Jay Walder, Gov. Paterson’s pick to head the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, took questions from Democratic senators today ahead of their Thursday vote on his nomination.

Of interest: Walder’s views on private-public partnerships and whether then can work in transit.

Regarding public-private partnerships on subway systems, Walder noted his experience in helping to run London’s transit system. In 2003, against the objections of Walder and other Tube officials, Britain’s national government privatized responsibility for the Tube to two construction consortia under 30-year contracts.

Walder correctly noted today that the Tube deal, which fell apart four years later, was a disaster for British taxpayers.

With that “deep, rich, not positive experience” in mind, Walder said, “I don’t believe private-public partnerships for the New York subway make any sense at all. It does not fit for the subway system.”

Walder’s right. If there’s a way for the public sector to fob off responsibility for a major subway transit system to private-sector companies whose loss and role is necessarily limited by bankruptcy, nobody has figured it out, and it’s a dubious use of political energy and taxpayer money to keep trying.

But Walder had a more nuanced view on PPPs in general, saying that “there have been private-public partnerships used effectively in London” in other areas of government.

One wonders if he means the buses.

Walder was quiet on PPPs as they relate to buses, and no senator caught it.

But London has an effective, efficient bus system largely run by long-term competitive contractors under competent government management (an important ingredient!).

Bus service is better suited for public-private partnerships than is subway maintenance and construction. Bus service can be broken into small batches and contracted out to many different operators, so if one contractor goes bankrupt, another one, or the government, can easily step in and take over.

Plus, start-up bus operators can secure financing relatively easily, because lenders can repossess the buses and sell them to other operators to recoup their money if it doesn’t work out — whereas lenders can’t exactly repossess the Tube or its assets.

Walder said that his more general experience in London opened his eyes “to the critical importance of the bus system.” He noted that London’s buses move six million people daily, via dedicated bus lanes with good city enforcement.

While Walder didn’t say so today, London’s sytem is a good example of how the government can competently do its job in providing the critical public infrastructure — the well-policed bus lanes — and then managing private-sector contractors to make sure that they competently do their jobs.

If Walder is bent on expanding and improving New York’s bus service, as he said that he is, his careful comments on PPPs and the Tube didn’t foreclose the possibility that he’ll try to do so under a private-public partnership model.*

*Legislative approval, federal approval, and/or successful union negotiations would be required — but that’s another post.

You may also like

New York Has Widened Its Lead in Per-Capita Spending on Medicaid

New York's per-capita Medicaid spending soared to more than double the nationwide rate in 2018, widening its gap with the other 49 states. Read More

Essential Plan surplus hits $3B

As Governor Cuomo pleads for financial help from Washington, one of his state's programs is sitting on $3 billion in unspent federal aid: the Essential Plan. Read More

A grim toll gets worse

The full toll of the coronavirus pandemic in New York is likely thousands higher than the official death tallies, according to newly released federal data. Read More

Upstate escapes the worst

With the coronavirus pandemic hitting some parts of New York much harder than others, Governor Cuomo has signaled that he will begin to relax shutdown restrictions in low-virus parts of the state. Here's a closer look at how infection and fatality rates vary from region to region. Read More

Why New York?

#NYCoronavirus: It's increasingly apparent that New York is suffering more severely from the coronavirus pandemic than any other part of the U.S. and most of the rest of the world – raising stark questions for city and state leaders. What is it about New York, and especially New York City, that made it especially vulnerable to infection and death? And how can that be changed before the next virus breaks loose? Read More

NY is shorted on virus relief

Although New York is taking the brunt of the coronavirus pandemic – with 43 percent of the nation's known cases and 40 percent of the deaths – the state is due to receive only 5 percent of the $150 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund just established by Congress. Read More

NY’s uninsured rate hits new low

Bucking the national trend, New York's uninsured rate dropped for the eighth consecutive year, new data from the Census Bureau show. The share of New Yorkers lacking health coverage in 2018 was 5.4 percent in 2018, down from 5.7 percent the year before. The number of people lacking health coverage dropped by about 72,000, to just over 1 million. Both the rate and the number are roughly half what they were in 2013, the year before the Affordable Care Act went into effect. Read More

Policing the MTA’s overtime police

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority has assigned its own police force to monitor attendance and overtime use by Long Island Railroad employees, the Daily News reports. Read More


Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.


Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org


The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.