cash-pile-notes-150x150-3487423Governor Andrew Cuomo’s questionable plan for allocating $5.4 billion in windfall cash* has survived, almost intact, in the agreed-upon New York State budget for the 2016 fiscal year, which starts April 1.

Consistent with Cuomo’s original vision, the allocation shortchanges basic transportation and municipal infrastructure needs. The Legislature’s few agreed-upon revisions to the governor’s original appropriations language were minor and have not reduced the potential for waste and political wheeling-dealing in the name of “economic development.”

The major items left basically intact from Cuomo’s original proposal include his appropriations of $1.5 billion for the “Upstate Revitalization Initiative” – a.k.a. the Upstate Hunger Games – and $1.275 billion for the state Thruway Authority, with added verbiage requiring the authority to report to the Legislature how the money is spent.

The amount set aside for distressed upstate health care facilities was reduced from the original $400 million to $355 million, and the savings redistributed to other healthcare purposes, including $15.5 million for Roswell Park Cancer Institute, $19.5 million for a Community Care Revolving Capital Fund, and $10 million for information technology, electronic records and billing systems associated with mental health services covered by the state’s Medicaid managed care program.**

Otherwise, the most noteworthy changes to the settlement allocation were in the appropriations language (but not amounts) in three areas: broadband Internet expansion, development projects on Long Island, and grants and loans to benefit farmers.

Broadly worded “broadband”

The original language backing up the governor’s $500 million appropriation for the “New NY Broadband Initiative” was just 26 words long, stipulating only that the money would be spent to “support the development of infrastructure to bring high-speed internet access to underserved regions throughout the state, and to support the development of other telecommunications infrastructure.”

The final bill language begins with the same passage—including that loaded phrase “other telecommunications infrastructure” (telecom lobbyists, call your offices!).  However, the final bill also says that “priority shall be given to projects that bring high-speed Internet access to unserved areas of the state, public libraries, and educational opportunity centers.”

The final bill also requires that, by June 30, 2016, the Empire State Development Corp. (ESDC) submit a report “detailing: (a) the total amount of public funds committed by this program annually; (b) total amount of private funds committed annually and, if applicable, the amount of such funds that has been invested by such parties; (c) the location of each area receiving investments under this program and the goals for each such area; (d) planned future investments by both public and private parties; and (e) such other information as the corporation deems necessary.”

Note, however: there is still no definition of “high speed Internet” (the governor pegs it at an ambitious 100 megabits per second, or maybe 25 mbps in some remote areas) or on the extent of required private investments required to leverage the funds (Cuomo suggested the ratio would be one private dollar per public dollar). Nor does it include any other criteria for project selection. Instead, ESDC will report, more than a year from now, on how it has already begun spending the money.

This is shaping up as a potential telecom slush fund – controlled, ultimately, by the governor.

Pork pie for Long Island

The original bill set aside $150 million for “transit-oriented development,” including parking garages, at the Nassau and Ronkonkoma hubs on Long Island.

The final bill is more broadly worded, appropriating the same amount for “transformative economic development projects,” further defined as those that, in the judgment of ESDC, “will catalyze private investment resulting in significant economic development reflected in the creation of temporary and permanent jobs, the growth of the commercial and residential tax base or an enhancement of the environment and quality of life for residents of Nassau or Suffolk County.”

In other words, just about anything that involves a lot of steel and concrete.

Developers of some major Long Island projects now on the drawing board (or maybe on a sideboard) no doubt are already getting their ESDC presentations ready.

Farm finagling

Cuomo’s original capital projects bill set aside $50 million for a new “Southern Tier and Hudson Valley Farm and Agricultural Enhancement Program,” including “payments to farm owners” in those regions. The final bill is subtly reworded to refer to the “Southern Tier Agricultural Industry Enhancement and Hudson Valley Farmland Protection Programs” (i.e., two different regional initiatives) and stipulates that funds can flow to non-profit groups and local governments as well as to farmers themselves.

Agriculture is pretty extensive in every region of New York State outside New York City – so why were only two regions singled out in this manner?

Likely answers:

  • in the Southern Tier, money will flow to landowners who won’t get to cash in on shale gas exploration royalties, thanks to Cuomo’s fracking ban;
  • in the Hudson Valley, in which (unlike the Southern Tier and most of upstate) there is genuine development pressure, the money will be used to preserve the bucolic view-sheds of affluent weekenders from New York City.

It’s win-win!

Meanwhile, as documented in the latest TRIP report:

More than one-third of New York’s major roads are in poor condition, while more than one-third of the state’s bridges are deficient or do not meet modern design standards

And even as New York City transit ridership hits new records, there’s a $15 billion gap in the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s five-year capital plan.

And water mains keep breaking in old cities, such as Syracuse, that can’t afford to fix them.

___

* Also as the governor originally proposed, the budget will allocate $850 million as the downpayment on a 10-year plan for reimbursing the federal government for New York’s past over-billing of the Medicaid program. Future payments under the plan reportedly will average $200 million a year.
** Not included in the budget is a recently announced $610 million payment to the state by Germany’s Commerzbank. That money will remain un-programmed, for now.  (As it happens, the Commerzbank cash would be sufficient to cover payments on the Medicaid debt for the three remaining years in the current gubernatorial term, among other things.)

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

New York’s Medicaid costs are soaring at double-digit rates

New York's already high Medicaid spending is growing at a double-digit rate for the second year in a row, recently released state figures show. After dipping during the first year o Read More

Budget’s Historic Spending Hike Shown in Financial Plan Update

Amidst spiking inflation, a market downturn and recession fears, state spending will soar to new heights under the April budget deal, as per (Plan) that the Governor’s budget office quietly i Read More

Minimum wage for home care aides is likely to mean bigger raises for downstate than upstate

The newly enacted wage hike for home care aides is likely to increase workers' pay more than three times as much in the New York City area as in other parts of the state, according to a review of labor data. Read More

The flawed arguments behind ‘Fair Pay for Home Care’

As they contemplate a major increase in Medicaid spending on home care for the elderly and disabled, state legislators are relying on information that's outdated, incomplete or inaccurate – and neglecting to think through the predictable consequences. Read More

The debate over Medicaid home-care funding needs a reality check

The push in Albany to boost wages for home health aides is seemingly disconnected from the larger realities of the state’s long-term care system. As they , officials in the home care industry are warning that the state faces an of in-home caregivers Read More

Answers needed on Governor Hochul’s health-care budget

The health-care agenda laid out by Governor Hochul in her budget proposal this week leaves a lot of questions unanswered. Here are a few of them. Read More

The Health Department takes a big step toward COVID transparency

The state Health Department released a flurry of 20 COVID-related data sets this week, taking its biggest step yet toward full transparency about the state's pandemic response. Read More

Remembering the scandal that brought down Health Commissioner Howard Zucker

The resignation of Dr. Howard Zucker as state health commissioner marks the end of a term marred by scandal over his role in managing the coronavirus pandemic. The much-debated compelling nursing homes to admit COVID-positive patients, though it origi Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!