A pair of Senate Republicans are arguing, on procedural grounds, against Governor Hochul’s plan to allow more charter schools. There’s just one problem: they didn’t appear to have the same concerns when Hochul and other governors proposed things they liked. And it’s not the first contradiction they’ve served up in service to the sworn enemy of charter schools, the teachers unions.

Senators Jim Tedisco (R-Schenectady County) and Dan Stec (R-Warren County), who both won re-election with backing from the statewide teachers union, posted similarly crafted tweets hours apart which reacted to Hochul’s February 1 budget proposal. The senators’ tweets praise Hochul’s plan to increase school aid but oppose her plan to change the state’s cap on the number of public charter schools in New York City, seemingly on procedural grounds. 

Hochul’s proposal was placed in what’s known as an Article VII bill, which includes the changes in law necessary to implement the spending that’s appropriated in the annual state budget. The practice of including unrelated policy measures, such as minimum-wage increases or rent control, became commonplace during the last decade under Governor Andrew Cuomo. The appropriateness of this strategy has been a subject of debate.  

By quibbling about the way Hochul is proposing these changes, both Tedisco and Stec seemed to have found a tortured way to oppose new charter schools on procedural grounds without having to defend their opposition on the merits. 

There was just one problem: both senators have repeatedly supported the inclusion of unrelated budget policies — when they agreed with them. In fact, in Stec’s case, he had just days earlier applauded Hochul for including changes to gun-control rules affecting the Adirondack Park in the same budget proposal where he urged her not to “cram in controversial policy.” Last spring, he called on Hochul to change bail rules in the state budget. The year before, Stec wanted provisions related to broadband included. None of these changes appear to have had measurable impacts on state spending that would justify working them into a budget. 

Tedisco has at least paid lip-service to the need for thorough vetting and debate of policy matters. During 2017 and 2018, when Republicans controlled the chamber, he voted for multiple budget proposals and deals that shoehorned unrelated matters. And in the years before and since, nothing has stopped him from periodically applauding the inclusion of agreeable non-budgetary items, such as background-check requirements on adult-care facilities in 2014 and the property tax cap in 2019. 

Tedisco and Stec appear to have been participating in an organized effort by the New York State United Teachers, the statewide teachers union, to make similar statements about the budget, praising the massive increase in state aid while condemning Hochul’s charter-cap changes (some of which featured sensational claims about charter schools having “devastating effects” or that having more would “hurt” other schools). 

NYSUT last year asked candidates to back a package of anti-charter measures designed to shrink if not eliminate public charter schools — which Stec and Tedisco have likely agreed to support in privately submitted questionnaires required to receive the union’s political endorsement. 

This isn’t the first time the pair have twisted themselves in pretzels at NYSUT’s behest. 

Both campaigned for office with complaints about the state’s tax burden. Yet both have defended New York’s K-12 costs, the country’s highest on a per-pupil basis, which produce education outcomes that are at best middling. New York spent 36 percent more, per student, than Massachusetts in school year 2019-20. More than a quarter of the state budget now goes toward school aid, and K-12 costs are the single largest driver behind local property taxes. 

Tedisco in 2019 went so far as to jab legislative Democrats for not hiking state school aid even further. 

Both are emblematic of the ongoing struggle by New York Republicans to speak credibly about controlling government spending and meaningfully reducing the state and local tax burden, or to offer a credible vision for how New York can get a better return on its outsized K-12 spending. 

While both senators have bellyached publicly about the need to reform or end “unfunded mandates” from Albany, their acceptance of the NYSUT endorsement almost certainly means they have privately pledged that they won’t support changes to the biggest such mandates, which pertain to collective bargaining and pensions. 

It’s difficult for lawmakers to claim they’re trying to bring taxes down or education quality up when they’re seeking approval from a political organization working toward very different goals. 

You may also like

Feds Move To Close Medicaid’s ‘MCO Tax’ Loophole, Spelling Trouble for New York

New York's budget has sprung its first major leak just five days after being finalized by Governor Hochul and the Legislature. On Tuesday, federal officials announced a that would Read More

Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget

The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan: Top lines Read More

How Albany Could Save Millions by Closing a Medicaid Loophole

A glitch in state insurance law is allowing doctors to collect Medicaid fees that are sometimes hundreds of times higher than the program normally pays, costing taxpayers millions of dollars a year. Read More

Hochul Pushes New Energy Tax Past Next Election

Governor Hochul has further delayed what amounts to a tax on energy until after the next general election.  Almost six years after the state adopted an aggressive emissions-cutting Read More

Sorting Fact from Fiction on the Future of Medicaid

As Washington contemplates cutbacks to federal funding for Medicaid, officials in Albany have reacted in two self-contradictory ways. On one hand, they warn of Read More

New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected

The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More

Hochul Hides the Specifics of a Looming Tax on Health Insurance

The Hochul administration has requested federal approval for a multibillion-dollar "MCO tax" on health plans without announcing the move or providing details to the public. As by l Read More

Hochul’s CDPAP Overhaul Hands a Costly Win to 1199

Governor Hochul's overhaul of the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program reached a milestone Monday when she named a Georgia-based company as the winning bidder to be the program's statewide "fiscal intermediary" – Read More