A bill allowing New York City agencies to construct projects using the “design-build” procurement method would come with a big string attached.
Under design-build, designers and builders team up and bid on projects in one step instead of two, giving builders a greater stake in the design process and reducing the likelihood of costly delays or disputes. Now awaiting Governor Andrew Cuomo’s signature, the “New York City Public Works Investment Act” (S6293/A7636) would let certain city agencies as well as the city School Construction Authority, Health and Hospitals Corporation and Housing Authority (NYCHA) award construction contracts worth more than $10 million using design-build.
But there’s a catch: the measure, sponsored by Sen. Leroy Comrie (D-Queens) and Assemblyman Edward Braunstein (D-Queens), allows design-build only on projects “undertaken pursuant to a project labor agreement [PLA] in accordance with section 222 of the labor law.”
In other words, build-design teams hoping to bid on city projects will first need to cut a PLA deal with New York City construction unions in which they will agree to hire from union hiring halls and abide by union work rules.
Unions claim PLAs save money by getting different construction unions to synchronize their hours and days off. However, a mandatory PLA also shrinks the pool of eligible bidders, leaving the public with fewer choices.
While section 220 of the state Labor Law already forces would-be bidders to pay union rates, non-union contractors can at least deploy skilled workers more efficiently—for instance, having someone perform both carpentry and electrical work. Boxing out these non-union contractors from bidding on public works has been shown to drive up construction costs.
The Cuomo administration has pushed mandatory PLAs in a bid to boost the building trade unions that backed the governor’s 2018 re-election bid as the trades’ share of construction industry work continues a decades-long slide—and as some of their pension funds teeter toward insolvency.
Design-build, on its own, has the potential to let New York get more bang for its infrastructure bucks. But this bill, as written, risks neutralizing some, if not most, of the savings proponents envision.
Cuomo has until January 1 to decide whether to veto the bill.
About the Author
You may also like
The House GOP’s Shrinking Budget Plan Could Still Cost New York Billions
The likely impact of federal health-care cutbacks has diminished in recent days as House Republican leaders backed away from some of their bigger-ticket proposals, reducing the estimated savings to $625 billion from previous figures of $715 billion and $8 Read More
Feds Move To Close Medicaid’s ‘MCO Tax’ Loophole, Spelling Trouble for New York
New York's budget has sprung its first major leak just five days after being finalized by Governor Hochul and the Legislature.
On Tuesday, federal officials announced a that would Read More
Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget
The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan:
Top lines
Read More
Unforeseen Consequences
We acknowledge that the impact of these measures will be determined by their scope, implementation timeline, pace, and advancements in technology, infrastructure, and market dynamics.
Read More
Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy
New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More
How Medicaid ‘Expansion’ Changes Could Affect New York
As House Republicans consider cutbacks to federal Medicaid funding, their focus has turned to the so-called expansion population.
Although the details of remain undetermined, the s Read More
How Albany Could Save Millions by Closing a Medicaid Loophole
A glitch in state insurance law is allowing doctors to collect Medicaid fees that are sometimes hundreds of times higher than the program normally pays, costing taxpayers millions of dollars a year.
Read More
After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality
This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck.
When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More