kolb-199x300-4311783Any plan to reduce or eliminate what local governments pay into New York’s Medicaid budget would inevitably create winners and losers. The Assembly Republicans’ version, unveiled last month, is no exception.

Assembly Minority Leader Brian Kolb and his members are proposing to phase out Medicaid contributions by county governments over the next 10 years while cutting New York City’s contribution in half over the next 20 years.

Likely to come out ahead under this scenario are the taxpayers in the five boroughs and most upstate counties, because their savings on local Medicaid costs would outstrip their share of the expense shifted to state government.

Likely to come out behind are residents of Long Island and the downstate suburbs, where Medicaid costs are relatively low and state tax payments are relatively high. Also clear losers would be commuters who work in New York but live out-of-state—since they pay no local taxes here but account for about 15 percent of state revenues.

The rough numbers are shown in the chart below. It’s based on local Medicaid costs provided by the Association of Counties, and a regional breakdown of 2010-11 state revenues from the Rockefeller Institute of Government.

screen-shot-2018-04-19-at-9-24-02-am-6718216

Some other states require local governments to pay a small part of Medicaid costs, but the cost shift by New York is bigger than those of all other states combined. For most counties, Medicaid is the single largest budget expense—and often exceeds their entire revenue from property taxes.

Governor Mario Cuomo first proposed to phase out the county contribution in 1994—with the catch that counties would have had to give up a share of sales tax revenue in trade.

County contributions were growth-capped by Governor George Pataki and later frozen by Governor Andrew Cuomo.

Last year, U.S. Representatives John Faso (R-Kinderhook) and Chris Collins (R-Clarence) cosponsored federal legislation requiring New York to eliminate Medicaid contributions for all counties outside New York City. The proposal was also included as an amendment to various bills intended to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, none of which ultimately passed.

The winners and losers of that plan—analyzed here, here and herewere significantly different because it omitted New York City from the takeover. All counties outside the city stood to save money under that version, while New York City would have paid substantially more.

The Assembly GOP’s takeover plan is part of a broad bill meant to reduce benefit “cliffs” in various public assistance programs, increase certain tax credits and generally reduce the burden of property taxes.

Backers say they would finance the Medicaid takeover and other expenses by cutting costs elsewhere, including a 50% reduction in the film and TV production tax credit and elimination of the property tax rebate checks.

However, those ideas are not included in the proposed legislation, would not cover the full cost of the proposed expenditures and could be implemented with or without a Medicaid takeover. They are not factored into the cost-benefit analysis above, which looks at the impact of the takeover standing alone.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

How a Medicaid ‘Cut’ Could Lead to More Unionization of Home Care Aides

A money-saving maneuver in the newly enacted Medicaid budget could end up increasing costs in the long term – by paving the way for more unionization of the state's burgeoning home health workforce. Read More

Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending

The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget. Read More

Albany’s New Health Insurance Tax Comes with Few Limits

The newly enacted state budget imposes a multibillion-dollar tax on health insurance without specifying who must pay how much – leaving those basic details to be decided later by the health commissioner in negotiation wit Read More

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

A Politically Active Medical Group Gets $29 Million in ‘Distressed’ Provider Funds

State officials awarded $29 million in 'distressed' provider funding to a politically active medical group in the Bronx, state records confirm. a network of physicians and other he Read More

Albany Lawmakers Push a $4 Billion Tax on Health Insurance

Legislative leaders are proposing an additional $4 billion tax on health insurance plans in the upcoming state budget – but withholding specifics of how it would work. Read More