event3-4449835

A proposed state constitutional amendment that would shift budget-making power to Albany’s legislative leaders went down to a resounding defeat at the polls on Nov. 8.

The Empire Center for Public Policy played a leading role in sounding the alarm over the budget-busting implications of the amendment, which was Proposal One on the Nov 8 ballot. The anti-Prop One campaign kicked into high gear after an Empire Center luncheon forum on September 20, where the keynoter was former Gov. Hugh L. Carey and other distinguished speakers included former Mayor Edward I. Koch. The event titled, “Breaking the Budget in New York State: What’s at Stake in November’s Referendum” was held at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in New York City and was attended by leading fiscal experts, business leaders and reporters.

Carey noted that the change has been called a “power grab” by state legislators. “Well,” he added, “I’d amend that. It’s a power grab and a purse grab.”

The former governor — a Democrat widely credited with holding down spending and reducing taxes and debt during his tenure — said passage of the proposed amendment would deprive future governors of the power they need to deal with any fiscal crisis like the one he encountered upon taking office in 1975.

Hearkening back to the state promotional slogan invented by his administration, Carey concluded: “For God’s sake, if you love New York, don’t let Prop One become law.”

Former Mayor Edward I. Koch, another speaker at the Empire Center forum, also was critical of the amendment.

Although New York City representatives make up the largehst single bloc of state legislators, Koch said that giving the Legislature more power in budget-making would not be good for the city.

As mayor, Koch said, “I knew if there was one person who would be defending the state of New York and all of the localities in the state it was the governor. So to deprive [the governor] of a power which he currently has … and give it to the state Legislature, would be nuts.”

Other panelists at the forum included:

Peter Goldmark, budget director under Carey in 1975, who called the amendment “profoundly irresponsible.”

“It is reckless and destructive, and flies not only in the face of common sense, but in the face of our own history.” said Goldmark, who now is program director for the Environmental Defense Fund.

Dall Forsythe, a noted academic expert on public finance who was Governor Mario Cuomo’s budget director from 1988 to 1991, said called Proposal One “very dangerous.”

“I think that placing executive budgeting with legislative budgeting is a mistake, and certainly a mistake in the state of New York,” said Forsythe, a distinguished lecturer at Baruch College.

Diana Fortuna, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, predicted the amendment would not result in timely adoption of the annual state budget, despite supporters’ claims to the contrary.

“The proposal that will be touted in everybody’s mailbox from their state legislators over the coming weeks as ending late state budgets in fact makes significant changes to the budget process only after the deadline is missed,” she said. “So you could say it only gets serious about change after the budget is late, and then it gets serious in a way that is destructive.”

John S. Dyson, a former state Power Authority chairman who also served as both state commerce commissioner and commissioner of agriculture and markets under Carey, warned the Legislature could not responsibly exercise significantly greater budgeting power.

“The Legislature would be completely incapable, in my experience in working with them for thirty years, in putting together a budget,” said Dyson, now chairman of a private investment firm.

About the Author

Tim Hoefer

Tim Hoefer is president & CEO of the Empire Center for Public Policy.

Read more by Tim Hoefer

You may also like

Streamlining SEQR

Major residential, commercial and industrial developments throughout the country are subject to an array of federal and state laws designed to protect the environment, buttressed nearly everywhere by local land-use regulations addressing the community impacts of such projects. Read More

Taking a Longer View on Our Local Budgets

New York’s property tax levy cap makes it more important than ever for local governments and school districts to bring their long-term spending into line with long-term revenues. But most localities don’t issue budget forecasts that look further than a year ahead —making it it easier to put off tough decisions. Read More

The Cost of Their Intentions: An Analysis of the Mayoral Candidates’ Spending Proposals

In the weeks leading up to the original September 11th primary date, the mayoral candidates would occasionally acknowledge that their plans might have to change if New York City encountered a full-blown recession. Read More

Breaking the Budget in New York State

After failing to adopt a budget on time for 20 of the last 21 years, New York State legislative leaders are seeking voter approval of a constitutional amendment that they insist on characterizing as “budget reform.” Budget de-form would be more like it. Read More

Albany Oink

New York’s state legislators have a long history of lavish pork-barrel spending. Much of this spending comes in the form of appropriations known as “member items” — operating grants to local community groups, labor unions and advocacy organizations. But while individual senators and Assembly members are willing to selectively publicize the nature and purpose of their own pet projects, the Legislature as a whole has tried to keep much of the budgeting process for the member items under wraps. Read More

Breaking the Budget in New York State

Video from a conference hosted by E.J. McMahon Read More

Blueprint for a Better Budget

New York State is broke. Like a runaway train, New York's budget is in danger of running completely off the rails. It needs to be brought under control—before it's too late. Read More

Property Taxes: The Case for a Cap

Governor David Paterson has proposed legislation to implement a cap on school property tax levies in New York State. His original tax cap bill was passed by the state Senate in August 2008, but died in the state Assembly. Paterson's latest tax cap proposal was submitted to the Legislature on July 30, 2010. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.