The New York Times has scared up more details about city and state plans to transform market-rate condos and rentals into government-subsidized “affordable housing” or “moderate-income housing.”

The head of New York State’s Housing Finance Agency, Priscilla Almodovar, said one aspect of the plan will involve using the state’s credit to guarantee mortgages for condo buyers, in return for the developer cutting the price.

The state is also looking at providing $40,000 grants to families whose income is less than $108,000 to help them buy apartments that are slightly out of their price range.

These plans are a two-fer in vintage New York politics.

First, they’re a huge taxpayer gift to politically connected developers and banks, who would have had to cut prices down, anyway, without government money.

Second, the government is using taxpayer money to attract more people to the illusion that they’re dependent on government to do well.

Consider: more than three-quarters of New York families would qualify for an “affordable” apartment under the rough guidelines the paper reported. Only a relative few would attain such an apartment, though, under a process that is vulnerable to New York corruption and favoritism.

The price of the program, to the millions of people who are theoretically eligible but won’t “win,” is higher housing prices for everyone, plus a slower adjustment to market prices.

Furthermore, the program is ineffective even for some “winners”: giving people a $40,000 grant to buy a house is just going to keep the price of that house $40,000 higher than it would have been, meaning a waste of government money.

But this is hard to understand — whereas it’s easy, the city and state pols hope, for people to skim the paper and get the idea that Christine Quinn, Gov. Paterson, and Mayor Bloomberg (whose own larger affordable-housing program, launched in his first term, is based on similar ideas) are looking out for them.

The city and state taxpayers pay another price, as well. Using state credit to back up mortgages means that there is less debt financing available for other worthy infrastructure projects.

Thankfully, we can all blame Bush for this (really).

As one Brooklyn Assemblyman with his own plan to make subsidized rentals out of condo buildings, Hakeem Jeffries, says, many of the banks behind the condo developments received TARP money last fall, and, “it is the right thing for these banks to recirculate these tax dollars into the economy.”

It’s true that bankers now feel even more beholden to government than ever, but lots of for-profit institutions have always happy to take government money.

What TARP did is allow these banks to delay reality on lots of their investments, including half-finished condos, giving the pols time to devise their market-killing plans.

You may also like

New York Has Widened Its Lead in Per-Capita Spending on Medicaid

New York's per-capita Medicaid spending soared to more than double the nationwide rate in 2018, widening its gap with the other 49 states. Read More

Essential Plan surplus hits $3B

As Governor Cuomo pleads for financial help from Washington, one of his state's programs is sitting on $3 billion in unspent federal aid: the Essential Plan. Read More

A grim toll gets worse

The full toll of the coronavirus pandemic in New York is likely thousands higher than the official death tallies, according to newly released federal data. Read More

Upstate escapes the worst

With the coronavirus pandemic hitting some parts of New York much harder than others, Governor Cuomo has signaled that he will begin to relax shutdown restrictions in low-virus parts of the state. Here's a closer look at how infection and fatality rates vary from region to region. Read More

Why New York?

#NYCoronavirus: It's increasingly apparent that New York is suffering more severely from the coronavirus pandemic than any other part of the U.S. and most of the rest of the world – raising stark questions for city and state leaders. What is it about New York, and especially New York City, that made it especially vulnerable to infection and death? And how can that be changed before the next virus breaks loose? Read More

NY is shorted on virus relief

Although New York is taking the brunt of the coronavirus pandemic – with 43 percent of the nation's known cases and 40 percent of the deaths – the state is due to receive only 5 percent of the $150 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund just established by Congress. Read More

NY’s uninsured rate hits new low

Bucking the national trend, New York's uninsured rate dropped for the eighth consecutive year, new data from the Census Bureau show. The share of New Yorkers lacking health coverage in 2018 was 5.4 percent in 2018, down from 5.7 percent the year before. The number of people lacking health coverage dropped by about 72,000, to just over 1 million. Both the rate and the number are roughly half what they were in 2013, the year before the Affordable Care Act went into effect. Read More

SOTS health-care roundup

Health care was the dog that did not bark at Governor Cuomo's combined State of State and budget address on Tuesday. Instead of announcing a major plan to expand coverage, he called for appointing a commission to study "options for achieving universal access" and report back by December – a clear sign that he has no stomach for tackling the issue in this session. Read More


Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.


Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130


The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.