Rising debts and liabilities for pensions and retiree health care could soon translate into higher borrowing costs for at least nine New York local governments, including a half dozen of the largest counties and towns in the state. They’re facing possible bond rating downgrades as part of a nationwide review of local ratings by Moody’s Investors Service.

Moody’s announced yesterday that it was reviewing ratings for a total of 256 bond issuers nationwide based on a new methodology that puts a greater weight on pensions and debt and less on economic factors. The reviews, which could result in either no ratings change or “one or two notch movements” in either direction, will be completed within the next 90 to 180 days, the ratings agency said. Unfunded health insurance promises to retired public employees, estimated to total a quarter-trillion dollars in New York, will also be considered in the pension category when they “appear to be particularly large relative to budget and tax base and management has not demonstrated a willingness to address related costs,” according to the new Moody’s methodology.

Suffolk County, the Empire State’s largest outside New York City, is among the New York localities whose ratings might fall a notch or two when the review is completed, Moody’s indicated.  Other big localities under review and facing possible downgrades include the Long Island towns of Hempstead and Huntington, along with Onondaga, Orange and Saratoga counties.  All except Onondaga County already had been assigned “negative” ratings outlooks by Moody’s before the review was announced yesterday. Suffolk’s bond rating was already A2, not particularly high for a large and relatively affluent county.  A further downgrade of a notch or two would bring that county closer to Moody’s lowest investment grade band, Baa.

On the other hand, 21 relatively low-rated New York localities under review by Moody’s are listed in the “possible upgrades” category. The largest is the city of Yonkers (see list at bottom of this post).

Further explanation from yesterday’s Moody’s news release: 

The increase in the weight attached to debt and pensions recognizes the potential for large pension liabilities to constrict a local government’s financial flexibility, says Moody’s. Because pension liabilities and debt each represent enforceable claims on the resources of local governments, Moody’s has weighted the debt portion of its currentmethodology more heavily to capture the combined financial impact of both debt and pensions.

The reduction in weight attached to economic factors acknowledges that some local governments are either unwilling or unable to convert the  strength of their local economies into revenues, says Moody’s. Tax caps,  anti-tax sentiment, the natural lag between economic activity and its  conversion into government revenues, often place obstacles between  municipal governments and the income generated by their local economies,  as do a variety of other factors.

The table below shows all New York localities under review; the “NOO” notation in the second column means there was no ratings outlook before the review.


About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Counties’ Medicaid role dwindles

New enrollment numbers from the state-run health insurance exchange confirm a trend relevant to budget talks in Albany: The role of local governments in signing people up for Medicaid is smaller than ever. Read More

A lesson on apprenticeships

The raw politics behind giveaways to building trade unions were on display last week in Troy, a city outside Albany. Read More

Cuomo extends costly arbitration law

Three years ago, Governor Andrew Cuomo blew a rare opportunity to fundamentally reform one of the most costly provisions of the New York State law regulating public-sector collective bargaining. Now he's about to blow it again. Read More

Local govs score with better websites

In 2014, the Empire Center created guidelines for what information local governments and school districts should make available on their websites—and found that most of the state's 500 largest municipalities and districts were not meeting that standard. Read More

“Warning”: taxes might not rise

Don't look now, but given current inflation trends, next year's school property tax cap may be ... zero! That's the message of a statement released last week by the Educational Conference Board (ECB), a coalition of groups representing public school administrators, school boards and—last but hardly least—the New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) labor union. The ECB's "warning" was meant as an inside-the-Albany-bubble scare tactic, but for most New Yorkers, it's good news: further confirmation that the tax cap is working exactly as intended. Read More

Local websites improve bit by byte

Good news to cap off Sunshine Week: at least some local government and school officials are working to make their websites more useful and informative. Read More

Local tax cap may dip in ’15

The property tax cap for New York counties, towns and villages with fiscal years starting January 1, 2015 will start at 1.56 percent, slightly lower than last year's starting rate of 1.66 percent. The cap in each locality will vary based on the amount of applicable allowable exclusions for growth in local property values. Localities also will be able to exclude the amount by which the change in pension contributions exceeds two percentage points Read More

Bill repeals local control of cop discipline

A bill rushed to passage by both houses of the Legislature last week would gut local control of police discipline by deeming it a subject of collective bargaining throughout the state. The bill can be seen as a fresh test of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's commitment to "transform" a state dominated by public employee unions. Read More