irish_600kg_euro_chap_2009-300x201-6361334Legislation aimed at compelling health insurers to pass along their federal tax savings to policyholders whizzed through the state Senate on Monday by a bipartisan vote of 57 to 3.

The GOP-sponsored bill, S. 7587, is a pointed rebuke to Governor Andrew Cuomo, who is proposing to tax those same insurers in the name of claiming their corporate tax cut “windfall” for the state treasury.

The Republicans’ rejection of Cuomo’s tax hike is welcome. But their counterproposal tacitly buys into the governor’s wrongheaded framing—in that both parties are treating federal tax savings as a goodie for Albany to withhold or dish out, rather than the private property of private companies.

Existing state regulations, along with competitive pressures, assure that consumers will share much if not all of the insurers’ tax savings. Rather than trying to grab the money or dictate the outcome, lawmakers should let market forces do their work.

The tug-of-war between Cuomo and the Senate was triggered by the recently passed federal tax overhaul which, among other things, reduced the corporate tax rate by 14 points, from 35 percent to 21 percent.

While that cut affects all corporations—from real estate developers to fast-food chains to Walmart—Cuomo’s proposed tax increase would hit only for-profit health insurers.

He’s proposing to offset the federal cut by imposing a 14 percent surcharge on underwriting gains, which he expects to raise $140 million in the first year. It’s one of multiple of revenue-raisers, mostly aimed at the health-care industry, that Cuomo would use to help close a $4 billion budget gap.

This new surcharge would be piled on top of the state’s existing, heavy taxes on health insurance, which help give New York some of the highest premiums in the country.

The Senate bill, by contrast, seeks to compel insurers to transfer their tax savings to customers instead of the state.

The original language, as sponsored by Health Committee Chairman Kemp Hannon (R-Long Island), flatly directed that insurers’ entire tax savings “shall be returned to all policyholders.” As amended over the weekend, it would now order the Department of Financial Services (DFS), which regulates health premiums, to factor insurers’ tax savings into their actions on future rates.

This watered-down version seems largely redundant.

State and federal laws already require insurers to spend a minimum percentage of their revenue on medical claims: 82 percent for non-group and small-group policies, 85 percent for large groups. If they see a bump in revenue from tax relief and fail to lower premiums, they could find themselves exceeding their “medical loss ratio” and owing refunds.

Secondly, DFS already considers the full range of financial factors in regulating premiums—and has not been shy about cutting requested rates, even for companies that are losing money.

Lastly, New York has a fairly competitive insurance market, and companies that set premiums higher than necessary would risk losing customers.

Cuomo’s tax, meanwhile, raises fairness issues. His surcharge on underwriting gains would appear to affect only fully insured health plans, which are sold mainly to individuals and small businesses—the segments most likely to drop coverage over affordability issues. Large employers that self-insure would seem to be exempt.

In addition, a review of financial statements from 2016 suggests that the bulk of the tax burden would fall on two companies—UnitedHealthcare and its subsidiary, Oxford—and their hundreds of thousands of customers across the state.

Also unclear is why health insurers as a group should be singled out for further taxation when the federal tax cut benefits all corporations. Cuomo has linked his call for additional revenue to the threat of cuts to federal funding for Medicaid and other health programs. For the most part, however, those threats have not materialized—and the state’s overall federal health funding continues to climb.

So there’s good reason for Senate Republicans to reject Cuomo’s health insurance tax. But their alternative, as proposed, would add a superfluous layer of red tape while likely having little if any effect on premiums.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

‘Clusters’ Drive a Widespread Surge in New York’s Coronavirus Infection Rates

New York's coronavirus infection rates have surged to their highest levels since May, pushing 10 counties – including Brooklyn, Rockland and Orange – above a threshold that the Cuomo administration uses to justify travel restrictions on other states. Read More

Not a Moment Too Soon, Bill de Blasio Is Setting a Good Fiscal Example

After months of flailing, floundering and stalling on desperately needed cuts to New York City's pandemic-ravaged budget, Mayor de Blasio just made a smart and appropriate move to save money—in the process defying one of New York's most powerful government employee unions. Read More

Cahill Charges Are An Indictment Of Cuomo’s Policies

Yesterday’s indictment of the state’s top construction union official on federal corruption charges raises a big question: if private companies are paying bribes to avoid having to work with certain construction unions, why is Governor Cuomo insisting that the state keep doing it? Read More

New York State Has Dug Itself Into Its Deepest Hole On Record

"State's Financial Hole Deepens" is the headline on Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli's press release accompanying the August cash flow report. Read More

New Yorkers Paid Less in Federal Taxes in First Year of New Federal Tax Law

Federal income taxes paid by New Yorkers decreased by nearly $3.4 billion in 2018, the first year of the new federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), according to newly released Internal Revenue Service data. Read More

The DOJ’s Probe of Coronavirus in Nursing Homes Appears to Leave Out Most Victims

The U.S. Justice Department's newly announced inquiry into coronavirus in New York's nursing homes comes with a crucial caveat: It will look only at government-operated facilities, which represent a small fraction of the state's nursing-home industry. Read More

State’s Per-Recipient Medicaid Spending Rises to 3rd Highest in the U.S.

New York's per-recipient Medicaid spending has soared to the nation's third highest rate, a sign of fiscal trouble for one of the state's most important programs. Read More

New York Medicaid Spending Is Projected to Jump 6% in Fiscal Year 2021 (UPDATED)

Despite a round of cost-cutting this spring, New York's Medicaid spending is on track to jump by 6 percent this year thanks to a massive influx of federal aid. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.