A pair of Senate Republicans are arguing, on procedural grounds, against Governor Hochul’s plan to allow more charter schools. There’s just one problem: they didn’t appear to have the same concerns when Hochul and other governors proposed things they liked. And it’s not the first contradiction they’ve served up in service to the sworn enemy of charter schools, the teachers unions.

Senators Jim Tedisco (R-Schenectady County) and Dan Stec (R-Warren County), who both won re-election with backing from the statewide teachers union, posted similarly crafted tweets hours apart which reacted to Hochul’s February 1 budget proposal. The senators’ tweets praise Hochul’s plan to increase school aid but oppose her plan to change the state’s cap on the number of public charter schools in New York City, seemingly on procedural grounds. 

Hochul’s proposal was placed in what’s known as an Article VII bill, which includes the changes in law necessary to implement the spending that’s appropriated in the annual state budget. The practice of including unrelated policy measures, such as minimum-wage increases or rent control, became commonplace during the last decade under Governor Andrew Cuomo. The appropriateness of this strategy has been a subject of debate.  

By quibbling about the way Hochul is proposing these changes, both Tedisco and Stec seemed to have found a tortured way to oppose new charter schools on procedural grounds without having to defend their opposition on the merits. 

There was just one problem: both senators have repeatedly supported the inclusion of unrelated budget policies — when they agreed with them. In fact, in Stec’s case, he had just days earlier applauded Hochul for including changes to gun-control rules affecting the Adirondack Park in the same budget proposal where he urged her not to “cram in controversial policy.” Last spring, he called on Hochul to change bail rules in the state budget. The year before, Stec wanted provisions related to broadband included. None of these changes appear to have had measurable impacts on state spending that would justify working them into a budget. 

Tedisco has at least paid lip-service to the need for thorough vetting and debate of policy matters. During 2017 and 2018, when Republicans controlled the chamber, he voted for multiple budget proposals and deals that shoehorned unrelated matters. And in the years before and since, nothing has stopped him from periodically applauding the inclusion of agreeable non-budgetary items, such as background-check requirements on adult-care facilities in 2014 and the property tax cap in 2019. 

Tedisco and Stec appear to have been participating in an organized effort by the New York State United Teachers, the statewide teachers union, to make similar statements about the budget, praising the massive increase in state aid while condemning Hochul’s charter-cap changes (some of which featured sensational claims about charter schools having “devastating effects” or that having more would “hurt” other schools). 

NYSUT last year asked candidates to back a package of anti-charter measures designed to shrink if not eliminate public charter schools — which Stec and Tedisco have likely agreed to support in privately submitted questionnaires required to receive the union’s political endorsement. 

This isn’t the first time the pair have twisted themselves in pretzels at NYSUT’s behest. 

Both campaigned for office with complaints about the state’s tax burden. Yet both have defended New York’s K-12 costs, the country’s highest on a per-pupil basis, which produce education outcomes that are at best middling. New York spent 36 percent more, per student, than Massachusetts in school year 2019-20. More than a quarter of the state budget now goes toward school aid, and K-12 costs are the single largest driver behind local property taxes. 

Tedisco in 2019 went so far as to jab legislative Democrats for not hiking state school aid even further. 

Both are emblematic of the ongoing struggle by New York Republicans to speak credibly about controlling government spending and meaningfully reducing the state and local tax burden, or to offer a credible vision for how New York can get a better return on its outsized K-12 spending. 

While both senators have bellyached publicly about the need to reform or end “unfunded mandates” from Albany, their acceptance of the NYSUT endorsement almost certainly means they have privately pledged that they won’t support changes to the biggest such mandates, which pertain to collective bargaining and pensions. 

It’s difficult for lawmakers to claim they’re trying to bring taxes down or education quality up when they’re seeking approval from a political organization working toward very different goals. 

You may also like

The Essential Plan’s accumulated surplus will soon break $10 billion

The accumulated surplus of the state-run Essential Plan had ballooned to $9.9 billion as of the end of December, putting it on track to break $10 billion by the close of the fiscal year on March 31, according to newly obtained records from the comptroller's office. Read More

The Hochul administration seeks more federal money for its overfunded Essential Plan

In a move that ought to raise eyebrows in Washington, the Hochul administration is requesting additional federal money for New York's Essential Plan, which is already sitting on more than $9 billion after years of running a multi-billion-dollar surplus. Read More

More Gaslighting on Gas Stoves

As the old Marx Brothers joke goes, “Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?” Doreen Harris, president and CEO of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority,   that she was setting the record straight, and that “We a Read More

Hochul puts Medicaid spending on a steeper slope

Governor Hochul is releasing the brakes on Medicaid, allowing state spending on the safety-net health plan to increase more than twice as fast as it typically did during the Cuomo administration. Read More

DiNapoli aims to curb NY’s borrowing binge

Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli has unveiled a new proposal for constitutionally curbing the state’s seemingly uncontrollable appetite for borrowing. Read More

The Full Senate Must Vote on Hochul’s Chief Judge Pick 

Governor Hochul may be getting ready to take the confirmation battle for her Court of Appeals chief judge nominee, Hector LaSalle, to the courts. Read More

Hochul’s agenda mostly sidesteps health care

Governor Hochul gave health care surprisingly little attention in her State of the State speech on Tuesday – a sign that taking on dysfunction in one-sixth of the state's economy ranks low on her list of priorities. Read More

In State Budgeting, Process Matters

At a panel event in Albany being hosted by the tomorrow morning, The Empire Center’s EJ McMahon and other budget experts and observers will discuss the timely topic of state budget process reform. Read More

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!