webhome2-e1463578931750-150x150-8535634Thirteen out of 16 New York school districts whose budgets were rejected by voters on May 15 were approved in re-votes held yesterday.

Seven of the re-voting districts initially failed to receive the 60 percent supermajority threshold for approval of budgets exceeding the tax cap. In yesterday’s voting, all but one of the re-submitted budgets stayed within the tax cap and thus required only simple majorities to pass. The exception was Johnstown in Fulton County, where the tax cap for 2018-19 was lower than 2017-18 due to unique local circumstances. Seventy percent of Johnstown voters said yes to the override on the second try.

Budgets were rejected a second time in two tiny upstate school districts: Ripley in Chautauqua County (137 pupils) and West Valley in Cattaraugus County (220 pupils). Under a crucial provision of the 2011 tax cap law, the defeat of the second budget proposal means the tax levies in these districts must be frozen at the previous year’s levels. The third rejected school budget was in East Ramapo in Rockland County, where the usual budget issues are complicated by the fact that most students attend orthodox Jewish religious schools.

Tax cap opponents, led by the New York State United Teachers, have decried the cap as “destructive” and “undemocratic,” and have pushed (so far unsuccessfully) for loopholes that would weaken it. Yesterday’s results are just the latest reminder that the cap is working as intended, slowing the rate of school tax growth while preserving local control and letting districts override it when they can make the case to voters.

Despite this, Albany legislators still seem too eager to quench NYSUT’s thirst for higher taxes:

Lawmakers, pressed by the same unions thwarting mandate relief, have dabbled in recent years with weakening the tax cap by adding exemptions or by decoupling it from inflation. More extreme proposals have called for letting school districts approve budgets above the cap with simple majority votes—essentially eliminating it, and inviting a return to the days when school tax levies grew an average of 6 percent a year.

The most recent exemption to win approval from state lawmakers was S7730/A9825 by Sen. Terrence Murphy (R-Westchester County) and Assemblymember Sandra Galef (D-Westchester County), which passed in each house over the last two weeks. The bill would exclude school district contributions toward regional boards of cooperative educational services (BOCES) capital costs from the tax cap formula. This is the Legislature’s second attempt to create the BOCES exclusion after Governor Andrew Cuomo vetoed the measure late last year.

Proponents likely note that school district capital costs are excluded from the cap formula—but gloss over the fact that, unlike BOCES charges, those costs are approved separately by voters via referendum.

Lawmakers have proposed more radical changes to weaken the cap but none have passed the full Assembly or Senate during the current session. NYSUT’s priority support for the relatively limited BOCES exception probably reflects the union’s assumption that it would represent an important precedent for creating additional loopholes.

Because spending $22,366 per pupil just isn’t enough.

About the Author

Ken Girardin

Ken Girardin is the Empire Center’s Director of Strategic Initiatives.

Read more by Ken Girardin

You may also like

School budgets sail under cap

Yesterday’s school budget votes proved once again New York’s school districts aren’t having much difficulty staying under—or overriding—the property tax cap. Read More

One-house megabucks

With the clock ticking toward the April 1 start of the next state fiscal year, Assembly Democrats just laid out their budget preferences—and, as usual, they add up to a massive tax-and-spend fantasy. Read More

Tax cap fibs test limits

Government unions aren’t letting the facts get in the way of their opposition to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s push for a permanent property tax cap. Testifying in Albany this month on Cuomo’s FY20 Executive Budget, union leaders made a number of misrepresentations regarding the cap, which since 2011 has slowed the growth of property taxes outside New York City. Read More

Cuomo holding strong on tax cap

Governor Andrew Cuomo on Friday laid down an important marker in his push to make the property tax cap permanent, rejecting changes that would weaken it. Read More

Assembly GOP wants higher taxes

Assembly Republicans, who ought to know better, have issued a proposal that would weaken the state’s property tax cap. Read More

Tax cap keeps getting grief

Seven years after its enactment, Governor Andrew Cuomo’s cap on property tax levies continues to be a target of unfounded criticism by some politicians and candidates who either don’t understand the cap or deliberately misrepresent how it works. Read More

More bad ideas lurking

On the whole, New Yorkers can breathe a sigh of relief if the state Senate’s gridlock forces an early end to the 2018 regular session of the Legislature. Otherwise, the next two weeks will still leave plenty of time for lawmakers to get up to no good. Read More

Tax cap wreaks chaos—not

In the wake of Tuesday’s school budget votes, 16 school districts around New York must decide whether to call for a second referendum after seeing their original proposals rejected. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.