screen-shot-2016-02-09-at-9-27-35-am-232x300-8155173Here’s another reason to celebrate New York’s Earned Income Tax Credit: It measurably improves the health and longevity of those who receive it.

A new study from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health estimates that EITC recipients in states that supplement the federal credit gain an average of 2.2 years of healthy life compared to their counterparts in states without a supplement.

The study, published in the September 7 edition of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, further finds that the EITC is cost-effective, putting the states’ investment at $7,686 per life-year.

“This study suggests that relatively small investments in EITC might not only reduce poverty but also improve health and longevity,” the authors wrote. “It may also carry the additional benefit of reversing declines in life expectancy among low-income Americans.”

Enacted in 1975, the federal EITC is a tax credit designed to boost the earning power of low-income working families. This year, it’s worth as much as $6,269 for a qualifying parent with three children.

Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia have supplemented the national program with credits of their own. New York State’s EITC, which dates back to 1994, adds 30 percent to the federal credit. New York City adopted its own smaller EITC in 2004. Taken together, the three credits combined can be worth as much as $8,427.

Almost one-fifth of tax filers across the state claimed the EITC in 2015, collecting $4.1 billion in federal credits and $1 billion in state credits.

An Empire Center report in February showed that existing EITCs, when combined with other credits and benefits, can boost the income of a single parent working full-time from $9 an hour to the equivalent of $16.81.

The report further showed that the EITC is a more cost-effective tool for lifting New Yorkers out of poverty than a minimum wage hike–because it targets money to those who need it most without placing a job-destroying burden on business.

The authors of the  Columbia study point to another upside of the EITC. They note the program’s health effects are much stronger than those of traditional welfare programs, such as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, which has actually been associated with higher mortality. One explanation, they suggest, is that EITC doesn’t merely increase income, but also gives recipients an incentive to be employed, which in itself is correlated with better health.

Supplemental EITC appears to solve many of the concerns of traditional welfare programs in that it (1) does not trade one upstream determinant (employment) for another (income) and (2) increases employment and earnings indefinitely without placing new restrictions on recipients.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

Big bucks, no impact

The billions of dollars funneled from New York's treasury to movie and TV producers had no statistically significant impact on the industry's employment in the Empire State through 2017, according to a new multi-state study of such tax incentives. Read More

Not his father’s wage subsidy?

As part of his ongoing push for a statewide $15 minimum wage, Governor Andrew Cuomo repeatedly has denounced what he calls “the mother of all corporate loopholes.” In Buffalo this week, he amped up his rhetoric, reportedly charging that “business is stealing from taxpayers of this state.” Cuomo wasn’t referring to any of the notable business tax giveaways he has personally promoted, such as the $420 million a year the state doles out to wealthy film and TV producers, or the state's $750 million speculative investment in billionaire Elon Musk’s solar panel factory in Buffalo, or the 100 percent tax exemptions that will flow to the handpicked corporate occupants of START-UP NY zones. Read More

Cuomo’s wage proposal in context

How would a proposed $15-per-hour statewide minimum wage compare to current pay ranges and historical precedents in New York? Read More

Higher fast-food wages could backfire

There's a good reason for Governor Cuomo's Fast Food Wage Board to decide against raising the minimum wage for fast food workers: many of them won't benefit from it. Read More

Welfare is back

New York City's welfare caseloads are expanding again—a deliberate and predictable outcome of Mayor Bill De Blasio's policies, as Manhattan Institute's Steve Eide points out in his new "Poverty and Progress in New York" report. Read More

Welfare caseloads poised to grow

New York State’s enacted budget and New York City’s proposed budget for fiscal 2015 both project that welfare cash assistance caseloads will decline in the year ahead. Since the city accounts for nearly two-thirds of the state caseload, those trends are closely related. Read More

NY ranks high in welfare benefits

A full package of basic welfare benefits in New York State is now worth $38,004 — seventh highest among those offered by the 50 states and the District of Columbia, according to The Work vs. Welfare Trade-Off, a study released today by the Cato Institute. Read More

A grey lady correction on minimum wage

The New York Times has agreed to print a correction of this article about the minimum wage issue, which includes inaccurate information implicitly attributed to Empire Center senior fellow Russell Sykes. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.