SALT deductions and exemptions for dependent family members. As a result, in recent decades it had fallen mainly on the six-figure middle class of high-tax states like New York, while affecting only a small share of the highest-earning individuals.

As explained in this Tax Policy Center brief, the TCJA “significantly reduced” the AMT’s impact. According to IRS data, the share of New York taxpayers hit by the AMT fell sharply in 2018—from 5.9 percent of filers in 2017 to just 0.2 percent in 2018. In the $200,000 to $500,000 income bracket, the incidence of AMT filers fell from 81.6 percent to 1.7 percent; in the $500,000 to $1 million bracket, the drop was from 68 percent to 3.3 percent.  For these New Yorkers, even the capped SALT deduction represented an improvement over a previously allowed deduction of zero. (Among those benefiting from this change, according to his publicly disclosed tax filings, was Governor Cuomo himself.)

Misleading numbers

In 2018, the first year under the revamped and nearly SALT-free tax code, total federal income-tax payments by New Yorkers fell by nearly $3.4 billion, according to IRS statistics. The net 2 percent ­average reduction for Empire State residents was barely half the ­national average and among the smallest changes registered in any state—which is no surprise, for two reasons: (1) Empire State residents have higher average incomes, which are taxed at higher rates and qualified for smaller average percentage savings­ under the TCJA, and (2) the dampening effect of the SALT cap among very high earners.

Cuomo repeatedly has claimed that the SALT cap is costing New Yorkers up to $15 billion a year in higher federal taxes. This number apparently is an estimate of the amount New Yorkers would now be saving if the SALT deduction had been preserved in combination with all of the other tax cuts featured in the TCJA. As counterfactuals go, that approach is purest fantasy: the Republican-dominated Congress of 2017 would never have enacted the same tax bill without the large offsetting “pay for” of revenue raised from the SALT cap.

Going forward, leaving untouched the rest of the TCJA changes, restoration of the SALT deduction would mainly benefit high-income residents of New York and a handful of other high-tax states. And it would cost the Treasury at least $80 billion a year at a time when the federal government is already pouring out trillions in new spending.

U.S. Rep. Thomas Suozzi of Nassau County, citing Cuomo’s grossly misleading SALT impact statistics, has threatened to block President Biden’s forthcoming proposals for tax hikes unless they include repeal of the SALT cap. But restoring full SALT deductions would be an exceedingly heavy lift for congressional Democratic leaders, including New York’s own Charles Schumer, the majority leader of the Senate. Republicans and conservatives relish the opportunity to accuse Democrats of favoring a bigger tax break for the wealthy. Progressive Democrats, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, are sure to join the chorus in opposition.

In the meantime, this much is certain:

  • the income millionaires who already pay a disproportionate share of New York State’s own income taxes have been hit with significant effective tax hike due to the SALT cap, which will now be exacerbated by tax hikes enacted with the new state budget, and
  • anything Cuomo, Suozzi or other New York pols say about the supposed impact of the SALT cap on middle-class families needs to be taken with… a large grain of a certain common seasoning.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

82 Questions Hochul’s Pandemic Report Should Answer

This is the month when New Yorkers are due to finally receive an official report on the state's response to the Covid-19 pandemic, one of the deadliest disasters in state history. T Read More

The Real Lack of Courage Driving NYC Congestion Pricing

Governor Hochul is taking heat after postponing the state’s years-old plan to charge drivers to enter lower Manhattan. As critics slam her for lacking “political courage,” it’s an appropriate time to examine some of the underlying issues that congestion pricing was meant to indirectly mitigate—because many if not most advocates were afraid to touch those issues themselves. And if congestion pricing proponents are to be taken at their word about their concern for MTA finances, or traffic, or air quality, they must show some of the same courage they’ve accused the governor of lacking. Read More

To Encourage Recycling, Pols Move To Trash The Legislature

New York state lawmakers in recent years have surrendered some of their policymaking and taxing powers to the executive branch. With the 2024 legislative session coming to close, they’re poised to go even further and turn those powers over to an organization outside of government entirely. Read More

Lawmakers Seek To Revive a $10 Fee for Prescriptions That Was Dropped by DFS

A plan to require a $10.18 "dispensing fee" for filling drug prescriptions is back on the table in Albany – this time in the form of legislation rather than regulation. The Read More

Running Over Taxpayers: Legislature Speeding to Protect Cadillac Benefits for NYC Retirees

Bills designed to block any change to retiree health coverage for state and local public employees have been introduced repeatedly by legislators in both parties over the past 30 years. But the latest statewide “anti-diminution” measure, inspired by an ongoing controversy in New York City, would be the broadest and most costly yet—and more than two-thirds of state lawmakers are supporting it. Read More

How a Medicaid ‘Cut’ Could Lead to More Unionization of Home Care Aides

A money-saving maneuver in the newly enacted Medicaid budget could end up increasing costs in the long term – by paving the way for more unionization of the state's burgeoning home health workforce. Read More

Eight in 10 New York towns and cities have lost population since 2020

Filling in more details of New York's ongoing demographic decline, the Census Bureau has just released updated local population estimates showing that 80 percent of the state's towns and cities have lost residents since 2020. In addition to New York Ci Read More

Sales tax receipts are signaling slow growth in most of New York State

After rising sharply with an extra push from the inflation surge of 2022, sales tax receipts in New York grew much more slowly during the first four months of this year, according to from state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli's office. Statewide sales tax Read More