screen-shot-2013-08-19-at-11430-pm-2897517

A full package of basic welfare benefits in New York State is now worth $38,004 — seventh highest among those offered by the 50 states and the District of Columbia, according to The Work vs. Welfare Trade-Off, a study released today by the Cato Institute.

Cato estimates the welfare package available in the Empire State is the “pre-tax wage equivalent” of $41,251, which is 110.5 percent of the actualstatewide median wage of 39,562 (i.e., the median amount made by people who are employed).

The package tallied up in the Cato study includes cash or equivalent values for the full spectrum of federal and state welfare benefits: Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as Food Stamps), Medicaid, the Women Infants and Children (WIC) program, and The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), plus housing and energy subsidies. Using a narrower definition excluding everything but TANF, SNAP and Medicaid, the value of the basic welfare package was estimated at $24,007, ranking 5th among the states and D.C., which Cato estimated was equivalent to a pre-tax wage of $18,490.

So what’s the key takeaway here? Study authors Michael Tanner and Charles Hughes summarize it this way:

The current welfare system provides such a high level of benefits that it acts as a disincentive for work. Welfare currently pays more than a minimum-wage job in 35 states, even after accounting for the Earned Income Tax Credit, and in 13 states it pays more than $15 per hour. If Congress and state legislatures are serious about reducing welfare dependence and rewarding work, they should consider strengthening welfare work requirements, removing exemptions, and narrowing the definition of work. Moreover, states should consider ways to shrink the gap between the value of welfare and work by reducing current benefit levels and tightening eligibility requirements.

 

Tags:

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Study: EITC makes people healthier

Here’s another reason to celebrate New York’s Earned Income Tax Credit: It measurably improves the health and longevity of those who receive it. Read More

Welfare is back

New York City's welfare caseloads are expanding again—a deliberate and predictable outcome of Mayor Bill De Blasio's policies, as Manhattan Institute's Steve Eide points out in his new "Poverty and Progress in New York" report. Read More

Welfare caseloads poised to grow

New York State’s enacted budget and New York City’s proposed budget for fiscal 2015 both project that welfare cash assistance caseloads will decline in the year ahead. Since the city accounts for nearly two-thirds of the state caseload, those trends are closely related. Read More

A welfare reform success story

When welfare reform was enacted in 1996, creating the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant, a less-noticed provision was the greatly increased focus on collecting child support for custodial parents (almost always mothers) and their children. Read More

Getting Food Stamps is a SNAP

The Food Stamp Program has changed its name to SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program -- an appropriate moniker, since in current economic conditions, states are making it a snap to qualify. Read More

The welfare-to-work equation

The Obama administration's offer to waive work requirements for recipients of Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) is being opposed by leading congressional Republicans, who have introduced legislation to overturn the action. While state governments generally welcome added flexibility in administering federal programs, there is a risk the new federal policy will be used in some states to undermine the work-first principle at the heart of the successful 1996 welfare reform. Read More

More welfare de-form

A bill pending in the state Senate would weaken a key underpinning of welfare reform -- the Work Experience Program, or WEP. This is a one-house measure for now, and it's sponsored by a member of the democratic minority, to boot. But many of Albany's worst ideas have been born as one-house minority bills, so this one bears watching. Read More