joker-150x150-9106987In the wake of Tuesday’s school budget votes, 16 school districts around New York must decide whether to call for a second referendum after seeing their original proposals rejected.

Seven of the defeated budgets failed to achieve the required 60 percent supermajority for overriding the cap on property tax levies—which is set at the lesser of 2 percent or the inflation rate, plus excluded amounts that differ by district.

Nine of the rejected budgets called for tax hikes below the cap but nonetheless failed to win approval from a simple majority.

This year will be the latest test of a key and often overlooked provision of the tax cap law, which stipulates that tax levies must be frozen at prior-year levels if a budget fails to win approval from at least a simple majority in two attempts at passage. Prior to this year, only eight budgets have failed to win on the second try; the school board in two other districts (Marlboro and West Valley) decided not to seek a second vote after budgets were rejected in 2013 and 2016, respectively.

The districts with losing budgets are scattered in almost every region of the state, and the circumstances behind those defeats varied. For example:

  • Both New Rochelle and nearby Mamaroneck proposed budgets exceeding the cap. In Mamaroneck, enrollment is expected to increase more than 4 percent next year, while New Rochelle’s will stay flat. Mamaroneck’s budget reduced per-pupil spending by 1.6 percent, while New Rochelle’s raised it 5 percent. The Mamaroneck board explained the district’s growing costs to taxpayers, and the budget won approval from 78 percent of voters—while 65 percent of voters in New Rochelle said no.
  • In North Bellmore, the board presented a budget that remained below the property tax cap. However, “transportation-related propositions on the ballot” meant the budget needed a supermajority to pass. The tax cap law is written this way to prevent districts from funding voter favorites such as popular athletic sports as separate questions in a bid to end-run the cap.
  • In Fort Edward, the re-assessment of a General Electric-owned site is expected to drop the total taxable property in the district close to 20 percent and drive up the school tax rate by 32 percent.
  • In Gowanda, a $31 million capital project met organized opposition, such as the mailer below, that likely turned out a surge of ‘no” votes for the budget itself.

gowanda-300x201-7278136

The overall high rate of passage (almost 98 percent), is a reminder that the tax cap is sufficiently flexible to live under, and that it gives local control to override it when warranted. Since the 2012 school budget votes, the cap has acted as an effective speed limit for property tax growth. The cap has slowed the overall rate of increase for school taxes by about two-thirds, even as many districts have exercised their option to override it.

As the Empire Center noted earlier this month, nearly half of school districts (309) proposed budgets hiking taxes to the maximum allowable tax levy, suggesting that the cap has deterred them from spending even more.

School boards have benefited from a recent dip in the contributions they must make to the state Teachers Retirement System. Between 2014-15 and 2016-17, employer contribution rates to the TRS dropped by a full 5.8 percentage points of base salaries—effectively financing the bulk of typical salary hikes granted to teachers during that period. Districts statewide (excluding New York City, which has its own TRS) saw their pension costs drop nearly $800 million. The contribution rate dropped by another 1.9 percent of base salaries for 2017-18, likely saving school districts another $100 million on TRS bills payable this coming fall.

Of course, the tax cap was supposed to be paired with substantive mandate relief to give school boards more flexibility to improve education services and control costs, but state lawmakers have succumbed to union pressure and failed to enact meaningful reforms, especially with respect to pensions and collective bargaining.

Lawmakers, pressed by the same unions thwarting mandate relief, have dabbled in recent years with weakening the tax cap by adding exemptions or by decoupling it from inflation. More extreme proposals have called for letting school districts approve budgets above the cap with simple majority votes—essentially eliminating it, and inviting a return to the days when school tax levies grew an average of 6 percent a year.

About the Author

Ken Girardin

Ken Girardin is the Empire Center’s Director of Strategic Initiatives.

Read more by Ken Girardin

You may also like

State Forces School Districts To Give Raises—And Layoffs

Months of bad decisions and inaction by New York state officials have put school districts in the awkward position of having to give pay raises to most teachers while laying off others. Read More

Even After Aid Cut, New York Will Spend Most on Education

If New York was a country in 2016—the most recent year for global education spending data—it would have boasted the highest per pupil expenditure in the world, even after subtracting 20 percent of state aid. Read More

“LIFO” strikes again

Rochester schools are laying off 152 teachers, but there’s little doubt which educators are on the chopping block. Read More

School budgets sail under cap

Yesterday’s school budget votes proved once again New York’s school districts aren’t having much difficulty staying under—or overriding—the property tax cap. Read More

Where NY’s school money goes

It’s commonly perceived that New York’s education funding system directs more money to wealthier, whiter schools than to poorer, less white schools – and that the distribution of state aid reinforces those inequities. Looking at the totality of school spending across the state, however, different patterns emerge. Read More

One-house megabucks

With the clock ticking toward the April 1 start of the next state fiscal year, Assembly Democrats just laid out their budget preferences—and, as usual, they add up to a massive tax-and-spend fantasy. Read More

Tax cap fibs test limits

Government unions aren’t letting the facts get in the way of their opposition to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s push for a permanent property tax cap. Testifying in Albany this month on Cuomo’s FY20 Executive Budget, union leaders made a number of misrepresentations regarding the cap, which since 2011 has slowed the growth of property taxes outside New York City. Read More

Cuomo holding strong on tax cap

Governor Andrew Cuomo on Friday laid down an important marker in his push to make the property tax cap permanent, rejecting changes that would weaken it. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.